A simplified approach to stakeholder engagement in natural resource management: The Five-Feature Framework

Ecology and Society

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Talley, Jared L ^a,b   Schneider, Jen ^b   Lindquist, Eric ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Five feature framework; Natural resource management; Stakeholder engagement

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 85008153198     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-08830-210438     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allen, E., C. Kruger, F.-Y. Leung, and J. C. Stephens. 2013. Diverse perceptions of stakeholder engagement within an environmental modeling research team. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 3(3):343–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0136-x
2. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4):216–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
3. Aubron, C., G. Guérin, B. Gallion, and C.-H. Moulin. 2013. Drawing together the knowledge of forestry and pastoralism experts in the construction of a technical support tool for silvopastoralism. Journal of Environmental Management 117:162–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.041
4. Biagioli, M. 2009. Postdisciplinary liaisons: science studies and the humanities. Critical Inquiry 35(4):816–833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/599586
5. Bond, A., A. Morrison-Saunders, J. A. E. Gunn, J. Pope, and F. Retief. 2015. Managing uncertainty, ambiguity and ignorance in impact assessment by embedding evolutionary resilience, participatory modelling and adaptive management. Journal of Environmental Management 151:97–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.030
6. Brody, S. D., D. R. Godschalk, and R. J. Burby. 2003. Mandating citizen participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(3):245–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944360308978018
7. Butler, C., and J. Adamowski. 2015. Empowering marginalized communities in water resources management: addressing inequitable practices in participatory model building. Journal of Environmental Management 153:153–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.010
8. Caves, J. K., G. S. Bodner, K. Simms, L. A. Fisher, and T. Robertson. 2013. Integrating collaboration, adaptive management, and scenario-planning: experiences at Las Cienegas National Conservation Area. Ecology and Society 18(3):43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-05749-180343
9. Chess, C., and K. Purcell. 1999. Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? Environmental Science & Technology 33(16):2685–2692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es980500g
10. Decker, D. J., A. B. Forstchen, E. F. Pomeranz, C. A. Smith, S. J. Riley, C. A. Jacobson, J. F. Organ, and G. R. Batcheller. 2015. Stakeholder engagement in wildlife management: Does the public trust doctrine imply limits? Journal of Wildlife Management 79(2):174–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.809
11. Depoe, S. P., J. W. Delicath, and M.-F. A. Elsenbeer. 2004. Communication and public participation in environmental decision making. SUNY Press, Albany, New York, USA.
12. Endres, D. 2009. Science and public participation: an analysis of public scientific argument in the Yucca Mountain controversy. Environmental Communication 3(1):49–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524030802704369
13. Freeman, R. E. 1983. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
14. Freeman, R. E. 1999. Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24(2):233–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893932
15. Gopnik, M., C. Fieseler, L. Cantral, K. McClellan, L. Pendleton, and L. Crowder. 2012. Coming to the table: early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 36(5):1139–1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.012
16. Grimble, R., and K. Wellard. 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 55(2):173–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0308-521x(97)00006-1
17. Hamilton, J. D. 2003. Exploring technical and cultural appeals in strategic risk communication: the Fernald radium case. Risk Analysis 23(2):291–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00309
18. Hood, N. E., T. Brewer, R. Jackson, and M. E. Wewers. 2010. Survey of community engagement in NIH-funded research. Clinical and Translational Science 3(1):19–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00179.x
19. Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2004. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice 5(4):419–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170
20. Johnson, T. L., J. M. Bielicki, R. S. Dodder, M. R. Hilliard, P. O. Kaplan, and C. A. Miller. 2012. Advancing sustainable bioenergy: evolving stakeholder interests and the relevance of research. Environmental Management 51(2):339–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9884-8
21. Jones, T. M., and A. C. Wicks. 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24(2):206–221.
22. Keen, M., and S. Mahanty. 2006. Learning in sustainable natural resource management: challenges and opportunities in the Pacific. Society and Natural Resources 19(6):497–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920600663896
23. Kellert, S. R., J. N. Mehta, S. A. Ebbin, and L. L. Lichtenfeld. 2000. Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources 13(8):705–715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419200750035575
24. Kemp, R., S. Parto, and R. B. Gibson. 2005. Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8(1/2):12–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijsd.2005.007372
25. Kidd, S., and L. McGowan. 2013. Constructing a ladder of transnational partnership working in support of marine spatial planning: thoughts from the Irish Sea. Journal of Environmental Management 126:63–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.025
26. Knapp, C. N., F. S. Chapin III, G. P. Kofinas, N. Fresco, C. Carothers, and A. Craver. 2014. Parks, people, and change: the importance of multistakeholder engagement in adaptation planning for conserved areas. Ecology and Society 19(4):16. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-06906-190416
27. Koontz, T. M., and C. W. Thomas. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66:111–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x
28. Korsgaard, M. A., D. M. Schweiger, and H. J. Sapienza. 1995. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: the role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal 38(1):60–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256728
29. Krasny, M. E., and J. Delia. 2014. Campus sustainability and natural area stewardship: student involvement in adaptive comanagement. Ecology and Society 19(3):27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-06787-190327
30. Lachapelle, P. R., S. F. McCool, and M. E. Patterson. 2003. Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a “messy” world. Society and Natural Resources 16(6):473–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920309151
31. Larson, S., T. G. Measham, and L. J. Williams. 2010. Remotely engaged? Towards a framework for monitoring the success of stakeholder engagement in remote regions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53(7):827–845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.490050
32. Maak, T. 2007. Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics 74(4):329–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9510-5
33. McLain, R. J., and R. G. Lee. 1996. Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management 20(4):437–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01474647
34. Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4):853–886.
35. Noland, J., and R. Phillips. 2010. Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews 12(1):39–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00279.x
36. O’Faircheallaigh, C. 2010. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30(1):19–27.
37. O’Rourke, M., and S. J. Crowley. 2013. Philosophical intervention and cross-disciplinary science: the story of the Toolbox Project. Synthese 190(11):1937–1954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0175-y
38. Parkins, J. R., and R. E. Mitchell. 2005. Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 18(6):529–540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920590947977
39. Partidário, M. R., W. R. Sheate, O. Bina, H. Byron, and B. Augusto. 2008. Sustainability assessment for agriculture scenarios in Europe’s mountain areas: lessons from six study areas. Environmental Management 43(1):144–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9206-3
40. Powell, M. C., and M. Colin. 2008. Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology: What would it really take? Science Communication 30(1):126–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547008320520
41. Prell, C., K. Hubacek, and M. Reed. 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 22(6):501–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920802199202
42. PytlikZillig, L. M., and A. J. Tomkins. 2011. Public engagement for informing science and technology policy: What do we know, what do we need to know, and how will we get there? Review of Policy Research 28(2):197–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00489.x
43. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10):2417–2431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
44. Reed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90(5):1933–1949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
45. Ritti, R. 1968. Work goals of scientists and engineers. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 7(2):118–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232x.1968.tb01068.x
46. Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 25(1):3–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
47. Saloranta, T. M. 2001. Post-normal science and the global climate change issue. Climatic Change 50(4):395–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010636822581
48. Sands, R. G., J. Stafford, and M. McClelland. 1990. “I Beg to Differ”: conflict in the interdisciplinary team. Social Work in Health Care 14(3):55–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J010v14n03_04
49. Smith, P. D., and M. H. McDonough. 2001. Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources 14(3):239–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419201750111056
50. Soste, L., Q. J. Wang, D. Robertson, R. Chaffe, S. Handley, and Y. Wei. 2015. Engendering stakeholder ownership in scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 91(1):250–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.002
51. Stringer, L. C., A. J. Dougill, E. Fraser, K. Hubacek, C. Prell, and M. S. Reed. 2006. Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society 11(2):39.
52. Tompkins, E. L., and W. N. Adger. 2004. Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecology and Society 9(2):10.
53. Vigar, G., and P. Healey. 2002. Developing environmentally respectful policy programmes: five key principles. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45(4):517–532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640560220143530
54. Wagenet, L. P., and M. J. Pfeffer. 2007. Organizing citizen engagement for democratic environmental planning. Society and Natural Resources 20(9):801–813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920701216578
55. Webler, T., H. Kastenholz, and O. Renn. 1995. Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15(5):443–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-e