Using functional or structural magnetic resonance images and personal characteristic data to identify ADHD and autism

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2016, Pages

  Ghiassian, Sina ^a,b   Greiner, Russell ^a,b   Jin, Ping ^a,b   Brown, Matthew R G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; AUTISM; CHILD; CLASSIFIER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STRUCTURAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ALGORITHM; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; MACHINE LEARNING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; AUTISTIC DISORDER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS;

EID: 85007278805     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166934     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease; 2001.
2. World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease; 2010.
3. Edelman RR, Warach S. Magnetic resonance imaging. New England Journal of Medicine. 1993; 328 (10):708-716. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303113281008 PMID: 8433731
4. Huettel SA, Song AW, McCarthy G. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates Sunderland, MA; 2008.
5. ADHD-200 Consortium. The ADHD-200 Sample; 2011. http://fcon-1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/adhd200/
6. ADHD-200 Consortium. ADHD-200 Global Competition Results; 2011. http://fcon-1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/adhd200/results.html
7. ADHD-200 Consortium. The ADHD-200 Consortium: A Model to Advance the Translational Potential of Neuroimaging in Clinical Neuroscience. Front Syst Neurosci. 2012; 6:62. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2012. 00062 PMID: 22973200
8. Brown MR, Sidhu GS, Greiner R, Asgarian N, Bastani M, et al. ADHD-200 Global Competition: Diagnosing ADHD using personal characteristic data can outperform resting state fMRI measurements. Frontiers in systems neuroscience. 2012; 6. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00069 PMID: 23060754
9. Sidhu GS, Asgarian N, Greiner R, Brown MR. Kernel Principal Component Analysis for dimensionality reduction in fMRI-based diagnosis of ADHD. Frontiers in systems neuroscience. 2012; 6. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00074 PMID: 23162439
10. ABIDE. Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange; 2011. http://fcon-1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/abide/
11. Di Martino A, Yan C, Li Q, Denio E, Castellanos F, et al. The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Molecular psychiatry. 2013;.
12. Nielsen JA, Zielinski BA, Fletcher PT, Alexander AL, Lange N, et al. Multisite functional connectivity MRI classification of autism: ABIDE results. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2013; 7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00599 PMID: 24093016
13. Leek JT, Scharpf RB, Bravo HC, Simcha D, Langmead B, et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010; 11(10):733-739. doi: 10.1038/nrg2825 PMID: 20838408
14. Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007; 8(1):118-127. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037 PMID: 16632515
15. Katuwal GJ, Cahill ND, Baum SA, Michael AM. The predictive power of structural MRI in Autism diagnosis. In: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2015. p. 4270-4273.
16. Demirci O, Clark VP, Magnotta VA, Andreasen NC, Lauriello J, et al. A Review of Challenges in the Use of fMRI for Disease Classification/Characterization and A Projection Pursuit Application from Multi-site fMRI Schizophrenia Study. Brain Imaging Behav. 2008; 2(3):147-226. doi: 10.1007/s11682-008-9028-1 PMID: 19562043
17. Nouretdinov I, Costafreda SG, Gammerman A, Chervonenkis A, Vovk V, et al. Machine learning classification with confidence: Application of transductive conformal predictors to MRI-based diagnostic and prognostic markers in depression. Neuroimage. 2011; 56:809-813. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.023 PMID: 20483379
18. Orru G, Pettersson-Yeo W, Marquand AF, Sartori G, Mechelli A. Using Support Vector Machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012; 36(4):1140-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.004 PMID: 22305994
19. Iwabuchi SJ, Liddle PF, Palaniyappan L. Clinical utility of machine-learning approaches in schizophrenia: improving diagnostic confidence for translational neuroimaging. Front Psychiatry. 2013; 4:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00095 PMID: 24009589
20. Peng X, Lin P, Zhang T, Wang J. Extreme learning machine-based classification of ADHD using brain structural MRI data. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11):e79476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079476 PMID: 24260229
21. Wang L, Wee CY, Tang X, Yap PT, Shen D. Multi-task feature selection via supervised canonical graph matching for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2015; p. 1-8.
22. Chen CP, Keown CL, Jahedi A, Nair A, Pflieger ME, Bailey BA, et al. Diagnostic classification of intrinsic functional connectivity highlights somatosensory, default mode, and visual regions in autism. Neuro-Image Clinical. 2015; 8:238-245. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.002 PMID: 26106547
23. Shapiro L, Stockman GC. Computer Vision. 2001. ed: Prentice Hall. 2001;.
24. Chang CW, Ho CC, Chen JH. ADHD classification by a texture analysis of anatomical brain MRI data. Frontiers in systems neuroscience. 2012; 6. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00066 PMID: 23024630
25. Dalal N, Triggs B. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on. vol. 1. IEEE; 2005. p. 886-893.
26. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, 2nd Edition;. Available from: http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/Default/states
27. SPM. Statistical Parametric Mapping, version 8; 2009. http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/
28. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JP, Frith CD, et al. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Human brain mapping. 1994; 2(4):189-210. doi: 10.1002/hbm. 460020402
29. Collins DL, Zijdenbos AP, Baaré WF, Evans AC. ANIMAL+ INSECT: improved cortical structure segmentation. In: Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Springer; 1999. p. 210-223.
30. Fonov V, Evans A, McKinstry R, Almli C, Collins D. Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood. Neuro Image. 2009; 47:S102. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70884-5
31. Fonov V, Evans AC, Botteron K, Almli CR, McKinstry RC, et al. Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. Neuroimage. 2011; 54(1):313-327. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07. 033 PMID: 20656036
32. Vedaldi A, Fulkerson B. VLFeat: An Open and Portable Library of Computer Vision Algorithms; 2008. http://www.vlfeat.org/
33. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J, Hastie T, Friedman J, Tibshirani R. The elements of statistical learning. vol. 2. Springer; 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7
34. Peng H, Long F, Ding C. Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on. 2005; 27(8):1226-1238. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159 PMID: 16119262
35. Ding C, Peng H. Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data. Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology. 2005; 3(02):185-205. doi: 10.1142/S0219720005001004 PMID: 15852500
36. Dey S, Rao AR, Shah M. Attributed graph distance measure for automatic detection of Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disordered subjects. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2014; 8:64. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014. 00064 PMID: 24982615
37. Leek JT, Peng RD. Statistics. What is the question? Science. 2015; 347(6228):1314-1315. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6146 PMID: 25721505
38. Bennett MR, Lagopoulos J. Neurodevelopmental sequelae associated with gray and white matter changes and their cellular basis: A comparison between Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD and dyslexia. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2015; 46:132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.02.007 PMID: 26456538
39. Cody H, Pelphrey K, Piven J. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging of autism. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2002; 20(3-5):421-438. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5748(02)00053-9 PMID: 12175882
40. Cao M, Shu N, Cao Q, Wang Y, He Y. Imaging functional and structural brain connectomics in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Mol Neurobiol. 2014; 50(3):1111-1123. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8685-x PMID: 24705817
41. Minshew NJ, Keller TA. The nature of brain dysfunction in autism: functional brain imaging studies. Curr Opin Neurol. 2010; 23(2):124-130. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833782d4 PMID: 20154614
42. Haufe S, Meinecke F, Gorgen K, Dahne S, Haynes JD, Blankertz B, et al. On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 2014; 87:96-110. doi: 10.1016/j. neuroimage.2013.10.067 PMID: 24239590
43. Wolfers T, Buitelaar JK, Beckmann CF, Franke B, Marquand AF. From estimating activation locality to predicting disorder: A review of pattern recognition for neuroimaging-based psychiatric diagnostics. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015; 57:328-349. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.001 PMID: 26254595