Who (really) is Charlie?" French cities with lower implicit prejudice toward arabs demonstrated larger participation rates in Charlie Hebdo Rallies

International Review of Social Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 69-76

  Zerhouni, Oulmann ^a   Rougier, Marine ^a   Muller, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Culture; Group behavior; Implicit association test; Implicit prejudice; Implicit social cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008312165     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23978570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/irsp.50     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arkes, H. R., & Tetlock, P. E. (2004). Attributions of implicit prejudice, or "would Jesse Jackson 'fail' the Implicit Association Test?." Psychological Inquiry, 15(4), 257-278. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1504-01.
2. Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 380-393. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.380.
3. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot. New York: Delacorte Press.
4. Bardin, B., Perrissol, S., Py, J., Fos, Y., & Souchon, N. (2016). Testing of a paper-And-pencil Personalized Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT-P). International Review of Social Psychology. 29(1), 31-44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/irsp.35.
5. Cohu, M., Maisonneuve, C., & Testé, B. (2016). The "Charlie-Hebdo" effect: Repercussions of the January 2015 terrorist attacks in France on prejudice towards immigrants and North-Africans, social dominance orientation, and attachment to the principle of laïcité. International Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 50-58. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/irsp.59.
6. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 297-327. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.
7. Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (Eds), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 283-310.
8. Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press.
9. Green, A. R., Carney, D. R., Pallin, D. J., Ngo, L. H., Raymond, K. L., Iezzoni, L. I., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(9), 1231-1238. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5.
10. Greenwald, A. G. (1990). What cognitive representations underlie social attitudes? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(3), 254-260. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334018.
11. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4.
12. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
13. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.
14. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17-41. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015575.
15. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Le Gschwender, T., & Schmitt, M. H. (2005). A meta-Analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369-1385. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167205275613.
16. Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 774-788. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774.
17. Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 16-32. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16.
18. Marini, M., Sriram, N., Schnabel, K., Maliszewski, N., Devos, T., Ekehammar, B., et al. (2013). Overweight people have low levels of implicit weight bias, but overweight nations have high levels of implicit weight bias. PloS One, 8(12), e83543. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083543.s001.
19. Mayer, N., & Tiberj, V. (2016). Who were the Charlie in the streets? A socio-political approach of the January 11 rallies. International Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 59-69. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/irsp.63.
20. McConnell, A. R., & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 435-442. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1470.
21. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., et al. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psy-chology, 18(1), 36-88. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053.
22. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., & Sriram, N. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593-10597. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106.
23. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.
24. Tiberj, V., & Mayer, N. (2015, May 19). Le simplisme d'Emmanuel Todd démonté par la sociologie des Je suis Charlie [The oversimplification of Emmanuel Todd contradicted by the sociology of the "Je suis Charlie"]. Le Monde, Retrieved from http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2015/05/19/le-simplisme-d-emmanuel-Todd-demonte-par-la-sociologie-des-je-suis-charlie-4635826-3232.html.
25. Todd, E. (2015). Qui est Charlie? Sociologie d'une crise religieuse [Who is Charlie? Sociology of a religious crisis]. Paris: Seuil.
26. Wittenbrink, B., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (2007). Implicit measures of attitudes. New York: Guilford Press.
27. Ziegert, J. C., & Hanges, P. J. (2005). Employment discrimination: The role of implicit attitudes, motivation, and a climate for racial bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 553-562. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.553.