Photogrammetric measurement of tree stems from vertical fisheye images

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 737-747

  Berveglieri, Adilson ^a   Tommaselli, Antonio ^a   Liang, Xinlian ^b,c   Honkavaara, Eija ^b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b FINNISH GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c ACADEMY OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

bundle adjustment; circle fitting; DBH; photogrammetry; vertical images

Indexed keywords

PHOTOGRAMMETRY;

AUTOMATIC TECHNIQUE; BUNDLE ADJUSTMENTS; CIRCLE FITTING; DIAMETER-AT-BREAST HEIGHTS; MANUAL MEASUREMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MEASUREMENTS; TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING; VERTICAL IMAGES;

FORESTRY;

IMAGES; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; STEMS;

EID: 85007471125     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2016.1273381     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Berveglieri A, Oliveira RA, Tommaselli AMG., 2014. A feasibility study on the measurement of tree trunks in forests using multi-scale vertical images. In: International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, ISPRS Technical Commission V Symposium, Riva del Garda, Italy; p. 87–92.
2. Brown DC., 1971. Close-range calibration. Photogramm Eng. 37:855–866.
3. Clark NA, Wynne RH, Schmoldt DL, Winn MF., 2000. An assessment of the utility of a non-metric digital camera for measuring standing trees. Comput Electron Agric. 28:151–169. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00125-3
4. Coope ID., 1993. Circle fitting by linear and nonlinear least squares. J Optim Theory Appl. 76:381–388. doi: 10.1007/BF00939613
5. Dassot M, Constant T, Fournier M., 2011. The use of terrestrial LiDAR technology in forest science: application fields, benefits and challenges. Ann For Sci. 68:959–974. doi: 10.1007/s13595-011-0102-2
6. Dick AR, Kershaw JA, MacLean DA., 2010. Spatial tree mapping using photography. North J Appl For. 27:68–74.
7. Evans GD, Coombe DE., 1959. Hemispherical and woodland canopy photography and the light climate. J Ecol. 47:103–113. doi: 10.2307/2257250
8. Forsman M, Börlin N, Holmgren J., 2012. Estimation of tree stem attributes using terrestrial photogrammetry. In: International archives of photogrammetry and remote sensing. XXII ISPRS Congress. ISPRS, Melbourne; p. 261–265.
9. Forsman M, Börlin N, Holmgren J., 2016. Estimation of tree stem attributes using terrestrial photogrammetry with a camera rig. Forests. 7:61–81. doi: 10.3390/f7030061
10. Garrido-Jurado S, Muñoz-Salinas R, Madrid-Cuevas FJ, Marín-Jiménez MJ., 2014. Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion. Pattern Recognit. 47:2280–2292. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.01.005
11. Hapca AI, Mothe F, Leban J-M., 2007. A digital photographic method for 3D reconstruction of standing tree shape. Ann For Sci. 64:631–637. doi: 10.1051/forest:2007041
12. Henning JG, Radtke PJ., 2006. Ground-based laser imaging for assessing three-dimensional forest canopy structure. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 72:1349–1358. doi: 10.14358/PERS.72.12.1349
13. Herrera PJ, Pajares G, Guijarro M, Ruz JJ, Cruz JM., 2011. A stereovision matching strategy for images captured with fish-eye lenses in forest environments. Sensors. 11:1756–1783. doi: 10.3390/s110201756
14. Kittler J, Illingworth J., 1986. Minimum error thresholding. Pattern Recognit. 19:41–47. doi: 10.1016/0031-3203(86)90030-0
15. Korpela I, Tuomola T, Välimäki E., 2007. Mapping forest plots: an efficient method combining photogrammetry and field triangulation. Silva Fenn. 41:457–469. doi: 10.14214/sf.283
16. Kraus K., 1993. Photogrammetry: fundamentals and standard processes. Köln: Dümmler.
17. Liang X, Hyyppä J., 2013. Automatic stem mapping by merging several terrestrial laser scans at the feature and decision levels. Sensors. 13:1614–1634. doi: 10.3390/s130201614
18. Liang X, Jaakkola A, Wang Y, Hyyppä J, Honkavaara E, Liu J, Kaartinen H., 2014. The use of a hand-held camera for individual tree 3D mapping in forest sample plots. Remote Sens. 6:6587–6603. doi: 10.3390/rs6076587
19. Liang X, Litkey P, Hyyppa J, Kaartinen H, Vastaranta M, Holopainen M., 2012. Automatic stem mapping using single-scan terrestrial laser scanning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 50:661–670. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2161613
20. Liang X, Wang Y, Jaakkola A, Kukko A, Kaartinen H, Hyyppä J, Honkavaara E, Liu J., 2015. Forest data collection using terrestrial image-based point clouds from a handheld camera compared to terrestrial and personal laser scanning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 53:5117–5132. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2417316
21. Lindberg E, Holmgren J, Olofsson K, Olsson H., 2012. Estimation of stem attributes using a combination of terrestrial and airborne laser scanning. Eur J For Res. 131:1917–1931. doi: 10.1007/s10342-012-0642-5
22. Lovell JL, Jupp DLB, Newnham GJ, Culvenor DS., 2011. Measuring tree stem diameters using intensity profiles from ground-based scanning lidar from a fixed viewpoint. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 66:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.08.006
23. Lowe DG., 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis. 60:91–110. doi: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94
24. Lowe DG., 2005. Demo software: SIFT keypoint detector. [cited 2015 Nov 9]. Available from: http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~lowe/keypoints/
25. Marcato Junior J, Moraes MVA, Tommaselli AMG., 2015. Experimental assessment of techniques for fisheye camera calibration. Bol Ciênc Geodésicas. 21:637–651.
26. Mikhail EM, Bethel JS, McGlone CJ., 2001. Introduction to modern photogrammetry. New York: Wiley.
27. Ringdahl O, Hohnloser P, Hellström T, Holmgren J, Lindroos O., 2013. Enhanced algorithms for estimating tree trunk diameter using 2D laser scanner. Remote Sens. 5:4839–4856. doi: 10.3390/rs5104839
28. Rodríguez-García C, Montes F, Ruiz F, Cañellas I, Pita P., 2014. Stem mapping and estimating standing volume from stereoscopic hemispherical images. Forstwiss Cent. 133:895–904.
29. Ruy R, Tommaselli AMG, Galo M, Hasegawa JK, Reis TT., 2009. Evaluation of bundle block adjustment with additional parameters using images acquired by SAAPI system. In: Proceedings of 6th international symposium on mobile mapping technology. Presidente Prudente, Brazil.
30. Schneider D, Schwalbe E, Maas HG., 2009. Validation of geometric models for fisheye lenses. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 64:259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.01.001
31. Silva SLA, Tommaselli AMG, Artero AO., 2014. Utilização de alvos codificados na automação do processo de calibração de câmaras. Bol Ciênc Geodésicas. 20:636–656.
32. Tommaselli AMG, Berveglieri A., 2014. Automatic orientation of multi-scale terrestrial images for 3D reconstruction. Remote Sens. 6:3020–3040. doi: 10.3390/rs6043020
33. Vastaranta M, Melkas T, Holopainen M, Kaartinen H, Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H., 2009. Laser-based field measurements in tree-level forest data acquisition. Photogramm J Finl. 21:51–61.
34. Watt PJ, Donoghue DNM., 2005. Measuring forest structure with terrestrial laser scanning. Int J Remote Sens. 26:1437–1446. doi: 10.1080/01431160512331337961
35. Wolf PR, Dewitt BA, Wilkinson BE., 2014. Elements of photogrammetry with applications in GIS. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Yen J-C, Chang F-J, Chang S., 1995. A new criterion for automatic multilevel thresholding. IEEE Trans Image Process. 4:370–378. doi: 10.1109/83.366472