Erratum to: Brief exposure to Pope Francis heightens moral beliefs about climate change (Climatic Change, (2017), 141, 2, (167-177), 10.1007/s10584-016-1893-9);Brief exposure to Pope Francis heightens moral beliefs about climate change

Climatic Change

Volumn 141, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 167-177

  Schuldt, Jonathon P ^a   Pearson, Adam R ^b   Romero Canyas, Rainer ^c   Larson Konar, Dylan ^c  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b POMONA COLLEGE   (United States)

^c ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES; GLOBAL COMMUNITY; INFLUENCE ON CLIMATE; PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY; PUBLIC OPINIONS; SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH; TREATMENT EFFECTS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; MITIGATION; MORALITY; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RESEARCH WORK;

EID: 85007439389     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: 15731480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1921-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Bargh JA, Morsella E (2008) The unconscious mind. Perspect Psychol Sci 3(1):73–79
2. Burke M, Hsiang SM, Miguel E (2015) Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature 527:235–239
3. Clements JM, McCright AM, Xiao C (2014) Green Christians? An empirical examination of environmental concern within the US general public. Organ Environ 27(1):85–102
4. Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol Sci 24(1):56–62
5. Fishbein M, Yzer MC (2003) Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Commun Theory 13(2):164–183
6. Francis P (2015) On Care for our common home. Vatican City, Italy: Encyclical Letter, Libreria Editrice Vaticana. [Accessed 07-08-2016] Available online at http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papafrancesco_20150524_enciclicalaudato-si.html
7. Graham J, Meindl P, Beall E, Johnson KM, Zhang L (2016) Cultural differences in moral judgment and behavior, across and within societies. Curr Opin Psychol 8:125–130
8. Haidt J (2007) The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 316(5827):998–1002
9. Hamilton LC, Hartter J, Lemcke-Stampone M, Moore DW, Safford TG (2015) Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0138208
10. Higgins ET (1989) Knowledge accessibility and activation: subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. Unintended Thought 3:75–123
11. Hornik R, Woolf KD (1999) Using cross-sectional surveys to plan message strategies. Soc Mark Q 5(2):34–41
12. Jones RP, Cox D & Navarro-Rivera J (2014) Believers, sympathizers, and skeptics: why Americans are conflicted about climate change, environmental policy and science: findings from the PRRI/AAR religions, values, and climate change survey. Public Religion Research Institute and American Academy of Religion. Released November 22, 2014
13. Leiserowitz A, & Akerlof K (2010) Race, ethnicity and public responses to climate change. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
14. Li N, Hilgard J, Scheufele DA, Winneg KM, Jamieson KH (2016) Cross-pressuring conservative Catholics? Effects of Pope Francis’ encyclical on the US public opinion on climate change. Clim Chang 139:367–380
15. Loersch C, Payne BK (2011) The situated inference model: an integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspect Psychol Sci 6(3):234–252
16. Maibach E, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Myers T, Rosenthal S & Feinberg G (2015) The Francis effect: how Pope Francis changed the conversation about global warming. George Mason University and Yale University. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication
17. Markowitz EM (2012) Is climate change an ethical issue? Examining young adults’ beliefs about climate and morality. Clim Chang 114(3–4):479–495
18. McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52(2):155–194
19. Nisbet MC, Markowitz EM & Kotcher JE (2012) Winning the conversation: framing and moral messaging in environmental campaigns. Talking Green: Exploring Contemporary Issues in Environmental Communications, 9–36
20. O’Neill E (2016) The Pope and the environment: towards an integral ecology? Environ Polit 25(4):749–754
21. Pew (2014) Pope Francis’ image positive in much of the world. Available online at http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/12/11/pope-francis-image-positive-in-much-of-world/
22. Roser-Renouf C, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A & Rosenthal S (2016) Global warming, God, and the “end times”: March, 2016. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
23. Rottman J, Kelemen D, Young L (2015) Hindering harm and preserving purity: how can moral psychology save the planet? Philos Compass 10(2):134–144
24. Schuldt JP, Pearson AR (2016) The role of race and ethnicity in climate change polarization: evidence from a U.S. national survey experiment. Clim Chang 136:495–505
25. Schuman H & Presser S (1996) Questions and answers in attitude surveys: experiments on question form, wording, and context. Sage
26. Schwarz N (1998) Accessible content and accessibility experiences: the interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 2(2):87–99
27. Schwarz N (1999) Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 54(2):93–105
28. Srull TK, Wyer RS (1979) The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: some determinants and implications. J Pers Soc Psychol 37(10):1660–1672
29. Stern PC, Dietz T, Black JS (1985) Support for environmental protection: the role of moral norms. Popul Environ 8(3–4):204–222
30. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel TD, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6(2):81–97
31. Suhay E, Druckman JN (2015) The politics of science political values and the production, communication, and reception of scientific knowledge. Ann Am Acade Polit Soc Sci 658(1):6–15
32. Tourangeau R, Rips LJ & Rasinski K (2000) The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press
33. Van Zant AB, Moore DA (2015) Leaders’ use of moral justifications increases policy support. Psychol Sci 26(6):934–943
34. Wardekker JA, Petersen AC, van Der Sluijs JP (2009) Ethics and public perception of climate change: exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate. Glob Environ Chang 19(4):512–521
35. Wolsko C, Ariceaga H, Seiden J (2016) Red, white, and blue enough to be green: effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol 65:7–19