Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of patient-reported outcome measures for abdominal aortic aneurysm

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 317-327

  Duncan, R ^a   Essat, M ^a   Jones, G ^b   Booth, A ^a   Buckley Woods, H ^a   Poku, E ^a   Kaltenthaler, E ^a   Keetharuth, A D ^a   Palfreyman, S ^c   Michaels, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b LEEDS METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 85006797303     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10407     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Benson RA, Poole R, Murray S, Moxey P, Loftus IM. Screening results from a large United Kingdom abdominal aortic aneurysm screening center in the context of optimizing United Kingdom National Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme protocols. J Vasc Surg 2015; 63: 1–4.
2. Vardulaki KA, Prevost TC, Walker NM, Day NE, Wilmink ABM, Quick CR et al. Incidence among men of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: estimates from 500 screen detected cases. J Med Screen 1999; 6: 50–54.
3. Waton S, Johal A, Heikkila K, Cromwell D, Loftus I. National Vascular Registry: 2015 Annual Report. Royal College of Surgeons of England: London, 2015.
4. Waton S, Johal A, Groene O, Cromwell D, Mitchell D, Loftus I. Outcomes After Elective Repair of Infra-Renal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Royal College of Surgeons of England: London, 2013.
5. Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ 2010; 340: c186.
6. Macefield RC, Jacobs M, Korfage IJ, Nicklin J, Whistance RN, Brookes ST et al. Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Trials 2014; 15: 1–12.
7. Devlin N, Appleby J. Getting the Most Out of PROMS: Putting Health Outcomes at the Heart of NHS Decision-Making. King's Fund: London, 2010.
8. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. US Food and Drug Administration: Washington, 2009.
9. Liberati A, Altam DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: 22–25.
10. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 1115–1123.
11. McKenna SP. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC Med 2011; 9: 86.
12. Black N, Jenkinson C. Measuring patients' experiences and outcomes. BMJ 2009; 339: b2495.
13. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: 1–74.
14. Lamping DL, Schroter S, Marquis P, Marrel A, Duprat-Lomon I, Sagnier P-P. The community-acquired pneumonia symptom questionnaire: a new, patient-based outcome measure to evaluate symptoms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2002; 122: 920–929.
15. Morris C, Janssens A, Allard A, Thompson Coon J, Shilling V, Tomlinson R et al. Informing the NHS Outcomes Framework: evaluating meaningful health outcomes for children with neurodisability using multiple methods including systematic review, qualitative research, Delphi survey and consensus meeting. Health Serv Delivery Res 2014; 2: 1–224.
16. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34–42.
17. Jenkinson C, Gibbons E, Fitzpatrick R. A Structured Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Stroke. University of Oxford, Medical Science Division: Oxford, 2009.
18. Grant MJ. How does your searching grow? A survey of search preferences and the use of optimal search strategies in the identification of qualitative research. Health Info Libr J 2004; 21: 21–32.
19. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analysing Qualitative Data, Bryman G, Burgess A (eds). Routledge: London, 1994; 173–194.
20. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Making Sense of Evidence; 2006. http://www.casp-uk.net/ [accessed 1 May 2016].
21. Farmer T, Robinson K, Elliott SJ, Eyles J. Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qual Health Res 2006; 16: 377–394.
22. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010; 341: c4587.
23. Peach G, Romaine J, Thompson MM, Hinchliffe RJ, Bradley C. Development and validation of condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of quality of life, symptoms and treatment satisfaction for patients with aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 2014; 101(Suppl 4): 37.
24. Peach G, Romaine J, Holt PJE, Thompson MM, Bradley C, Hinchliffe RJ. Quality of life, symptoms and treatment satisfaction in patients with aortic aneurysm using new abdominal aortic aneurysm-specific patient-reported outcome measures. Br J Surg 2016; 103: 1012–1019.
25. Peach G, Romaine J, Wilson A, Holt PJ, Thompson MM, Hinchliffe RJ et al. Design of new patient-reported outcome measures to assess quality of life, symptoms and treatment satisfaction in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2016; 103: 1003–1011.
26. Borchard KLA, Hewitt PM, Wotherspoon S, Scott AR. Australian Vascular Quality of Life Index (AUSVIQUOL): a pilot study of a disease-specific quality of life measure. ANZ J Surg 2006; 76: 208–213.
27. Mangione CM, Goldman L, Orav EJ, Marcantonio ER, Pedan A, Ludwig LE et al. Health-related quality of life after elective surgery. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 686–697.
28. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 2012; 21: 651–657.
29. COSMIN. COSMIN Checklist. http://www.cosmin.nl/the_cosmin_checklist.html [accessed 1 June 2015].
30. Brännström M, Björck M, Strandberg G, Wanhainen A. Patients' experiences of being informed about having an abdominal aortic aneurysm – a follow-up case study five years after screening. J Vasc Nurs 2009; 27: 70–74.
31. Letterstål A, Olofsson P, Forsberg C. Risk attitude and preferences in person's hypothetically facing open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Nurs 2012; 30: 112–117.
32. Pettersson M, Bergbom I. To be under control. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2013; 28: 387–395.
33. Smith MJ, Borchard KLA, Hinton E, Scott AR. The Australian Vascular Quality of Life Index (AUSVIQUOL): an improved clinical quality of life tool for peripheral vascular disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34: 199–205.
34. Buscemi N, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, Tjosvold L, Klassen TP. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 697–703.
35. Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1635–1640.