High relative deoxyribonucleic acid content of trophectoderm biopsy adversely affects pregnancy outcomes

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 731-736.e1

  Neal, Shelby A ^a,b   Franasiak, Jason M ^a,b   Forman, Eric J ^a,b   Werner, Marie D ^a,b   Morin, Scott J ^a,b   Tao, Xin ^a   Treff, Nathan R ^a,b   Scott, Richard T ^a,b  

^a REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comprehensive chromosome screening; IVF; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; trophectoderm biopsy

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; DNA;

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPREHENSIVE CHROMOSOME SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA CONTENT; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; ENDOMETRIAL THICKNESS; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX CHROMOSOME; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; TROPHECTODERM BIOPSY; BIOPSY; BLASTOCYST; CHEMISTRY; FERTILITY; GENETIC MARKER; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INFERTILITY; MIDDLE AGED; NIDATION; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPREGULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BLASTOCYST; DNA; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; LIVE BIRTH; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UP-REGULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85008151952     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 1 Scott, R.T., Upham, K.M., Forman, E.J., Hong, K.H., Scott, K.L., Taylor, D., et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 100 (2013), 697–703.
2. 2 Forman, E.J., Hong, K.H., Ferry, K.M., Tao, X., Taylor, D., Levy, B., et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 100 (2013), 100–107.
3. 3 Yang, Z., Liu, J., Collins, G.S., Salem, S.A., Liu, X., Lyle, S.S., et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet, 5, 2012, 24.
4. 4 Dahdouh, E.M., Balayal, J., García-Velasco, J.A., Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Reprod Biomed 30 (2015), 281–289.
5. 5 Dahdouh, E.M., Balayla, J., García-Velasco, J.A., Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 104 (2015), 1503–1512.
6. 6 Hardy, K., Martin, K.L., Leese, H.J., Winston, R.M., Handyside, A.H., Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Hum Reprod 5 (1990), 708–714.
7. 7 Duncan, F.E., Stein, P., Williams, C.J., Schultz, R.M., The effect of blastomere biopsy on preimplantation mouse embryo development and global gene expression. Fertil Steril 91 (2009), 1462–1465.
8. 8 Kokkali, G., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Vrettou, C., Stavrou, D., Jones, G.M., Cram, D.S., et al. Blastocyst biopsy versus cleavage stage biopsy and blastocyst transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of beta-thalassaemia: a pilot study. Hum Reprod 22 (2007), 1443–1449.
9. 9 Scott, R.T., Upham, K.M., Forman, E.J., Zhao, T., Treff, N.R., Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril 100 (2013), 624–630.
10. 10 Cieslak-Janzen, J., Tur-Kaspa, I., Ilkevitch, Y., Bernal, A., Morris, R., Verlinsky, Y., Multiple micromanipulations for preimplantation genetic diagnosis do not affect embryo development to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril 85 (2006), 1826–1829.
11. 11 Montag, M., van der Ven, K., Rosing, B., van der Ven, H., Polar body biopsy: a viable alternative to preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Reprod Biomed Online 18 (2009), 6–11.
12. 12 Mastenbroek, S., Twisk, M., van Echten-Arends, J., Sikkema-Raddatz, B., Korevaar, J.C., Verhoeve, H.R., et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 357 (2007), 9–17.
13. 13 Treff, N.R., Tao, X., Ferry, K.M., Su, J., Taylor, D., Scott, R.T., Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril 97 (2012), 819–824.
14. 14 Tao, X., Devkota, B., Lonczak, A., Lebiedzinski, M., Scott, R.T., Treff, N.R., Characterization of trophectoderm biopsy cell number. Fertil Steril 100 (2013), S196–S197.
15. 15 Nakashima, A., Araki, R., Tani, H., Ishihara, O., Kuwahara, A., Irahara, M., et al. Implications of assisted reproductive technologies on term singleton birth weight: an analysis of 25,777 children in the national assisted reproduction registry of Japan. Fertil Steril 99 (2013), 450–455.
16. 16 Heitmann, R.J., Hill, M.J., Richter, K.S., DeCherney, A.H., Widra, E.A., The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet 30 (2013), 563–567.
17. 17 Life Technologies. Real-time PCR handbook. Available at: www.gene-quantification.com/real-time-pcr-handbook-life-technologies-update-flr.pdf. Accessed August 11, 2016.
18. 18 Gustin, S.F., Zhao, O., Behr, B., Lathi, R.B., Leveling the playing field—embryo transfers after trophectoderm biopsy have similar outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles. Fertil Steril 100 (2013), S194–S195.
19. 19 Gardner, D.K., Lane, M., Stevens, J., Schlenker, T., Schoolcraft, W.B., Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 73 (2000), 1155–1158.
20. 20 Balaban, B., Yakin, K., Urman, B., Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems. Fertil Steril 85 (2006), 559–563.
21. 21 Capalbo, A., Rienzi, L., Cimadomo, D., Maggiulli, R., Elliott, T., Wright, G., et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod 29 (2014), 1173–1181.
22. 22 Yang, X., Runge, A., Leung, T., Cedars, M., Rosen, M., The development rate of the euploid embryo has a more significant impact on implantation than morphology. Fertil Steril, 106, 2016, S338.