The new rhetoric, judaism, and post-enlightenment thought: The cultural origins of perelmanian philosophy

Quarterly Journal of Speech

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 311-331

  Frank, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Argument; Jewish thought; Perelman; Post Enlightenment; Talmudic tradition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346543421     PISSN: 00335630     EISSN: 14795779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00335639709384188     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Arendt, Hannah. Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Bracejovanovich, 1973.
2. Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1958.
3. Barthes, Roland. A Barthes Reader. Ed. Susan Sontag. New York: Hill and Wang, 1982.
4. Baruk, Henri. Hebraic Civilizfltion and the Science of Man. London: World Federation for Mental Health, 1961.
5. Baruk, Henri. Tsedek. Binghamton: Swan House, 1972.
6. Bataille, Georges. Visions of Excess. U Minnesota P, 1985.
7. Baudrillard, Jean. Simulations. St. Louis: Telos, 1983.
8. Bauman, Zygmunt. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca: Cornell U P, 1989.
9. Bernstein, Richard J. The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modemity/Postmodemity. Cambridge: MIT P, 1992.
10. Blanchot, Maurice. TheBlanchot Reader. Ed. Michael Holland. Cambridge: 1995.
11. Briand, Michael. “Postmodernism and Politics: Skepticism or Fra.gma.tism?” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 9 (1995): 111-24.
12. Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall. U Berkeley P, 1984.
13. Cohn, Haim H. ‘Justice.” Contemporary Jewish Religious Thought. Ed. Arthur A. Cohen and Paul Mendes-Flohr. New York: Scribner’s, 1987.515-20.
14. Cover, Robert M. “Obligation: AJewish Jurisprudence of the Social Order.” The Journal of Law and Religion 5 (1987): 65-74.
15. Critchley, Simon. The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida andLevinas. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1992.
16. Crosswhite, James. “Being Unreasonable: Perelman and the Problem of Fallacies.” Argumentation 7 (1993): 385-402.
17. Crosswhite, James. “Reason as Justice: Chaim Perelman and the Justification of Rhetoric.” Paper presented to the International Society for the History of Rhetoric, Turin Italy, 1994.
18. Crosswhite, James. The Rhetoric of Reason. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1996.
19. Crosswhite, James. “Universality in Rhetoric: Perelman’s Universal Audience.” Philosophy and Rhetoric. 22 (1989): 157-73.
20. Culler, Jonathan. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell U P, 1982.
21. Dearin, Ray D. Introduction. The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman: Statement and Response. Ed. Ray D. Dearin. Lanham: UP of America, 1989. 1-8.
22. Dearin, Ray D. ‘Justice and Justification in the New Rhetoric.” Practical Reasoning in Human Affairs. Ed. James L. Golden andjosephj. Pilotta. Boston: Reidel, 1986. 155-186.
23. Dearin, Ray D. “Perelman’s Concept of Quasi-Logical Argument: A Critical Elaboration.” The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman: Statement and Response. Ed. Ray D. Dearin. Lanham: U P of America, 1989. 201-219.
24. Deleuze, Gilles. The Logic of Sense. New York: Columbia UP, 1990.
25. DeMan, Paul. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1983.
26. Derrida, Jacques. “The Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’.” Trans. M. Quaintance. Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. Ed. David Gray Carlson, Drucilla Cornell and Michel Rosenfeld. New York: Routledge, 1992,3-67.
27. Derrida, Jacques. “White Mythology.” New Literary History (1974): 5-74.
28. Descartes, Rene. Descartes'Philosophical Writings. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan, 1952.
29. Docherty, Thomas. “Postmodernism: An Introduction.” Postmodernism: A Reader. Ed. Thomas Docherty. New York: ColumbiaUP, 1993. 1-31.
30. Eagleton, Terry. “Awakening from Modernity.” Times Literary Supplement ll Feb. 1987: 194.
31. Ede, lisa S. “Rhetoric vs. Philosophy: The Role of the Universal Audience in Chaim Perelman’s The New Rhetoric." Central States Speech Journals (1981): 118-25.
32. Eemeren, Frans H., van. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992.
33. Eemeren, Frans H., van. and Rob Grootendorst. “Perelman and the Fallacies.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (1995): 122-33.
34. Englard, Izhak. “Majority Opinion vs. Individual Truth: The Oven Interpretations of the ‘Oven of Achnai’ Aggadah.” Tradition 15 (1965): 140-56.
35. Epstein, Isadore. The Babylonian Talmud. London: Soncino, 1948.
36. Fairlamb, Horace L. Critical Conditions: Postmodemity and the Question of Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge U P, 1994.
37. Farrell, Thomas B. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven: Yale U P, 1993.
38. Foss, Sonja K., Karen A. Foss, and Robert Trapp. Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric. Prospect Heights: Waveland, 1991.
39. Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaelology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage, 1973.
40. Giddens, Anthony. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford U P, 1990.
41. Golden, James L., Goodwin F. Berquist, and William E. Coleman. The Rhetoric of Western Thought. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt, 1992.
42. Goldin, Judah. “On the Account of the Banning of R. Elizer Ben Hyrkanus: An Analysis and Proposal.”/oarnai of the Ancient Near East Society 16-17 (1984-85): 85-97.
43. Goodheart, Eugene. The Skeptic Disposition: Deconstruction, Ideology, and Other Matters. Princeton: Princeton U P, 1991.
44. Halivni, David. Midrash, Mishnah and Gemara: Thejewish Prediction for Justified Law. Cambridge: Harvard U P, 1986.
45. Handelman, Susan. Fragments of Redemption. Bloomington: Indiana U P, 1991.
46. Handelman, Susan. The Slayers of Moses: The Emergence of Rabbinic Interpretation in Modem Literary Theoiry. Albany: State U of New York P, 1982.
47. Harvey, David. The Condition of Postmodemity: An Enquiry into the Origim of Cultural Change. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1989.
48. Heschel, Abraham Joshua. The Insecurity of Freedom. New York: Schocken, 1975.
49. Heschel, Abraham Joshua. TheProphets. New York: Burning Bush Press, 1962.
50. Horkheimer, Max. “The End of Reason.” The Essential Frankfurt School Reader. Ed. Andrew Arato and Eike Gebhardt. New York: Urizen Books, 1978.26-47.
51. Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. John Cumming. New York: Seabury Press, 1972.
52. Irigaray, Luce. The bigamy Reader. Ed. Margaret Whitford. Cambridge: Basil, 1991.
53. Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke U P, 1991.
54. Jay, Martin. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: U of California P, 1993.
55. Kluback, William, and Mortimer Becker. “The Significance of Chaim Perelman’s Philosophy of Rhetoric.” Revue Internationale Philosophic33 (1979): 33-46.
56. Knust, Arnold. “An Overlooked Type of Inference.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental African Studies 10 (1942): 976-91.
57. Kraemer, David. The Mind of the Talmud. New York: Oxford U P, 1990.
58. Kren, George M., and Leon Rappoport. The Holocaust and the Crisis of Human Behavior. New York: Holmes & Meier, 1980.
59. Kristeva, Julia. In the Beginning Was Love: Psychoanalysis and Faith. New York: Columbia UP, 1987.
60. Laytner, Anson. Arguing with God. Northvale: Aronson, 1990.
61. Levinas, Emmanuel. Collected Philosophical Papers. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Dordrecht: Martinus NijhofT, 1987.
62. Levinas, Emmanuel. Otherwise Than Being: or, Beyond Essence. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Hague: Martinus NijhofT, 1981.
63. Lucy, Niall. Debating Derrida. Victoria: Melbourne U P, 1995.
64. Lyotard, Jean-Francois. ‘Jewish Oedipus.” Genre 10 (1977): 395-411.
65. Lyotard, Jean-Francois. The Postmodern Condition. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Massum Brian. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.
66. Maneli, Mieczyslaw. Perelman’s New Rhetoric as Philosophy and Methodology for the Next Century. Boston: Kluwer, 1995.
67. Maneli, Mieczyslaw. Personal interview. 4 April 1994.
68. Mattis-Perelman, Noemi. Personal interview. 4 Feb. 1994.
69. Measell, James S. “Perelman on Analogy.” Argumentation and Advocacy 22 (1985): 65-71.