Rosalind’s Ghost: Biology, Collaboration, and the Female

PLoS Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2016, Pages

  Wagner, Caroline ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CAREER MOBILITY; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; GENDER BIAS; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; BIOLOGY; FEMALE;

BIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS;

EID: 85007343523     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001003     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Lariviere V, Ni C, Gingras Y, Cronin B, Sugimoto CR, Global gender disparities in science. Nature. 2013;504:211–13. 24350369
2. Topaz CM, Sen S, Gender Representation on Journal Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(8): e0161357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.016135727536970
3. Lincoln A, Pincus S, Koster JB, Leboy P, Data sources: The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990 and 2000s. Soc Stud Sci. 2012;42(2):307–20; Nobel Library (online); Fields Medal library (online). 22849001
4. National Science Foundation, SESTAT, 2014, Table 7–1 www.nsf.gov/nsb/sei/edTool/datatables/workforce-07-1.xls
5. Zeng XHT, Duch J, Sales-Pardo M, Moreira JAG, Radicchi F, Ribeiro HV, et al. Differences in Collaboration Patterns Across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender. PLoS Biol. 2016;
6. Wagner CS, Horlings E, Whetsell TA, Mattsson P, Nordqvist K, Do Nobel Laureates Create Prize-Winning Networks? An Analysis of Collaborative Research in Physiology or Medicine. PLoS ONE. 2015Jul;10(7):1–13.
7. Kummerli R, Colliard C, Fiechter N, Petitpierre B, Russier F, Keller L, Human cooperation in social dilemmas: comparing the snowdrift game with the prisoner's dilemma. Proc Roy Soc B. 2007;274:2965–70.
8. Goulden M, Mason M, Frasch K, Keeping women in the science pipeline. Ann Am Ac Pol Soc Sci. 2011;638: 141–62.
9. Zuckerman H, Cole J, Women in American science. Minerva.1975;13(1):82–102.
10. Handelsman J, Cantor N, Carnes M, Denton D, Fine E, Grosz B, et al. More women in science. Science. 2005Aug;309(5738):1190–91. doi: 10.1126/science.111325216109868
11. Easterly DM, Ricard C, Conscious Efforts to End Unconscious Bias: Why Women Leave Academic Research. J Res Admin. 2011;42(1):61–73.
12. Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J, Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Pro Nat Aca Sci. 2012109(41):16475–79.
13. Wagner C. Bibliography supporting PLOS Primer; 2016. Database: figshare [Internet]. Accessed: https://figshare.com/articles/Bibliography_supporting_PLOS_primer_on_women_in_science/3803640
14. Joseph K., Morgan GP, Martin MK, Carley KM, On the coevolution of stereotype, culture, and social relationships: an agent-based model. Soc Sci Comp Rev. 2014;32(3):295–311.