Closed-loop supply chain management: From conceptual to an action oriented framework on core acquisition

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 167, Issue , 2017, Pages 1415-1424

  Gaur, Jighyasu ^a   Subramoniam, Ramesh ^b   Govindan, Kannan ^c   Huisingh, Donald ^d  

^a IFHE UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b and Regulatory Enforcement services   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process; Consumers' disposition behavior; Core acquisition management; Remanufacturing; Reverse logistics; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SURVEYS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONSUMERS' DISPOSITION BEHAVIOR; REMANUFACTURING; REVERSE LOGISTICS;

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR;

EID: 85008165480     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.098     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Atasu, A., Guide, V.D.R. Jr., Van Wassenhove, L.N., So what if remanufacturing cannibalizes my new product sales. Calif. Manage. Rev. 52:2 (2010), 56–76.
2. Caterpillar Sustainability Report, 2011. Caterpillar Inc.
3. Coulter, R.A., Ligas, M., To retain or to relinquish: exploring the disposition practices of packrats and purgers. Adv. Consu. Res. 30 (2003), 38–43.
4. Cox, J., Griffith, S., Giorgi, S., King, G., Consumer understanding of product lifetimes. Resour. Consern. Recycl. 79 (2013), 21–29.
5. Dekker, R., Fleischmann, M., Inderfurth, K., Van Wassenhove, L.N., Reverse Logistics: Quantitative Models for Closed-loop Supply Chains. 2013, Springer Science & Business Media.
6. Diabat, A., Kannan, G., An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resour. Consern. Recycl. 55:6 (2011), 659–667.
7. Gaur, J., Amini, M., Rao, A.K., Closed-loop supply chain configuration for new and reconditioned products: an integrated optimization model. Omega 66:B (2017), 212–223.
8. Gaur, J., Amini, M., Banerjee, P., Gupta, R., Drivers of consumer purchase intentions for remanufactured products: a study of Indian consumers relocated to the USA. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 18:1 (2015), 30–47.
9. Guide, V.D.R., Srivastava, R., Repairable inventory theory: models and applications. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 102:1 (1997), 1–20.
10. Guide, V.D.R., Van Wassenhove, L.N., Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10 (2001), 142–155.
11. Guide, V.D.R., Muyldermans, L., Van Wassenhove, L.N., Hewlett-Packard company unlocks the value potential from time-sensitive returns. Interfaces 35:4 (2005), 281–293.
12. Gupta, R., Hershey, D.A., Gaur, J., Time perspective and procrastination in the workplace: an empirical investigation. Curr. Psy. 31:2 (2012), 195–211.
13. Haq, A.N., Kannan, G., Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model. Int. J. Adv. Manu. Tech. 29:7–8 (2006), 826–835.
14. Hofstede, G., The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9:3 (1984), 389–398.
15. Jacoby, J., Berning, C.K., Dietvorst, T.F., What about disposition?. J. Mark., 1977, 22–28.
16. Jena, S.K., Sarmah, S.P., Measurement of consumers' return intention index towards returning the used products. J. Clean. Prod. 108 (2015), 818–829.
17. Kannan, G., Soleimani, H., Kannan, D., Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: a comprehensive review to explore the future. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 240:3 (2015), 603–626.
18. Korhonen, P., Voutilainen, R., Finding the most preferred alliance structure between banks and insurance companies. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 175:2 (2006), 1285–1299.
19. Lastovicka, J.L., Fernandez, K.V., Three paths to disposition: the movement of meaningful possessions to strangers. J. Consu. Res. 31 (2005), 813–823.
20. Pagell, M., Wu, Z., Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. J. Sup. chain Manag. 45:2 (2009), 37–56.
21. Pearce, J.A. II, The profit-making allure of product reconstruction. MIT Slo. Manag. Rev. 50:3 (2009), 58–65.
22. Pokharel, S., Liang, Y., A model to evaluate acquisition price and quantity of used products for remanufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 138:1 (2012), 170–176.
23. Realff, M.J., Ammons, J.C., Newton, D.J., Robust reverse production system design for carpet recycling. IIE Trans. 36:8 (2004), 767–776.
24. Sahyouni, K., Savaskan, R.C., Daskin, M.S., A facility location model for bidirectional flows. Transpo. Sci. 41 (2007), 484–499.
25. Seitz, M.A., A critical assessment of motives for product recovery: the case of engine remanufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 15:11 (2007), 1147–1157.
26. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D.S., Edwards, C.S., The consideration of future consequences: weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psy., 66(4), 1994, 742.
27. Subramoniam, R., Huisingh, D., Chinnam, R.B., Remanufacturing for the automotive aftermarket-strategic factors: literature review and future research needs. J. Clean. Prod. 17:13 (2009), 1163–1174.
28. Subramoniam, R., Huisingh, D., Chinnam, R.B., Aftermarket remanufacturing strategic planning decision-making framework: theory & practice. J. Clean. Prod. 18:16 (2010), 1575–1586.
29. Subramoniam, R., Huisingh, D., Chinnam, R.B., Subramoniam, S., Remanufacturing Decision-Making Framework (RDMF): research validation using the analytical hierarchical process. J. Clean. Prod. 40 (2013), 212–220.
30. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation. 1980, McGraw, New York.
31. Saaty, T.L., Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Ser. Sci. 1:1 (2008), 83–98.
32. Wedley, W.C., Consistency prediction for incomplete AHP matrices. Math. Comp. Mod. 17:4 (1993), 151–161.
33. Wei, S., Tang, O., Sundin, E., Core (product) Acquisition Management for remanufacturing: a review. J. Reman. 5:1 (2015), 1–27.
34. Yang, C.H., Wang, J., Ji, P., Optimal acquisition policy in remanufacturing under general core quality distributions. Int. J. Produ. Res. 53:5 (2015), 1425–1438.
35. Guide, V.D.R., Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. J. Oper. Manag. 18 (2000), 467–483.
36. Klausner, M., Hendrickson, C.T., Reverse-logistics strategy for product take-back. Interfaces 30:3 (2000), 156–165.
37. Morana, R., Seuring, S., End-of-life returns of long-lived products from end consumer-insights from an ideally set up closed-loop supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45 (2007), 4423–4437.
38. Savaskan, C., Bhattacharya, S., Van Wassenhove, L.N., Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Manag. Sci. 50 (2004), 239–252.
39. Östlin, J., Sundin, E., Björkman, M., Importance of closed-loop supply chain relationships for product remanufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 115:2 (2008), 336–348.
40. Srivastava, S.K., Network design for reverse logistics. Omega 36 (2008), 535–548.
41. Özkır, V., Başlıgıl, H., Modelling product-recovery processes in closed-loop supply-chain network design. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50:8 (2012), 2218–2233.
42. Kannan, G., Kaliyan, M., Kannan, D., Haq, A.N., Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147 (2014), 555–568.
43. Pei, Z., Paswan, A., Yan, R., E-tailer's return policy, consumer's perception of return policy fairness and purchase intention. J. Retail. Consu. Ser. 21:3 (2014), 249–257.
44. Shaharudin, M.R., Govindan, K., Zailani, S., Tan, K.C., Managing product returns to achieve supply chain sustainability: an exploratory study and research propositions. J. Clean. Prod. 101 (2015), 1–15.
45. Shaharudin, M.R., Zailani, S., Tan, K.C., Barriers to product returns and recovery management in a developing country: investigation using multiple methods. J. Clean. Prod. 96 (2015), 220–232.
46. Burke, M., Conn, W.D., Lutz, R.J., Using psychographic variables to investigate product disposition behaviors. Proceedings of the AMA Educator's Conference, vol. 43, 1978, 321–326.
47. DeBell, M., Dardis, R., Extending product life: technology isn't the only issue. Adv. Consu. Res., 6(1), 1979.
48. Hanson, J.W., A proposed paradigm for consumer product disposition processes. J. Consu. Aff. 14:1 (1980), 49–67.
49. Harrell, G.D., McConocha, D.M., Personal factors related to consumer product disposal. J. Consu. Aff. 26:2 (1992), 397–417.
50. Cooper, T., Inadequate Life? Evidence of consumer attitudes to product obsolescence. J. Consu. Pol. 27 (2004), 421–449.
51. Paden, N., Stell, R., Consumer Product redistribution: disposition decisions and channel options. J. Mark. Chann. 12:3 (2005), 105–123.
52. Thomas, C., Sharp, V., Understanding the normalisation of recycling behaviour and its implications for other pro-environmental behaviours: a review of social norms and recycling. Resour. Consern. Recycl. 79 (2013), 11–20.
53. Türe, M., Value-in-disposition Exploring how consumers derive value from disposition of possessions. Mark. Theory 14:1 (2014), 53–72.
54. Lee, M., Ko, E., Lee, S., Kim, K., Understanding luxury disposition. Psychol. Mark. 32:4 (2015), 467–480.
55. Echegaray, F., Consumers' reactions to product obsolescence in emerging markets: the case of Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 134:Part A (2015), 191–203.