On the representation of automation using a work domain analysis

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 509-530

  Mazaeva, Natalia ^a   Bisantz, Ann M ^a  

^a State University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

Abstraction hierarchy; Automation; Decision ladder; Work domain analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007889258     PISSN: 1463922X     EISSN: 1464536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14639220600647816     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bainbridge, L., 1983, Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, pp. 775-779.
2. Bisantz, A.M., Roth, E., Brickman, B., Gosbee, L.L., Hettinger, L. and McKinney, J., 2003, Integrating cognitive analysis in a large-scale system design process. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, pp. 177-206.
3. Bisantz, A.M., Burns, C.M. and Roth, E., 2002, Validating methods in cognitive engineering: a comparison of two work domain models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, pp. 521-525 (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
4. Burns, C.M., Barsalou, E., Handler, C., Kuo, J. and Harrigan, K., 2000, A work domain analysis for network management. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, Vol. 1, pp. 469-472 (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
5. Burns, C.M. and Vicente, K.J., 2001, Model-based approaches to analyzing cognitive work: a comparison of abstraction-hierarchy, Multilevel flow modelling, and decision ladder modeling. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, pp. 357-366.
6. Burns, C.M., Bryant, D. and Chalmers, B., 2000, A work domain model to support naval command and control. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3, pp. 2228-2233.
7. Burns, C.M., Bryant, D. and Chalmers, B., 2002, Assessment of the TADMUS DSS with work domain analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, pp. 453-457 (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
8. Burns, C.M., Bisantz, A.M. and Roth, E.M., 2004, Lessons from a comparison of work domain models: representational choices and their implications. Human Factors, 46(4), pp. 711-727.
9. Burns, C.M. and Hajdukiewicz, J., 2004, Ecological Interface Design (London: CRC Press).
10. Elm, W.C., Potter, S.S., Gualtieri, J.W., Easter, J.R. and Roth, E.M., 2003, Applied cognitive work analysis: a pragmatic methodology for designing revolutionary cognitive affordances. In Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, E. Hollnagel (Ed.), pp. 357-382 (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
11. Endsley, M., 1996, Automation and situation awareness. In Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications, R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua (Eds), pp. 163-182 (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
12. Endsley, M., Bolte, B. and Jones, D., 2003, Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design (London: Taylor and Francis).
13. Ho, D. and Burns, C.M., 2003, Ecological interface design in aviation domain: work domain analysis of automated collision detection and avoidance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting, pp. 119-123 (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
14. Horder, A., 1971, The Manual of Photography (New York: Focal Press Limited).
15. Mazaeva, N. and Bisantz, A.M., 2003, Modeling automation within an abstraction Hierarchy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting, pp. 649-652 (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
16. Mitchell, C.M. and Miller, R.A., 1986, A discrete control model of operator function: a methodology for information display. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 16, pp. 343-357.
17. Nadimian, R.M., Griffiths, S. and Burns, C.M., 2002, Ecological interface design in aviation domains: work domain analysis and instrumentation availability of the Harvard aircraft. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, pp. 116-120 (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
18. Naikar, N. and Sanderson, P., 2001, Evaluating design proposals for complex systems with work domain analysis. Human Factors, 43, pp. 529-542.
19. Naikar, N., Pearce, B., Drumm, D. and Sanderson, P.M., 2003, Designing teams for first-of-a-kind complex systems using the initial phases of cognitive work analysis: case study. Human Factors, 42, pp. 202-217.
20. Parasuraman, R., 1987, Human-computer monitoring. Human Factors, 29, pp. 695-706.
21. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., Molloy, R. and Hilburn, B., 1996, Monitoring of automated systems. In Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications, R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua (Eds), pp. 91-116 (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
22. Parasuraman, R. and Riley, V., 1997, Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, pp. 230-253.
23. Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. and Goodstein, L., 1994, Cognitive Systems Engineering (New York: Wiley).
24. Rasmussen, J., 1974, The human data processors a system components: bits and pieces of a model. Report No. Riso-M-1722, Danish Atomic Energy Commission, Roskilde, Denmark.
25. Rasmussen, J., 1976, Outlines of a hybrid model of the process plant operator. In Monitoring Behaviour and Supervisory Control, T.B. Sheridan and G. Johannsen (Eds), pp. 371-383 (New York: Plenum).
26. Rasmussen, J., 1985, The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision-making and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 15, pp. 234-243.
27. Rasmussen, J. and Goodstein, L.P., 1987, Decision support in supervisory control of high-risk industrial systems. Automatica, 23, pp. 663-671.
28. Reising, D.L. and Sanderson, P.M., 2002a, Work domain analysis and sensors I: principles and example. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, pp. 569-596.
29. Reising, D.L. and Sanderson, P.M., 2002b, Work domain analysis and sensors II: pasteurizer II case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, pp. 567-637.
30. Sanderson, P.M., Naikar, N., Lintern, G. and Goss, S., 1999, Use of cognitive work analysis across the system life cycle: from requirements to decommissioning. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Vol. 1, pp. 318-322 (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
31. Sanderson, P.M. and Naikar, N., 2000, Temporal coordination control task analysis for analyzing human-system integration. Proceedings of the IEA2000jHFES 2000 Congress, Vol. 1, pp. 206-209 (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
32. Sarter, N.B. and Woods, D.D., 2000, Team play with a powerful independent agent: a full mission simulation study. Human Factors, 42, pp. 390-402.
33. Vakil, S.S. and Hansman, R.J., 2002, Approaches to mitigating complexity-driven issues in commercial autoflight systems. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 75, pp. 133-145.
34. Vicente, K.J., 1999, Cognitive Work Analysis. Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer- based Work (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.).
35. Vicente, K.J., 2002, Ecological interface design: progress and challenges. Human Factors, 44, pp. 62-78.
36. Wickens, C.D., Mavor, A.S. and McGee, J.P., 1997, Flight to the Future: Human Factors in Air Traffic Control (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).