Issues involved in attempting to develop independent learning in pupils working on technological projects

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 171-183

  Barak, Moshe ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006529779     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0263514042000290886     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bandura A, (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control (New York, Deeman)
2. Barak, M. (2002). Learning good electronics, or coping with challenging tasks? Priorities of excellent pupils. Journal of Technology Education, 14(2): 20-34.
3. Barak, M, and Doppelt, Y. (1999). Integrating the Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) program for creative thinking into a project-based technology curriculum. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(2): 139-151.
4. Barak, M, Waks, S, and Doppelt, Y. (2000). Majoring in technology and fostering learning. Learning Environments Research, 3: 135-138.
5. Barak, M, Yehiav, R, and Mendelson, N. (1994). Advancement of low achievers within technology studies at high school. Research in Science and Technological Education, 12(2): 175-186.
6. Black P, Harrison G, (1985) In place of confusion: technology and science in the school curriculum (London, Trent Polytechnic)
7. Blumenfeld, PC, Soloway, E, Marx, RW, Krajcik, JS, Guzdial, M, and Palinscar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4): 369-398.
8. Bogdan RC, Biklen SK, (1982) Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods (Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon)
9. Cross A, McCormic R, (Eds) (1986) Technology in schools (Milton Keynes, Open University Press)
10. Dewey J, (1963) The child and the curriculum (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press)
11. Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3): 255-272.
12. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE, (1986) Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer (New York, The Free Press)
13. Electronics Workbench (EWB) (2003) Circuit design software Available online at: http://www.electronicsworkbench.com/index.html
14. Guba E, Lincoln YS, (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research in: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, (Eds) Handbook of qualitative research (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications) 105 117
15. Hacker M, Barden R, (1988) Living with technology (Albany, NY, Delmar Publishers, Inc)
16. Harel I, Papert S, (Eds) (1991) Constructionism (Norwood, NJ, Ablex)
17. Hennessey, BA, and Amabile, TM. (1998). Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity. American Psychologist, 53: 674-675.
18. Hoepfl, MC. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: a primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1): 47-63.
19. Johnsey, R. (1995). The design process, does it exist?. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5: 199-217.
20. Johnson, SD. (1997). Learning technological concepts and developing intellectual skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7: 161-180.
21. Kafai Y, Resnick M, (Eds) (1996) Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking and learning in a digital world (Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum)
22. Kimbell, RA. (1994). Tasks in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1: 1-15.
23. Marx, RW, Blumenfeld, PC, Krajcik, JS, and Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. Elementary School Journal, 97(4): 341-58.
24. Maykut P, Morhouse R, (1994) Beginning qualitative research: a philosophic and practical guide (London, The Falmer Press) 126 127
25. Seattle Robotics Society (SRS) (2003) http://www.seattlerobotics.org/
26. Woods P, (1996) Researching the art of teaching: ethnography for educational use (London, Routledge)