Accounting for risk aversion, income distribution and social welfare in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Kind, Jarl ^a   Wouter Botzen, W J ^b,c   Aerts, Jeroen C J H ^b  

^a DELTARES   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

DAMAGE COMPENSATIONS; DIMINISHING MARGINAL UTILITIES; EXPECTED ANNUAL DAMAGES; FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; POLITICAL ECONOMY; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; SOCIAL WELFARE BENEFITS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FLOOD; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; WELFARE PROVISION;

EID: 85006489148     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.446     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Doocy S, Daniels A, Murray S, Kirsch TD. The human impact of floods: a historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Curr 2013, 5. doi:10.1371/currents.dis.f4deb457904936b07c09daa98ee8171a.
2. Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J, Nicholls RJ. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—a global assessment. PLoS One 2015, 10:1–34. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118571.
3. Swiss Re. Sigma, No. 2/2006; 2/2007; 1/2008; 2/2009; 1/2010; 1/2011; 2/2012; 2/2013; 1/2014; 2/2015. Available at: http://www.swissre.com/sigma/. (Accessed April 24, 2015).
4. Hallegatte S, Green C, Nicholls RJ, Corfee-Morlot J. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat Clim Change 2013, 3:802–806. doi:10.1038/nclimate1979.
5. Hinkel J, Lincke D, Vafeidis AT, Perrette M, Nicholls RJ, Tol RSJ, Marzeion B, Fettweis X, Ionescu C, Levermann A. Coastal flood damage and adaptation costs under 21st century sea-level rise. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014, 111:3292–3297. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222469111.
6. Narain U, Margulis S, Essam T. Estimating costs of adaptation to climate change. In: Haites E, ed. International Climate Finance. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2013.
7. Pearce D, Atkinson G, Mourato S. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2006, 315.
8. Porter TM. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1995, 310.
9. Lempert RJ. Embedding (some) benefit-cost concepts into decision support processes with deep uncertainty. J Benefit-Cost Anal 2015, 5-3:487–514. doi:10.1515/jbca-2014-9006.
10. Frontier Economics. The Economics of Climate Resilience: Appraising Flood Management Initiatives—A Case Study. London: Frontier Economics Ltd.; 2013, 109.
11. García LE, Matthews JH, Rodriguez DJ, Wijnen M, Di Francesco KN, Ray P. Beyond downscaling: a bottom-up approach to climate adaptation for water resources management. AGWA Report No. 01, World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2014, 51.
12. Hallegatte S, Shah A, Lempert R, Brown C, Gill S. Investment decision making under deep uncertainty: application to climate change. Policy Research Working Paper No. 6193. World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2012, 39.
13. HM Government (UK). The National Adaptation Programme Report: Analytical Annex. Economics of the National Adaptation Programme. London: DEFRA; 2013, 29.
14. Means E, Laugier M, Daw J, Kaatz LM, Waage MD. Decision Support Planning Methods: Incorporating Climate Change Uncertainties into Water Planning. San Francisco, CA: Water Utility Climate Alliance White Paper; 2010, 102.
15. Ranger N, Millner A, Dietz S, Fankhauser S, Lopez A. Adaptation in the UK: A Decision-Making Process. Policy brief. London/Leeds: The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics Policy; 2010, 61.
16. Ranger N, Millner A, Dietz S, Fankhauser S, Lopez A. Adaptation in the UK: A Decision-Making Process. Technical Annexes. London/Leeds: The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics Policy; 2010, 69.
17. Waage MD, Kaatz L. Nonstationary water planning: an overview of several promising planning methods. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2011, 47:535–540. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00547.x.
18. Walker WE, Haasnoot M, Kwakkel JH. Adapt or Perish: a review of planning approaches for adaptation under deep uncertainty. Sustainability 2013, 5:955–979. doi:10.3390/su5030955.
19. Watkiss P, Hunt A, Blyth W, Dyszynski J. The use of new economic decision support tools for adaptation assessment: a review of methods and applications, towards guidance on applicability. Clim Change 2015, 132:401–416. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1250-9.
20. Kron W. Flood risk = hazard*values*vulnerability. Water Int 2005, 30:58–68. doi:10.1080/02508060508691837.
21. Penning-Rowsell EC, Priest S, Sally J, Dennis J, Morris J, et al. Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management: A Manual for Economic Appraisal. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis; 2013, 447.
22. Merz B, Elmer F, Thieken AH. Significance of "high probability/low damage" versus "low probability/high damage" flood events. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2009, 9:1033–1046. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-1033-2009.
23. Mens MJP. System robustness analysis in support of flood and drought risk management. Dissertation, University of Twente, 2015, 162**.
24. Hallegatte S. A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the New Orleans Flood Protection System. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Analysis; 2006, 18:2–6.
25. Cutter S, Emrich C, Webb J, Morath D. Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: a review of the literature. Final Report to Oxfam America, 2009, 44.
26. Koks EE, Jongman B, Husby TG, Botzen WJW. Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management. Environ Sci Policy 2015, 47:42–52. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013.
27. Pearce DW, Smale R. Appraising flood control investments in the UK. In: Brouwer R, Pearce D, eds. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Water Resources Management. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited: Cheltenham; 2005, 71–92.
28. Farrow S, Viscusi WK. Towards principles and standards for the benefit-cost analysis of safety. J Benefit-Cost Anal 2011, 2:1–23. doi:10.2202/2152-2812.1035.
29. Zerbe RO Jr, Bellas AS. A Primer for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited; 2006, 316.
30. England K, Knox K. Targeting Flood Investment and Policy to Minimize Flood Disadvantage. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2015, 50.
31. Johnson C, Tunstall S, Priest S, McCarthy S, Penning-Rowsell E. Social justice in the context of flood and coastal erosion risk management: a review of policy and practice. Main Report, R&D Technical Report FD2605TR. London: Defra/Environmental Agency; 2008, 204.
32. Penning-Rowsell E, Pardoe J. The distributional consequences of future flood risk management in England and Wales. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 2014, 33-5:1301–1321. doi:10.1068/c13241.
33. Kahneman D, Deaton A. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. PNAS 2010, 107:16489–16493. doi:10.1073/pnas.1011492107.
34. Kolstad C, Urama K, Broome J, Bruvoll A, Cariño Olvera M, et al. Social, economic and ethical concepts and methods. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, et al., eds. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014, 207–282.
35. Drupp M, Freeman M, Groom B, Nesje F. Discounting disentangled: an expert survey on the determinants of the long-term social discount rate. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 195 and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 172, 2015, 52.
36. Mechler R, Czajkowski J, Kunreuther H, Michel-Kerjan E, Botzen W, et al. Making Communities More Flood Resilient: The Role of Cost Benefit Analysis and Other Decision-Support Tools in Disaster Risk Reduction. Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance; 2014, 76.
37. Nordhaus WD. A review of the stern review on the economics of climate change. J Econ Lit 2007, XLV:686–702.
38. Stern N, Richard T. Ely lecture: the economics of climate change. Am Econ Rev 2008, 98:1–37.
39. Tol RSJ. Climate Economics: Economic Analysis of Climate, Climate Change and Climate Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elger Publishing; 2014, 198.
40. European Union. Guide to Cost Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Brussels: EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate General Regional Policy; 2008, 257.
41. Bombardini M, Trebbi F. Risk aversion and expected utility theory: an experiment with large and small stakes. J Eur Econ Assoc 2012, 10:1348–1399. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01086.x.
42. Harrison G, Rutström E. Expected utility theory and prospect theory: one wedding and a decent funeral. Exp Econ 2009, 12:133–158. doi:10.1007/s10683-008-9203-7.
43. Squire L, van der Tak HG. Economic Analysis of Projects. A World Bank Research Publication. 7th ed. Baltimare, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 1992.
44. Layard R, Mayraz G, Nickell S. The marginal utility of income. CEP Discussion Paper No 784. London: Centre of Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science; 2007: 25.
45. Fankhauser S, Tol R, Pearce DW. The aggregation of climate change damages: a welfare theoretic approach. Environ Resour Econ 1997, 10:249–266.
46. HM Treasury. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. Treasury Guidance. London: TSO; 2011, 114.
47. Asian Development Bank. Cost-Benefit Analysis for Development: A Practical Guide. Mandaluyong: Asian Development Bank; 2013, 377.
48. Horowitz JK, McConnell KE. A review of WTA/WTP studies. J Environ Econ Manage 2002, 44:426–447. doi:10.1006rjeem.2001.1215.
49. Zhai G. Public preference and willingness to pay for flood risk reduction. In: Ikeda S, Fukuzono T, Sato T, eds. A Better Integrated Management of Disaster Risks: Toward Resilient Society to Emerging Disaster Risks in Mega-Cities. Tokyo: TERRAPUB; 2006, 57–87.
50. Botzen WJW, Kunreuther H, Michel- Kerjan E. Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: evidence from floodplain residents in New York City. Judgm Decis Mak 2015, 10:365–385.
51. Kind JM. Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. J Flood Risk Manage 2014, 7:103–117. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12026.
52. Eijgenraam C, Kind J, Bak C, Brekelmans RCM, Hertog D, et al. Economically efficient standards to protect the Netherlands against flooding. Interfaces 2014, 44:7–21. doi:10.1287/inte.2013.0721.
53. Bockarjova M, Rietveld P, Verhoef ET. Composite valuation of immaterial damage in flooding: value of statistical life, value of statistical evacuation and value of statistical injury. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 12-047/3, 2014, 39. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2047062.
54. Arrow KJ, Lind RC. Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. Am Econ Rev 1970, 60:364–378.
55. Sen A. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 1987, 131.
56. Adler MD, Posner EA. New Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2006, 236.
57. Adler MD. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Distributional Weights: An Overview. Durham: Duke Law School, Environmental and Energy Economics Working Paper Series EE13-04; 2013, 49.
58. Dasgupta P, Sen A, Marglin S. Guidelines for Project Evaluation. Project Formulation and Evaluation Series No. 2. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO); 1972, 383.
59. Pearce DW, Nash CA. The Social Appraisal of Projects: A Text in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 1981, 221.
60. Harberger AC. On the use of distributional weights in social cost-benefit analysis. J Polit Econ 1978, 86:87–120.
61. Weisbach DA. Distributionally-weighted cost benefit analysis: welfare economics meet organizational design. Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 478, University of Chicago, 2014, 46.
62. World Bank. Cost-Benefit Analysis in World Bank Projects: Report of the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG). Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2010, 61.
63. Schmidt MGW, Held H, Kriegler E, Lorenz A. Climate policy under uncertain and heterogeneous climate damages. Environ Resour Econ 2013, 54:79–99. doi:0.1007/s10640-012-9582-2.
64. Stanton EA. Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: the mathematics of global inequality. Clim Change 2011, 107:417–432. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9967-6.
65. Somanathan E. Valuing lives equally: distributional weights for welfare analysis. Econ Lett 2006, 90:122–125. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2005.07.015.
66. Brouwer R, Aftab S, Brander L. Socio-economic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: a case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. PREM Working Paper No. 06/01, IVM – VU Universiteit Amsterdam, 2006, 21.
67. Lasage R, Veldkamp T, de Moel E, Van T, Phi H, et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of flood adaptation strategies for HCMC. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2014, 14:1441–1457. doi:10.5194/nhess-14-1441-2014.
68. Winsemius H, Jongman B, Veldkamp T, Hallegatte S, Bangalore M, Ward P. Disaster risk, climate change, and poverty assessing the global exposure of poor people to floods and droughts. Policy Research Working Paper No. 7480. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2015, 33.
69. Varian Hal R. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. New York: Norton Company; 2014, 761.
70. Medin H, Nyborg K, Bateman I. The assumption of equal marginal utility of income: how much does it matter? Ecol Econ 2001, 36:397–411. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00239-1.
71. Harsanyi JC. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J Polit Econ 1955, 63:309–321.
72. Schulze WD, Kneese AV. Risk in benefit-cost analysis. Risk Anal 1981, 1:81–88. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01362.x.
73. Botzen WJW, van den Bergh JCJM. Specifications of social welfare in economic studies of climate policy: overview of criteria and related policy insights. Environ Resour Econ 2014, 58:1–33. doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9738-8.
74. Treasury Board of Canada. Canadian Cost-Benefit Analysis Guide: Regulatory Proposals. Ottowa: Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat; 2007, 47.
75. Romijn G, Renes G. Algemene leidraad voor maatschappelijke kosten-batenanalyse. The Hague: CPB/PBL; 2013, 189.
76. The Treasury, New Zealand Government. Guide to Social Cost Benefit Analysis. Wellington: The Treasury; 2015, 78.
77. Defra. Revisions to economic appraisal on reflecting socio-economic equity in appraisal and appraisal of human related intangible impacts of flooding. Supplementary Note to Operating Authorities, FCDPAG3 Economic Appraisal, Flood and Coastal Defence Project Appraisal Guidance, London, 2004, 10.
78. US Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Regulatory analysis. Circular A-4, 2003, 47.
79. FEMA. BCA Reference Guide. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security; 2009, 108.
80. The State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury). Project Assessment Framework: Cost-Benefit Analysis. Brisbane City: The State of Queensland; 2015, 31.
81. Nef Consulting. Simplified Guidelines for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Climate Change Adaptation Projects on a Local Scale. London: Care and Nef Consulting limited; 2014, 19.
82. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects: Economic Appraisal Tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Brussels: European Commission; 2014, 358.
83. Inter-American Development Bank. Guidelines for the Economic Analysis of IDB-Funded Projects. Washington DC: Office of Strategic Planning and Development Effectiveness, Inter-American Development Bank; 2012, 47.
84. Belli P, Anderson JR, Barnum HN, Dixon JA, Tan JP. Economic Analysis of Investment Operations: Analytical Tools and Practical Applications. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2001, 240.
85. Hallegatte S, Bangalore M, Vogt-Schilb A. Assessing Socioeconomic Resilience to Floods in 90 Countries. Policy Research Working Paper No. 7663. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2016, 27.
86. Kaufman N. Why is risk aversion unaccounted for in environmental policy evaluations? Clim Change 2014, 125:127–135. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1146-8.
87. Boardman A, Greenberg D, Vining AR, Weimer DL. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. New Jersey: Pearson Education Limited; 2014.
88. Elbers C, Fujii T, Lanjouw P, Ozler B, Yin W. Poverty alleviation through geographic targeting. J De Econ 2007, 83:198–213. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.02.001.
89. Broer T. Zelfs de VVD-kiezer wenst nivellering. In: Vrij Nederland. Amsterdam: WPG Media; 2009, 13.
90. Volkskrant. Kloof tussen top en werkvloer groeit in Nederland gestaag. Amsterdam: De Persgroep; 2016.
91. Jongman B, Kreibich H, Apel H, Barredo JI, Bates PD, et al. Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2012, 12:3733–3752. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012.
92. Kroll Y, Davidovitz L. Inequality aversion versus risk aversion. Economica 2013, 70:19–29.