Safeguarding maternal and child health in South Africa by starting the child support grant before birth: Design lessons from pregnancy support programmes in 27 countries

South African Medical Journal

Volumn 106, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 1192-1210

  Chersich, M F ^a,b   Luchters, S ^c,d,e   Blaauw, D ^a   Scorgie, F ^b   Kern, E ^a   Van Den Heever, A ^f   Rees, H ^b   Peach, E ^c   Kharadi, S ^g   Fonn, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^c BURNET INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^f University of the Witwatersrand   (South Africa)

^g NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CHILD HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRY; OBSTETRIC DELIVERY; PREGNANCY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOUTH AFRICA; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 85006054152     PISSN: 02569574     EISSN: 20785135     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v106i12.12011     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Statistics South Africa. Poverty trends in South Africa: An examination of absolute poverty between 2006 and 2011. 2014. http://beta2.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-10-06/Report-03-10-06March2014.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
2. Wabiri N, Chersich M, Shisana O, et al. Growing inequities in maternal health in South Africa: A comparison of serial national household surveys. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1048-z
3. Scorgie F, Blaauw D, Dooms T, et al. ‘I get hungry all the time’: Experiences of poverty and pregnancy in an urban healthcare setting in South Africa. Global Health 2015;11:37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0122-z
4. Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: Consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet 2008;371(9609):340-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61692-4
5. Martorell R, Zongrone A. Intergenerational influences on child growth and undernutrition. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012;26(Suppl 1):302-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01298.x
6. Department of Social Development, South African Social Security Agency, UNICEF. The South African Child Support Grant Impact Assessment: Evidence From a Survey of Children, Adolescents and Their Households. Pretoria: UNICEF South Africa, 2012.
7. Gueorguieva R, Morse SB, Roth J. Length of prenatal participation in WIC and risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant: Florida, 1996-2004. Matern Child Health J 2009;13(4):479-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0391-8
8. Murray MF, Hunter BM, Bisht R, et al. Demand-side financing measures to increase maternal health service utilisation and improve health outcomes: A systematic review of evidence from low-and middle-income countries. JBI Libr Syst Rev 2012;10(58):4165-4567. http://dx.doi.org/10.15124/CRD42012002056
9. Aguero J, Carter M, Woolard I. The impact of unconditional cash transfers on nutrition: The South African Child Support Grant. Working Paper 39, Brasilia, International Poverty Centre. 2007. http://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper39.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
10. Fernald LC, Gertler PJ, Neufeld LM. Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth, and development: An analysis of Mexico’s Oportunidades. Lancet 2008;371(9615):828-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60382-7
11. Barber SL. Mexico’s conditional cash transfer programme increases cesarean section rates among the rural poor. Eur J Public Health 2010;20(4):383-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckp184
12. Stecklov G, Winters P, Todd J, et al. Demographic externalities from poverty programs in developing countries: Experimental evidence from Latin America. American University, Washington DC, Department of Economics Working Paper Series. 2006. http://paa2006.princeton.edu/papers/60659 (accessed 1 November 2016).
13. Morris SS, Flores R, Olinto P, et al. Monetary incentives in primary health care and effects on use and coverage of preventive health care interventions in rural Honduras: Cluster randomised trial. Lancet 2004;364(9450):2030-2037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17515-6
14. Jones N, Vargas R, Villar E. Cash transfers to tackle childhood poverty and vulnerability: An analysis of Peru’s Juntos programme. Environ Urban 2008;20(1):255-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956247808089162
15. Moloney A. Difficulties hit Bolivia’s programme for pregnant women. Lancet 2010;375(9730):1955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60910-5
16. Ahmed S, Khan MM. Is demand-side financing equity enhancing? Lessons from a maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 2011;72(10):1704-1710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.031
17. Prado BH, Avila MH. Evaluacion externa de impacto del Programa Oportunidades. 2004. http://lanic.utexas.edu/project/etext/oportunidades/2004/escobar.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
18. Hatt L, Nguyen H, Sloan N, et al. Economic evaluation of demand-side financing (DSF) for maternal health in Bangladesh. Abt Associates, 2010. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Bangladesh%20DSF%20evaluation_FINAL_Feb%202010.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
19. Bhutta ZA, Yakoob MY, Lawn JE, et al. Stillbirths: What difference can we make and at what cost? Lancet 2011;377(9776):1523-1538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62269-6
20. Barber SL, Gertler PJ. The impact of Mexico’s conditional cash transfer programme, Oportunidades, on birthweight. Trop Med Int Health 2008;13(11):1405-1414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02157.x
21. Amarante V, Manacorda M, Miguel E, et al. Do cash transfers improve birth outcomes? Evidence from matched vital statistics, social security and program data. 2011. http://www.nber.org/papers/w17690 (accessed 1 November 2016).
22. Besharov DJ, Germanis P. Evaluating WIC. Eval Rev 2000;24(2):123-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841x0002400201
23. Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, Axelson H, et al. Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000-10): Taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet 2010;375(9730):2032-2044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60678-2
24. Rivera JA, Sotres-Alvarez D, Habicht JP, et al. Impact of the Mexican program for education, health, and nutrition (Progresa) on rates of growth and anemia in infants and young children: A randomized effectiveness study. JAMA 2004;291(21):2563-2570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.21.2563
25. Black MM, Cutts DB, Frank DA, et al. Special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children participation and infants’ growth and health: A multisite surveillance study. Pediatrics 2004;114(1):169-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.114.1.169
26. Lim SS, Dandona L, Hoisington JA, et al. India’s Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: An impact evaluation. Lancet 2010;375(9730):2009-2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60744-1
27. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: Global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 2008;371(9608):243-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61690-0
28. Santos LMP, Paes-Sousa R, Miazagi E, et al. The Brazilian experience with conditional cash transfers: A successful way to reduce inequity and to improve health. Presented at the World Conference on Social Determinants of Health, Brazil, 19-21 October 2011. http://www.who.int/sdhconference/resources/draft_background_paper1_brazil.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
29. Hoddinott J. Early childhood nutrition increases adult wages. Eurochoices 2009;8(2):34-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692x.2009.00130.x
30. Schmidt JO, Ensor T, Hossain A, et al. Vouchers as demand side financing instruments for health care: A review of the Bangladesh maternal voucher scheme. Health Policy 2010;96(2):98-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.008
31. Nguyen HT, Hatt L, Islam M, et al. Encouraging maternal health service utilization: An evaluation of the Bangladesh voucher program. Soc Sci Med 2012;74(7):989-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.030
32. Ahmed S, Khan MM. A maternal health voucher scheme: What have we learned from the demandside financing scheme in Bangladesh? Health Policy Plan 2011;26(1):25-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czq015
33. Ir P, Horemans D, Souk N, et al. Using targeted vouchers and health equity funds to improve access to skilled birth attendants for poor women: A case study in three rural health districts in Cambodia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;10:1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-1
34. Por I, Horeman D, Narin S, van Damme W. Improving access to safe delivery for poor pregnant women: A case study of vouchers plus health equity funds in three health districts in Cambodia. Stud Health Serv Org Policy 2008;24:225-255.
35. Bellows NM, Bellows BW, Warren C. Systematic Review: The use of vouchers for reproductive health services in developing countries. Trop Med Int Health 2011;16(1):84-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02667.x
36. DMMAS study team. Executive summary of DMMAS study. 2010. http://phrsindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/AdvocacyExSummDMMAS.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
37. Mandal DK, Kaur P, Murhekar MV. Low coverage of Janani Suraksha Yojana among mothers in 24-Parganas (South) of West Bengal in 2009. BMC Proc 2012;6(Suppl 1):O3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-6-S1-O3
38. Lahariya C. Cash incentives for institutional delivery: Linking with antenatal and post natal care may ensure ‘continuum of care’ in India. Indian J Community Med 2009;34(1):15-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.45370
39. Bredenkamp C. Results-based financing for Health (RBF): India: The Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) program. World Bank, 2009. https://www.rbfhealth.org/sites/rbf/files/RBF_Country_INDIA_R1.pdf (accessed 3 November 2016).
40. Government of India, Ministry of Women and Child Development. Approval of Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana (IGMSY) – Conditional Maternity Benefit Scheme. 2010. http://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/IGMSYscheme.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
41. Bellows B, Kyobutungi C, Mutua MK, et al. Increase in facility-based deliveries associated with a maternal health voucher programme in informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Health Policy Plan 2013;28(2):134-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czs030
42. Abuya T, Njuki R, Warren CE, et al. A policy analysis of the implementation of a Reproductive Health Vouchers Program in Kenya. BMC Public Health 2012;12:540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-540
43. Obare F, Warren C, Njuki R, et al. Community-level impact of the reproductive health vouchers programme on service utilization in Kenya. Health Policy Plan 2013;28(2):165-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czs033
44. Aneesa A, Gitonga N, O’Hanlon B, et al. Insights from innovations: Lessons from designing and implementing family planning/reproductive health voucher programs in Kenya and Uganda. Private Sector Partnerships-One project, Abt Associates Inc., 2009. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadp185.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
45. Humphreys BR, Sauer R. Special Issue: Sport and public policy. In: Humphreys BR, Sauer R, eds. Contemporary Economic Policy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2007:483-648.
46. Powell-Jackson T, Morrison J, Tiwari S, et al. The experiences of districts in implementing a national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in Nepal. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-97
47. Powell-Jackson T, Dev Neupane B, Tiwari S, et al. Evaluation of the Safe Delivery Incentive Programme: Final report of the evaluation. Support to the Safe Motherhood Programme, Nepal, 2008. http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/www.safemotherhood.org.np/ContentPages/2469459188.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
48. Powell-Jackson T, Hanson K. Financial incentives for maternal health: Impact of a national programme in Nepal. J Health Econ 2012;31(1):271-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.10.010
49. Agha S. Changes in the proportion of facility-based deliveries and related maternal health services among the poor in rural Jhang, Pakistan: Results from a demand-side financing intervention. Int J Equity Health 2011;10:57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-57
50. Agha S. Impact of a maternal health voucher scheme on institutional delivery among low income women in Pakistan. Reprod Health 2011;8:10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-8-10
51. Arur A, Gitonga N, O’Hanlon B, et al. Insights from innovations: Lessons from designing and implementing family planning/reproductive health voucher programs in Kenya and Uganda. Abt Associates Inc., 2009. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadp185.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
52. Kruk ME, Galea S. External Evaluation of Saving Mothers, Giving Life: Final report. 2013. http://savingmothersgivinglife.org/docs/SMGL-Columbia-final-report-Oct-2013.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
53. World Bank. CCT Program Profile – Argentina. 2012. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALPROTECTION/EXTSAFETYNETSANDTRANSFERS/0,contentMDK:20967932~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:282761~isCURL:Y,00.html (accessed 1 November 2016).
54. Molyneux M, Thomson M. Cash transfers, gender equity and women’s empowerment in Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia. Gend Dev 2011;19(2):195-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2011.592631
55. Paes-Sousa R, Santos LM, Miazaki ES. Effects of a conditional cash transfer programme on child nutrition in Brazil. Bull World Health Organ 2011;89(7):496-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.10.084202
56. Fiszbein A, Schady N. Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Policy Research Report, World Bank. 2009. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTCCT/Resources/5757608-1234228266004/PRR-CCT_web_noembargo.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
57. Henderson M. Analisis de los efectos e impactos del programa Comunidades Solidarias Rurales, Periodo 2005-2010. San Salvador, El Salvador, 2011.
58. Soares FV, Britto T. Confronting capacity constraints on conditional cash tansfers in Latin America: The cases of El Salvador and Paraguay. International Poverty Centre, 2007. http://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper38.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
59. De Britto TF. The challenges of El Salvadors’s conditional cash transfer programme, Red Solidaria. International Poverty Centre country study, 2007. http://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCCountryStudy9.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
60. Cecchini S, Madariaga A. Programas de Transferencias Condicionadas: Balance de la Experiencia Reciente en America Latina y El Caribe. Cuadernos del CEPAL 95. 2011. http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/27854-programas-transferencias-condicionadas-balance-la-experiencia-reciente-america (accessed 1 November 2016).
61. Handa S, Davis B. The experience of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean. Development Policy Review, 2006. http://www.fao.org/3/a-ag429t.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
62. Save the Children UK, Yablonski J, O’Donnell M. Lasting benefits: The role of cash transfers in tackling child mortality. 2009. http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/Lasting_Benefits_low_res_comp_revd_1.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
63. Samaniego P, Tejerina L. Financial inclusion through the Bono de Desarrollo Humano in Ecuador. Inter-American Development Bank. Technical Notes 206. 2010. https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/2365/Financial%20Inclusion%20Through%20the%20Bono%20de%20Desarrollo%20Humano%20in%20Ecuador:%20Exploring%20options%20and%20beneficiary%20readiness.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 1 November 2016).
64. MSP. Ministerio de Salud Publica del Ecuador. Proyecto Desnutricion Cero. 2012. http://www.salud.gob.ec/proyecto-desnutricion-cero-completa-cobertura-en-chimborazo/ (accessed 1 November 2016).
65. Gammage S, International Labour Organization. Conditional cash transfers and time poverty: An example from Guatemala. 2011. http://www.cepal.org/mujer/noticias/noticias/1/43711/GAMMAGE_Conditiona_Cash_Transfers_and_Time-Poverty_03102011.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
66. Pan American Health Organization. Social protection in health schemes for mother, newborn and child populations: Lessons learned from the Latin American Region. 2008. http://new.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2010/Social_Protection_Health_Schemes_MNCP.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
67. IFPS Technical Assistance Project. Sambhav: Vouchers make high-quality reproductive health services possible for India’s poor. Gurgaon, Haryana: Futures Group, ITAP, 2012. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnadz573.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
68. Febriany V, Toyamah N, Sodo J, et al. Qualitative impact study for PNPM Generasi and PKH on the provision and the utilization of the Maternal and Child Health Services and Basic Education Services in the provinces of West Java and East Nusa Tenggara. Jakarta, Indonesia. 2011. http://www.smeru.or.id/sites/default/files/publication/pnpmgenerasi_eng.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
69. Levy D, Ohls J. Evaluation of Jamaica’s PATH Conditional Cash Transfer Programme. J Dev Eff 2010;2(4):421-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2010.519783
70. Sosa-Rubi SG, Walker D, Servan E, et al. Learning effect of a conditional cash transfer programme on poor rural women’s selection of delivery care in Mexico. Health Policy Plan 2011;26(6):496-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czq085
71. Barber SL, Gertler PJ. Empowering women to obtain high quality care: Evidence from an evaluation of Mexico’s conditional cash transfer programme. Health Policy Plan 2009;24(1):18-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czn039
72. Barham T. Providing a Healthier Start to Life: The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Neonatal and Infant Mortality. Boulder, Colo.: Department of Economics and Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 2006. www.stanford.edu/group/SITE/archive/SITE_2006/Web%20 Session%202/Barham.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
73. Caldes N, Coady D, Maluccio J. The Cost of Poverty Alleviation Transfer Programmes: A Comparative Analysis of Three Programmes in Latin America. FCND Discussion Paper 174. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2004. http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0708/DOC22752.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
74. Datt G, Payongayong E, Garrett JL, et al. The GAPVU cash transfer program in Mozambique: An assessment. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, 1997. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.58.5525&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
75. World Bank. CCT Program Profile – Nigeria. 2012. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALPROTECTION/EXTSAFETYNETSANDTRANSFERS/0,contentMDK:22063621~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:282761~isCURL:Y,00.html (accessed 1 November 2016).
76. MIDES. Ministerio de Desarrollo Social. Red de Oportunidades. Informe del Equipo Tecnico. 2007. http://www.mides.gob.pa/?page_id=555 (accessed 1 November 2016).
77. Adato M, Roopnaraine T, Becker E. Understanding use of health services in conditional cash transfer programs: Insights from qualitative research in Latin America and Turkey. Soc Sci Med 2011;72(12):1921-1929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.032
78. National Department of Health, South Africa. Saving Mothers 2011-2013: Sixth report on the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in South Africa. 2015. http://www.kznhealth.gov.za/mcwh/Maternal/Saving-Mothers-2011-2013-short-report.pdf (accessed 1 November 2016).
79. Van der Merwe K, Chersich MF, Technau K, et al. Integration of antiretroviral treatment within antenatal care in Gauteng Province, South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006;43(5):577-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.qai.0000243099.72770.d2
80. Presser HB, Salsberg LS. Public assistance and early family formation: Is there a pronatalist effect? Soc Probl 1975;23(2):226-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/799658
81. Moore KA, Caldwell SB. The effect of government policies on out-of-wedlock sex and pregnancy. Fam Plann Perspect 1977;9(4):164-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2134493
82. Makiwane M. The Child Support Grant and teenage childbearing in South Africa. Dev South Afr 2010;27(2):193-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03768351003740498
83. Makiwane M, Udjo E. Is the Child Support Grant Associated With an Increase in Teenage Fertility in South Africa? Evidence from National Surveys and Administrative Data. Pretoria: Child, Youth, Family and Social Development, Human Sciences Research Council, 2006.