Impact of smoking reduced nicotine content cigarettes on sensitivity to cigarette price: further results from a multi-site clinical trial

Addiction

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 349-359

  Smith, Tracy T ^a   Cassidy, Rachel N ^b   Tidey, Jennifer W ^b   Luo, Xianghua ^c   Le, Chap T ^c   Hatsukami, Dorothy K ^d   Donny, Eric C ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

End game; harm reduction; nicotine; public policy; smoking; taxation

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE;

ADULT; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COMMERCE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; NICOTINE; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85006054964     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/add.13636     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. US Food and Drug Administration, Congress. The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2009.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
3. Donny E. C., Denlinger R. L., Tidey J. W., Koopmeiners J. S., Benowitz N. L., Vandrey R. G. et al. Randomized trial of reduced nicotine standards for cigarettes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1340–1349.
4. Benowitz N. L., Henningfield J. E. Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 123–125.
5. Benowitz N. L., Henningfield J. E. Reducing the nicotine content to make cigarettes less addictive. Tob Control 2013; 22: i14–i17.
6. Eriksen M., Mackay J., Schluger N., Gomeshtapeh F. I., Drope J. The Tobacco Atlas. Atlanta, GA: World Lung Foundation; 2015.
7. Chaloupka F. J., Straif K., Leon M. E., Working Group IAfRoC Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control. Tob Control 2011; 20: 235–238.
8. Hursh S. R., Roma P. G. Behavioral economics and empirical public policy. J Exp Anal Behav 2013; 99: 98–124.
9. Murphy J. G., MacKillop J. Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2006; 14: 219–227.
10. Jacobs E. A., Bickel W. K. Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1999; 7: 412–426.
11. Hursh S. R., Silberberg A. Economic demand and essential value. Psychol Rev 2008; 115: 186–198.
12. Koffarnus M. N., Franck C. T., Stein J. S., Bickel W. K. A modified exponential behavioral economic demand model to better describe consumption data. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2015; 23: 504–512.
13. Hursh S. R., Raslear T. G., Shurtleff D., Bauman R., Simmons L. A cost–benefit analysis of demand for food. J Exp Anal Behav 1988; 50: 419–440.
14. Bickel W. K., Marsch L. A., Carroll M. E. Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000; 153: 44–56.
15. MacKillop J., Murphy J. G., Ray L. A., Eisenberg D. T., Lisman S. A., Lum J. K. et al. Further validation of a cigarette purchase task for assessing the relative reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in college smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2008; 16: 57–65.
16. Geraci M. Linear quantile mixed models: the 1qmm package for laplace quantile regression. J Stat Softw 2014; 57: 1–29.
17. Sensible Tobacco Enforcement Act. New York, NY: New York City Administrative Code; 2013.
18. MacKillop J., Tidey J. W. Cigarette demand and delayed reward discounting in nicotine-dependent individuals with schizophrenia and controls: an initial study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011; 216: 91–99.
19. Chase H. W., Mackillop J., Hogarth L. Isolating behavioural economic indices of demand in relation to nicotine dependence. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013; 226: 371–380.
20. O'Connor R. J., Heckman B. W., Adkison S. E., Rees V. W., Hatsukami D. K., Bickel W. K. et al. Persistence and amplitude of cigarette demand in relation to quit intentions and attempts. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2016; 233: 2365–2371.
21. Murphy J. G., MacKillop J., Tidey J. W., Brazil L. A., Colby S. M. Validity of a demand curve measure of nicotine reinforcement with adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011; 113: 207–214.
22. Mackillop J., Murphy C. M., Martin R. A., Stojek M., Tidey J. W., Colby S. M. et al. Predictive validity of a cigarette purchase task in a randomized controlled trial of contingent vouchers for smoking in individuals with substance use disorders. Nicotine Tob Res 2016; 18: 531–537.
23. Kozlowski L. T. Let actual markets help assess the worth of optional very-low-nicotine cigarettes before deciding on mandatory regulations. Addiction 2016; DOI: 10.1111/add.13515.
24. Laugesen M., Grace R. C. Excise, electronic cigarettes and nicotine reduction to reduce smoking prevalence in New Zealand by 2025. NZ Med J 2015; 128: 72–74.
25. Laugesen M., Grace R. C. Excise, electronic cigarettes and nicotine reduction to reduce smoking prevalence in New Zealand by 2025. NZ Med J 2016; 129: 94–95.
26. Donny E. C., Walker N., Hatsukami D., Bullen C. Reducing the nicotine content of combusted tobacco products sold in New Zealand. Tob Control 2016; DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053186.
27. Benowitz N. L., Donny E. C., Hatsukami D. K. Reduced nicotine content cigarettes, e-cigarettes and the cigarette end game. Addiction 2016; DOI: 10.1111/add.13534.
28. World Health Organization (WHO) Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg). Advisory Note: Global Nicotine Reduction Strategy. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO TobReg; 2015.