Evaluation of a continuous improvement programme of enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery under neuraxial anaesthesia

Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 395-399

  Deniau, Benjamin ^a   Bouhadjari, Nacima ^a   Faitot, Valentina ^a   Mortazavi, Antoine ^a   Kayem, Gilles ^a   Mandelbrot, Laurent ^a   Keita, Hawa ^a,b  

^a HÔPITAL LOUIS MOURIER   (France)

^b Lariboisière Hospital   (France)

Author keywords

Audit; Caesarean delivery; Enhanced recovery; Multidisciplinary; Neuraxial anaesthesia; Quality process

Indexed keywords

CARBETOCIN; OXYTOCIC AGENT; OXYTOCIN;

ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CATHETER REMOVAL; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; DRINKING; EATING; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEURAXIAL ANAESTHESIA; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REHABILITATION CARE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; URINARY CATHETER; ADULT; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL AUDIT; DEVICE REMOVAL; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NERVE BLOCK; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REHABILITATION;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; CESAREAN SECTION; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MEDICAL AUDIT; NERVE BLOCK; OXYTOCICS; OXYTOCIN; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREGNANCY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; URINARY CATHETERIZATION;

EID: 85006325323     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23525568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. [1] Kehlet, H., Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78 (1997), 606–617.
2. [2] Hoffmann, H., Kettelhack, C., Fast-track surgery – conditions and challenges in postsurgical treatment: a review of elements of translational research in enhanced recovery after surgery. Eur Surg Res 49 (2012), 24–34.
3. [3] Kehlet, H., Dahl, J.B., Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 362 (2003), 1921–1928.
4. [4] Vilain, A., La situation périnatale en France en 2010 – premiers résultats de l'enquête nationale. Études et résultats. DREES 775 (2011), 1–8.
5. [5] Lucas, D.N., Gough, K.L., Enhanced recovery in obstetrics – a new frontier?. Int J Obstet Anesth 22 (2013), 92–95.
6. [6] Vickers, R., Das, B., Enhanced recovery in obstetrics. Int J Obstet Anesth, 22, 2013, 349.
7. [7] Wyniecki, A., Raucoules-Aimé, M., de Montblanc, J., et al. Réhabilitation précoce après césarienne programmée : enquête de pratique auprès des maternités des régions Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur et Île-de-France. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 32 (2013), 149–156.
8. [8] Abell, D., Long, O., Skelton, V., et al. Enhanced recovery in obstetrics. Int J Obstet Anesth 22 (2013), 349–350.
9. [9] Wrench, I.J., Allison, A., Galimberti, A., et al. Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary centre experience. Int J Obstet Anesth 24 (2015), 124–130.
10. [10] Jacques, V., Vial, F., Lerintiu, M., et al. Réhabilitation périopératoire des césariennes programmées non compliquées en France : enquête de pratique nationale. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 32 (2013), 142–148.
11. [11] Benhamou, D., Tecsy, M., Parry, N., et al. Audit of an early feeding program after cesarean delivery: patient well-being is increased. Can J Anaesth 49 (2002), 814–819.
12. [12] Bar, G., Sheiner, E., Lezerovizt, A., et al. Early maternal feeding following caesarean delivery: a prospective randomised study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87 (2008), 68–71.
13. [13] Kramer, R.L., Van Someren, J.K., Qualls, C.R., et al. Postoperative management of cesarean patients: the effect of immediate feeding on the incidence of ileus. Obstet Gynecol 88 (1996), 29–32.
14. [14] Mangesi, L., Hofmeyr, G.J., Early compared with delayed oral fluids and food after caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(3), 2002, CD003516.
15. [15] Jacobsen, A.F., Skjeldestad, F.E., Sandset, P.M., Ante- and postnatal risk factors of venous thrombosis: a hospital-based case-control study. J Thromb Haemost 6 (2008), 905–912.
16. [16] Liu, S., Liston, R.M., Joseph, K.S., et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ 176 (2007), 455–460.
17. [17] Société française d'anesthésie réanimation, Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : les blocs périmédullaires de l'adulte. 2006 http://www.sfar.org/_docs/articles/rpc_perimedullaire.pdf.
18. [18] Angle, P.J., Halpern, S.H., Leighton, B.L., et al. A randomized controlled trial examining the effect of naproxen on analgesia during the second day after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 95 (2002), 741–745.
19. [19] Davis, K.M., Esposito, M.A., Meyer, B.A., Oral analgesia compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 (2006), 967–971.
20. [20] Holt, M., Patient-controlled oramorph – the future?. Anaesthesia 55 (2000), 933–934.
21. [21] Jakobi, P., Weiner, Z., Solt, I., et al. Oral analgesia in the treatment of post-cesarean pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 93 (2000), 61–64.
22. [22] Wilcock, A., Kobayashi, L., Murray, I., Twenty-five years of obstetric patient satisfaction in North America: a review of the literature. J Perinat Neonat Nurs 10 (1997), 36–47.
23. [23] HAS, Brochure d'information. La césarienne : ce que toute femme enceinte devrait savoir. 2013 http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-07/brochure_patient_cesarienne_mel_2013-07-02_11-25-35_632.pdf.