메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 316, Issue 7137, 1998, Pages 1036-

Unscientific practice flourishes in science: Impact factors of journals should not be used in research assessment

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 85007753858     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7137.1036     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (3)

References (3)
  • 1
    • 0031049280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
    • Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997; 314: 498-502.
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 498-502
    • Seglen, P.O.1
  • 2
    • 0032481796 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: The United Kingdom's research assessment exercise
    • Williams G. Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: The United Kingdom's research assessment exercise. BMJ 1998; 316: 1079-1082.
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.316 , pp. 1079-1082
    • Williams, G.1
  • 3
    • 0029783235 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How can impact factors be improved?
    • Garfield E. How can impact factors be improved? BMJ 1996; 313: 411-413.
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.313 , pp. 411-413
    • Garfield, E.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.