Quality of Korean cataloging records in shared databases

Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 55-90

  Shin, Hee Sook ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliographic control; Cataloging; Chinese, Japanese and Korean (CJK); Korean cataloging records; Quality control; Shared database

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006478589     PISSN: 01639374     EISSN: 15444554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J104v36n01_05     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Lei Zeng, “An Evaluation of the Quality of Chinese-Language Records in the OCLC OLUC Database and A Study of a Rule-based Data Validation System for Online Chinese Cataloging.” Ph.D Diss., University of Pittsburgh, 1992.
2. Janet Swan Hill, “The Elephant in the Catalog: Cataloging Animals You Can’t See or Touch.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 23, no. 1 (1996): 5-25.
3. Joseph C. Harmon, “The Death of Quality Cataloging: Does It Make a Difference for Library Users?” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22 (July 1996): 306-307.
4. Lydia W. Wasylenko, “Building Quality That Counts into Your Cataloging Operation.” Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 23, no. 1 (Spring 1999): 101-104.
5. Rahmatollah Fattahi, “Super Records: an Approach Towards the Description of Works Appearing in Various Manifestations.” Library Review, 45, no. 4, (1996): 19-29.
6. Sarah E. Thomas, “Quality in Bibliographic Control.” Library Trends, 44 (Winter 1996): 491-505.
7. Peter S. Graham, “Quality in Cataloging: Making Distinctions.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 16 (Sept. 1990): 213-218.
8. Richard Reeb, “A Quantitative Method for Evaluating the Quality of Cataloging.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 5, (Winter 1984): 21-26.
9. Ann D. Chapman, “Up to Standard? A Study of the Quality of Records in a Shared Cataloguing Database.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 26 (Dec. 1994): 201-210.
10. Edward T. O’Neill, “Characteristics of duplicate records in OCLC’s online union catalog.” Library Resource & Technical Services, 37 (Jan. 1993): p. 59-71.
11. James R. Dwyer, “The Catalogers’ ‘Invisible College’ at Work: The Case of the Dirty Database Test." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 14, no. 1 (1991): 75-82.
12. Lisa Romero, “Original Cataloging Errors: A Comparison of Errors Found in Entry-level Cataloging with Errors Found in OCLC and RLIN.” Technical Services Quarterly, 12, no. 2 (1994): 13-27.
13. Robert N. Bland, “Quality Control in a Shared Online Catalog Database: The Lambda Experience.” Technical Services Quarterly, 4 (Winter 1986): 43-58.
14. Sheila S. Intner, “Quality in Bibliographic Databases: An Analysis of Member-contributed Cataloging in OCLC and RLIN.” Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 8 (1989): 1-24.
15. Fung-yin K. Simpson, “Quality Control of Chinese Monographic Records: A Case Study.” Journal of East Asian Libraries, no. 116 (Oct. 1998): 31-40.
16. Karen T. Wei and Sachie Noguchi, “RLIN CJK versus OCLC CJK: the Illinois experience.” Library Resources & Technical Services, 33, no. 2 (1989): 140-151.
17. Barbara G. Preece, “Preliminary LC records for monographs in OCLC.” Information Technology and Libraries, 11 (Mar. 1992): 3-9.