Encouraging reflection in preservice teachers through response journals

Teacher Educator

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 254-267

  Good, Jennifer M ^a   Whang, Patricia A ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006623993     PISSN: 08878730     EISSN: 19388101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08878730209555299     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Farris, P. J., and Fuhler, C. J., 1996. Using response journals with preservice teachers. The Clearing House, 70:26–29.
2. Groce, E. C., Henson, R. K., and Woods, B. S., The examination of preservice teachers’ journals for reflective thought patterns concerning professionalism. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. April. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 436 481)
3. Hatton, N., and Smith, D., 1995. Reflection in teacher education:Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11:33–49.
4. Hoshmand, L. L. T., 1994. Orientation to inquiry in a reflective professional psychology, Albany, NY:State University of New York.
5. Holt‐Reynolds, D., 1992. Personal history‐based beliefs as relevant prior knowledge in course work. American Educational Research Journal, 29:325–349.
6. Kerka, S., 1996. Journal writing and adult learning, Report No. EDO‐CE‐96–174 Columbus, OH:ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399 413)
7. Lin, H., Gorrell, J., and Porter, K., The road to preservice teachers’ conceptual change. Paper presented at the meeting of the Mid‐South Educational Research Association. Point Clear, AL. November. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 436 508)
8. Norris, L., 1994. “ Representation and reflection:A preservice teachers understanding of collaborative planning ”. In Making thinking visible:Writing, collaborative planning, and classroom inquiry, Edited by:Flower, L., Wallace, D. L., Norris, L., and Burnett, R. E., 243–255. Urbana, IL:National Council for Teachers of English.
9. Ormrod, J. E., 1998. Educational psychology:Developing learners, Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
10. Parsons, L., 1994. Expanding response journals in all subject areas, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
11. Pritchard, R. J., 1993. Developing writing prompts for reading response and analysis. English Journal, 82(3):24–32.
12. Rosenblatt, L. M., 1978. The reader, the text, the poem:The transactional theory of the literary work, Carbondale, IL:Southern Illinois University Press.
13. Salvatori, M., 1996. Conversations with texts:Reading in the teaching of composition. College English, 58:238–252.
14. Seifert, K. L., 1999. Constructing a psychology of teaching and learning, Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
15. Smith, F., 1995. Between hope and havoc:Essays into human learning and education, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
16. Tishman, S., Perkins, D. N., and Jay, E., 1995. The thinking classroom:Learning and teaching in a culture of thinking, Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
17. Wasserman, S., 1999. Shazam! You're a teacher:Facing the illusory quest for certainty in classroom practice. Phi Delta Kappan, 80:464–468.
18. Wilson, N., 1989. Learning from confusion:Questions and change in reading logs. English Journal, 78(7):62–69.