A semiotic approach to data quality

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 147 LNBIP, Issue , 2013, Pages 395-410

  Krogstie, John ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

COLLABORATIVE WORK; DATA AND INFORMATION; GENERIC FRAMEWORKS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; MODEL QUALITIES; PRODUCT MODELS; QUALITY OF DATA; SEMIOTIC APPROACHES;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 84879869630     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38484-4_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Batini, C., Scannapieco, M.: Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Springer (2006)
2. Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press (1983)
3. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language: User Guide, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley (2005)
4. Francalanci, C., Pernici, B.: View integration: A survey of current developments. Technical Report 93-053, Politecnico de Milano, Milan, Italy (1993)
5. Kim, J., Pratt, M.J., Iyer, R., Sriram, R.: Data Exchange of Parametric CAD Models Using ISO 10303-108, NISTIR 7433 (2007)
6. Krogstie, J.: Using Quality Function Deployment in Software Requirements Specification. Paper presented at the Fifth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations for Software Quality, REFSQ 1999, Heidelberg, Germany, June 14-15 (1999)
7. Krogstie, J.: A Semiotic Approach to Quality in Requirements Specifications. In: Liu, K., Clarke, R.J., Andersen, P.B., Stamper, R.K., Abou-Zeid, E.-S. (eds.) Organizational Semiotics. IFIP, vol. 94, pp. 231-249. Springer, Boston (2002)
8. Krogstie, J.: Evaluating UML Using a Generic Quality Framework. In: Favre, L. (ed.) UML and the Unified Process, pp. 1-22. IRM Press (2003)
9. Krogstie, J.: Integrated Goal, Data and Process modeling: From TEMPORA to Model-Generated Work-Places. In: Johannesson, P., Søderstrøm, E. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering From Data Analysis to Process Networks, pp. 43-65. IGI (2008)
10. Krogstie, J.: Model-based development and evolution of information systems: A quality approach. Springer, London (2012)
11. Krogstie, J.: Quality of Business Process Models. In: Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 134, pp. 76-90. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
12. Krogstie, J.: Quality of Conceptual Data Models. In: Proceedings 14th ICISO, Stockholm, Sweden (2013)
13. Krogstie, J., Arnesen, S.: Assessing Enterprise Modeling Languages using a Generic Quality Framework. In: Krogstie, J., Siau, K., Halpin, T. (eds.) Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies. Idea Group Publishing (2004)
14. Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modeling of Enterprises. Springer (2008)
15. Manyika, J., Sprague, K., Yee, L.: Using technology to improve workforce collaboration. What Matters. McKinsey Digital (October 2009)
16. Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: What Makes a Good Data Model? Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models. In: Loucopoulos, P. (ed.) ER 1994. LNCS, vol. 881, pp. 94-111. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)
17. Moody, D.L.: Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models. In: Ling, T.-W., Ram, S., Li Lee, M. (eds.) ER 1998. LNCS, vol. 1507, pp. 211-225. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
18. Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.: Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework. Information Systems 28(6), 619-650 (2003)
19. Moody, D.L.: Theorethical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: Current state and future directions. Data and Knowledge Engineering 55, 243-276 (2005)
20. Moody, D.L.: The "Physics" of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35, 756-779 (2009)
21. Morris, C.: Foundations of the Theory of Signs. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, London (1938)
22. Nelson, H.J., Poels, G., Genero, M., Piattini, M.: A conceptual modeling quality framework. Software Quality Journal (2011)
23. Price, R., Shanks, G.: A Semiotic Information Quality Framework. In: IFIP WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Systems (DSS 2004), Prato, Italy, July 1-3, pp. 658-672 (2004)
24. Price, R., Shanks, G.: A semiotic information quality framework: Development and comparative analysis. Journal of Information Technology 20(2), 88-102 (2005)
25. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Krogstie, J.: Ontology- versus pattern-based evaluation of process modeling language: A comparison. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 20, 774-799 (2007)
26. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Univ. of Illinois Press (1963)
27. Shneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human- Computer Interaction, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, Reading (1992)
28. Tsichritzis, D., Klug, A.: The ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS Framework. Information Systems 3, 173-191 (1978)
29. Ware, C.: Information Visualization. Morgan Kaufmann (2000)
30. Aasland, K., Blankenburg, D.: An analysis of the uses and properties of the Obeya. In: Proceedings of the 18th International ICE-Conference, Munich (2012)