Peripheral venous catheter-related adverse events: Evaluation from a multicentre epidemiological study in France (the CATHEVAL project)

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Miliani, Katiuska ^a   Taravella, Raphaël ^a   Thillard, Denis ^a   Chauvin, Valérie ^b   Martin, Emmanuelle ^c   Edouard, Stéphanie ^d   Astagneau, Pascal ^a,e,f  

^a ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

^b F Widal University Hospital   (France)

^c Elbeuf Louviers Val de Reuil Intercommunal Hospital   (France)

^d Geriatrics Department   (France)

^e SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^f EHESP SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATHETER INFECTION; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEMATOLOGIC DISEASE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERIPHERAL VENOUS CATHETER; PHLEBITIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BANDAGE; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICE REMOVAL; DEVICES; INCIDENCE; INDWELLING CATHETER; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BANDAGES; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHLEBITIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85008153125     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168637     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gabriel J. Vascular access devices: securement and dressings. Nurs Stand 2010; 24:41-6.
2. Société Française d'Hygiène Hospitalière (SFHH), Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). Prévention des infections liées aux cathéters veineux périphériques. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. [Prevention of peripheral venous catheter-related infections. Guidelines for clinical practice]. Saint-Denis: HAS, FR; 2005. 51 p. [in French]. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/Catheters-veineux-2005-rap.pdf
3. Réseau d'alerte d'investigation et de surveillance des infections nosocomiales (Raisin). Enquête nationale de prévalence des infections nosocomiales et des traitements anti-infectieux en établissements de santé, France, mai-juin 2012. Résultats. [Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in French hospitals, May-June 2012. Results]. Saint-Maurice: Institut de veille Sanitaire, FR; 2013. 181 p. [in French]. http://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr//Publications-et-outils/Rapports-et-syntheses/Maladies-infectieuses/2013/Enquete-nationale-de-prevalence-des-infections-nosocomiales-et-des-traitements-anti-infectieux-en-etablissements-de-sante-France-mai-juin-2012
4. Rickard CM, McCann D, Munnings J, McGrail MR. Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med 2010; 8:53. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-53 PMID: 20831782
5. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, New K. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. In: Webster J, editor. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., vol. 4, Chichester, UK, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013, p. CD007798.
6. Abolfotouh MA, Salam M, Bani-Mustafa A, White D, Balkhy HH. Prospective study of incidence and predictors of peripheral intravenous catheter-induced complications. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2014; 10:993-1001. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S74685 PMID: 25525365
7. Marsh N, Webster J, Mihala G, Rickard CM. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters to prevent complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 6:CD011070.
8. Soifer NE, Borzak S, Edlin BR, Weinstein R a, Reese M. Prevention of Peripheral Venous Catheter Complications With an Intravenous Therapy Team. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:473. PMID: 9508225
9. Webster J, Clarke S, Paterson D, Hutton A, van Dyk S, Gale C, et al. Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008; 337: a339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a339 PMID: 18614482
10. Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, Marsh N, McGrail MR, French V, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 2012; 380:1066-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61082-4 PMID: 22998716
11. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The Risk of Bloodstream Infection in Adults With Different Intravascular Devices: A Systematic Review of 200 Published Prospective Studies. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81:1159-71. doi: 10.4065/81.9.1159 PMID: 16970212
12. Lee W-L, Liao S-F, Lee W-C, Huang C-H, Fang C-T. Soft tissue infections related to peripheral intravenous catheters in hospitalised patients: a case-control study. J Hosp Infect 2010; 76:124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.05.012 PMID: 20619497
13. Lee W-LL, Chen H-LL, Tsai T-YY, Lai I-CC, Chang W-CC, Huang C-HH, et al. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter infection in hospitalized patients: A prospective study of 3165 patients. Am J Infect Control 2009; 37:683-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.02.009 PMID: 19559502
14. Zingg W, Pittet D. Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 34:S38-42. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(09)70565-5 PMID: 19931816
15. Carlet J, Astagneau P, Brun-Buisson C, Coignard B, Salomon V, Tran B, et al. French national program for prevention of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance, 1992-2008: positive trends, but perseverance needed. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009; 30:737-45. doi: 10.1086/598682 PMID: 19566444
16. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40:373-83. PMID: 3558716
17. Maddox RR, Rush DR, Rapp RP, Foster TS, Mazella V, McKean HE. Double-blind study to investigate methods to prevent cephalothin-induced phlebitis. Am J Hosp Pharm 1977; 34:29-34. PMID: 831472
18. Wei LJ, Lin DY, Weissfeld L. Regression Analysis of Multivariate Incomplete Failure Time Data by Modeling Marginal Distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1989; 84:1065-73.
19. Tagalakis V, Kahn SR, Libman M, Blostein M. The epidemiology of peripheral vein infusion thrombophlebitis: a critical review. Am J Med 2002; 113:146-51. PMID: 12133753
20. Ray-Barruel G, Polit DF, Murfield JE, Rickard CM. Infusion phlebitis assessment measures: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2014; 20:191-202. doi: 10.1111/jep.12107 PMID: 24401116
21. Wallis MC, McGrail M, Webster J, Marsh N, Gowardman J, Playford EG, et al. Risk Factors for Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure: A Multivariate Analysis of Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014; 35:63-8. doi: 10.1086/674398 PMID: 24334800
22. Hershey CO, Tomford JW, McLaren CE, Porter DK, Cohen DI. The natural history of intravenous catheter-associated phlebitis. Arch Intern Med 1984; 144:1373-5. PMID: 6732398
23. Uslusoy E, Mete S. Predisposing factors to phlebitis in patients with peripheral intravenous catheters: A descriptive study. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008; 20:172-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00305.x PMID: 18387013
24. Webster J, McGrail M, Marsh N, Wallis MC, Ray-Barruel G, Rickard CM. Postinfusion Phlebitis: Incidence and Risk Factors. Nurs Res Pract 2015; 2015:1-3.
25. González López JLL, Arribi Vilela a., Fernández del Palacio E, Olivares Corral J, Benedicto Martí C, Herrera Portal P. Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomized study. J Hosp Infect 2014; 86:117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.10.008 PMID: 24373830
26. Kagel EM, Rayan GM. Intravenous catheter complications in the hand and forearm. J Trauma 2004; 56:123-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000058126.72962.74 PMID: 14749578
27. Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. The impact of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:174-7. doi: 10.3201/eid0702.700174 PMID: 11294700
28. Cicolini G, Manzoli L, Simonetti V, Flacco ME, Comparcini D, Capasso L, et al. Phlebitis risk varies by peripheral venous catheter site and increases after 96 hours: a large multi-centre prospective study. J Adv Nurs 2014; 70:2539-49. doi: 10.1111/jan.12403 PMID: 24684163
29. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns L a, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control 2011; 39:S1-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.003 PMID: 21511081