Almost speaking a new rhetoric: The strangeness of the text of la nouvelle rhétorique

Southern Communication Journal

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-45

  Arthos, John ^a  

^a DENISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007839985     PISSN: 1041794X     EISSN: 19303203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10417940409373310     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aristotle. (1926a). TheNichomachean ethics (H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Aristotle. (1926b). The rhetoric (J. H. Freese, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Arnold, C. (1986). Implications of Perelman’s theory of argumentation for theory of persuasion. In: j. L. Golden & T. I. Pilotta (Eds.), Practical reasoning in human affairs: Studies in honor of Chaïm Perelman (pp. 37-52). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
4. Brockriede, W. (1986). Arguing: The art of being human. In J. L. Golden &J.J. Pilotta (Eds.), Practical reasoning in human affairs: Studies in honor of Chaïm Perelman (pp. 53-68). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
5. Bruns, G. L. (1992). Hermeneutics ancient and modem. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Crosswhite, J. (1996). The rhetoric of reason. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Déaut, R. L. (1982). The message of the New Testament and the Aramaic Bible (Targum) (S. F. Miletic, Trans.). Rome: Biblical Institute Press.
8. Farrell, T. B. (1993). Norms of rhetorical culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9. Foss, S. K., Foss, K. A., & Trapp, R. (1985). Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
10. Frank, D. A. (1997). The new rhetoric, Judaism, and post-Enlightenment thought: The cultural origins of Perelmanian philosophy. Quarterly foumal of Speech, 83, 311-331.
11. Frank, D. A. (1998). Dialectical rapprochement in the new rhetoric. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34, 111-117.
12. Gadamer, H. G. (1993). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum Press.
13. Gaonkar, D. (1997). Close readings of the third kind: Reply to my critics. In A. G. Gross & W. M. Keith (Eds.), Rhetorical hermeneutics: Invention and interpretation in the age of science (pp. 330-356). Albany: State University of New York Press.
14. Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity (F. G. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action (C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hahn, L. E. (Ed.). (2000). Perspectives on Habermas. Chicago: Open Court Press.
17. Heidegger, M. (2001). Phenomenological interpretations of Aristotle (R. Rojcewicz, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18. Kadushin, M. (1965). The rabbinic mind (2nd ed). New York: Blaisdell.
19. Madison, G. B. (2000). Critical theory and hermeneutics: Some outstanding issues in the debate. In L. E. Hahn (Ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (pp. 463-486). Chicago: Open Court Press.
20. Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, M. (1972). New techniques of persuasion. New York: Harper and Row.
21. McGee, M. C. (1999). In search of‘the people’: A rhetorical alternative. In j. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit, & S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader (pp. 341-356). New York: Guilford Press.
22. Perelman, C. (1963). The idea of justice and the problem of argument. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
23. Perelman, C. (1967). Justice. New York: Random House.
24. Perelman, C. (1979). The new rhetoric and the humanities. Boston: D. Reidel.
25. Perelman, C. (1982). The realm of rhetoric (W. Kluback, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
26. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). La nouvelle rhétorique: Traité de l’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
27. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
28. Robinson, G. (2000). Essential Judaism: A complete guide to beliefs, customs, and rituals. New York: Pocket Books.
29. Scott, R. L. (1967). On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Central States Speech Journal 18, 9-17.
30. Scult, A. (1976). Perelman’s universal audience: One perspective. Central States Speech Journal, 27, 176-180.
31. Stone, S. L. (1993). In pursuit of the counter-text: The turn to the Jewish legal model in contemporary American legal theory. Harvard Law Remew, 106, 813-895.
32. Tindale, C. W. (1999). Acts of arguing: A rhetorical model of argument. Albany: State University of New York Press.
33. Warnick, B. (1997). Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s contribution to The New Rhetoric. In M. M. Wertheimer (Ed.), Listening to their voices: The rhetorical activities of historical women (pp. 69-85). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.