메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 127-135

Why is risk aversion unaccounted for in environmental policy evaluations?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; CLIMATE CHANGE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 84957434073     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: 15731480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-014-1146-8     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (13)

References (17)
  • 1
    • 84883291728 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Epstein-Zin utility in DICE: Is risk aversion irrelevant to climate policy?
    • Ackerman F, Stanton E, Bueno R (2013) Epstein-Zin utility in DICE: Is risk aversion irrelevant to climate policy? Environ Resour Econ 56:73–84
    • (2013) Environ Resour Econ , vol.56 , pp. 73-84
    • Ackerman, F.1    Stanton, E.2    Bueno, R.3
  • 2
    • 67650221268 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Risk aversion, time preference, and the social cost of carbon
    • Anthoff D, Tol RSJ, Yohe G (2009) Risk aversion, time preference, and the social cost of carbon. Environ Res Lett 4(2):1–7
    • (2009) Environ Res Lett , vol.4 , Issue.2 , pp. 1-7
    • Anthoff, D.1    Tol, R.S.J.2    Yohe, G.3
  • 3
    • 0000940164 scopus 로고
    • Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions
    • Arrow K, Lind R (1970) Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. American Economic Review 60(3):364–378
    • (1970) American Economic Review , vol.60 , Issue.3 , pp. 364-378
    • Arrow, K.1    Lind, R.2
  • 6
    • 0039738138 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Demography of risk aversion
    • Halek M, Eisenhauer J (2001) Demography of risk aversion. J Risk Insur 68(1):1–24
    • (2001) J Risk Insur , vol.68 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-24
    • Halek, M.1    Eisenhauer, J.2
  • 7
    • 84957431166 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, 2003, 2011
    • HM Treasury (2011) Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, 2003, 2011. Annex 5. http://greenbook.treasury.gov.uk/
    • (2011) Annex , pp. 5
    • Treasury, H.M.1
  • 8
    • 84957451830 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Carbon (2010) Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis (Under Executive Order 12866).
    • Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Carbon (2010) Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis (Under Executive Order 12866). http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/regulations/scc-tsd.pdf
  • 9
    • 84856229098 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The bias of integrated assessment models that ignore climate catastrophes
    • Kaufman N (2012) The bias of integrated assessment models that ignore climate catastrophes. Clim Chang 110(3):575–595. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0140-7
    • (2012) Clim Chang , vol.110 , Issue.3 , pp. 575-595
    • Kaufman, N.1
  • 10
    • 0036809886 scopus 로고
    • Production, growth and business cycles: technical appendix
    • King R, Plosser C, Rebelo S (1990) Production, growth and business cycles: technical appendix. Comput Econ 20:87–116
    • (1990) Comput Econ , vol.20 , pp. 87-116
    • King, R.1    Plosser, C.2    Rebelo, S.3
  • 11
    • 84865066003 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The US government’s social cost of carbon estimates after their first two years: Pathways for improvement, Economics, No. 2012–15, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 6(2012–15):1–41
    • Kopp RE, Mignone BK (2012) The US government’s social cost of carbon estimates after their first two years: Pathways for improvement, Economics, No. 2012–15, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 6(2012–15):1–41. doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-15, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57823
    • (2012) doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-15
    • Kopp, R.E.1    Mignone, B.K.2
  • 12
    • 28244466878 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Relative risk aversion: What do we know?
    • Meyer DJ, Meyer J (2005) Relative risk aversion: What do we know? J Risk Uncertain 31(3):243–262
    • (2005) J Risk Uncertain , vol.31 , Issue.3 , pp. 243-262
    • Meyer, D.J.1    Meyer, J.2
  • 13
    • 0000530510 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decreasing relative risk aversion and tests of risk sharing
    • Ogaki M (2001) Decreasing relative risk aversion and tests of risk sharing. Econometrica 69(2):515–526
    • (2001) Econometrica , vol.69 , Issue.2 , pp. 515-526
    • Ogaki, M.1
  • 14
    • 84884752674 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Climate change policy: what do the models tell us?
    • Pindyck RS (2013) Climate change policy: what do the models tell us? J Econ Lit 2013 51(3):860–872
    • (2013) J Econ Lit 2013 , vol.51 , Issue.3 , pp. 860-872
    • Pindyck, R.S.1
  • 15
    • 0001006304 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration theorem
    • Rabin M (2000) Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration theorem. Econometrica 68(5):1281–92
    • (2000) Econometrica , vol.68 , Issue.5 , pp. 1281-1292
    • Rabin, M.1
  • 16
    • 79952468938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Circular A-4
    • US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2003). Circular A-4, Regulatory analysis
    • (2003) Regulatory analysis
  • 17
    • 69649097412 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change
    • Weitzman ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev Econ Stat 91(1):1–19
    • (2009) Rev Econ Stat , vol.91 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-19
    • Weitzman, M.L.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.