Repetition and prominence: The probabilistic structure of melodic and non-melodic lines

Music Perception

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 152-166

  Duane, Ben ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Counterpoint; Melody; Music and probability; Texture

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007235960     PISSN: 07307829     EISSN: 15338312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/MP.2016.34.2.152     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. BELL, R., ROER, J. P., DENTALE, S., & BUCHNER, A. (2012).Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1542-1557.
2. BIGAND, E., MCADAMS, S., & FORê T, S. (2000). Divided attention in music. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 270-278.
3. BREGMAN, A. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. BREGMAN, A., & RUDNICKY, A. (1975). Auditory segregation: Stream or streams? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 263-267.
5. CAMPBELL, T., BEAMAN, C. P., & BERRY, D. C. (2002). Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption. Memory, 10, 199-214.
6. CLARK, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 1-73.
7. COUNTERMELODY. (2004). In S. Sadie & J. Tyrell (Eds.), The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. COWAN, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. CUDDY, L. L., & LUNNEY, C. A. (1995). Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: Perceptual judgments of melodic continuity Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 451-462.
10. CUSAK, R., DECKS, J., AIKMAN, G., & CARLYON, R. P. (2004). Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 643-656.
11. DOWLING, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85, 341-354.
12. DUANE, B. (2010). Information content in melodic and nonmelodic lines. Paper presented at the International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Seattle, WA.
13. DUANE, B. (2012). Agency and information content in eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century string-quartet expositions. Journal of Music Theory, 56, 87-120.
14. FRISTON, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 815-836.
15. FRISTON, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 293-301.
16. FRISTON, K., KILNER, J., & HARRISON, L. (2006). A free energy principle for the brain. Journal of Physiology, 100, 70-87.
17. HOSMER, D. W., LEMESHOW, S., & COOK, E. (2001). Applied logistic regression. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Press.
18. JONES, D. M. (1993). Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. JONES, D. M., & MACKEN, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce and irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369-381.
20. JONES, D. M., MADDEN, C., & MILES, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 645-669.
21. KNILL, D. C., & POUGET, A. (2004). The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 712-719.
22. MADSEN, S. T., & WIDMER, G. (2006). Music complexity measures predicting the listening experience. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Bologna, Italy.
23. MANZARA, L. C., WITTEN, I. H., & JAMES, M. (1992). On the entropy of music: An experiment with Bach chorale melodies. Leonardo Music Journal, 2, 81-88.
24. NARMOUR, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
25. NARMOUR, E. (1992). The analysis and cognition of melodic complexity: The implication-realization model. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26. PEARCE, M. T.,&WIGGINS, G. A. (2004). Improved methods for statistical modelling of monophonic music. Journal of New Music Research, 33, 367-385.
27. PEARCE, M. T., & WIGGINS, G. A. (2006). Expectation in melody: The influence of context and learning. Music Perception, 23, 377-405.
28. SCHELLENBERG, E. G. (1996). Expectancy in melody: Tests of the implication-realization model. Cognition, 58, 75-125.
29. SHANNON, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
30. TEMPERLEY, D. (2008). A probabalistic model of melody perception. Cognitive Science, 32, 418-444.
31. TREMBLAY, S., NICHOLLS, A. P., ALFORD, D., & JONES, D. M. (2000). The irrelevant sound effect: Does speech play a special role? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1750-1754.
32. VILARES, I., & KORDING, K. (2011). Bayesian models: The structure of the world, uncertainty, behavior, and the brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224, 22-39