Metasynthetic Madness: What Kind of Monster Have We Created?

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 3-12

  Thorne, Sally ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

literature review; metastudy; metasynthesis; qualitative; qualitative synthesis; systematic review

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARDS;

HUMANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 85003967055     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732316679370     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Altman D., (2016). My journey to EQUATOR: There are no degrees of randomness. EQUATOR Network. Retrieved from http://www.equator-network.org/2016/02/16/anniversary-blog-series-1/
2. Armstrong R., Hall B. J., Doyle J., Waters E., (2011). Cochrane update: Scoping the scope of a Cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33, 147-150.
3. Booth A., Noyes J., Flemming K., Gerhardus A., Wahlster P., Van der Wilt,. Rehfuess E., (2016). Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions. Retrieved from http://www.integrate-hta.eu/downloads/
4. Clark A. M., (2016). Why qualitative research needs more and better systematic review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15 (1). Retrieved from http://ijq.sagepub.com/content/15/1/1609406916672741.full
5. Coonan M., (2010). Raising the gaze. New England Journal of Public Policy, 23 (1), Article 16.
6. Dixon-Woods M., Cavers D., Agarwal S., Annandale E., Arthur A., Harvey J.,. Sutton A. J., (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, Article 35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
7. Estabrooks C., Field P., Morse J., (1994). Aggregating qualitative findings: An approach to theory development. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 503-511.
8. Finfgeld-Connett D., (2016). The future of theory-generating meta-synthesis research. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 291-293.
9. Frost J., Garside R., Cooper C., Britten N., (2016). Meta-study as diagnostic: Toward content over form in qualitative synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 307-319.
10. Gough D., (2013). Meta-narrative and realist reviews: Guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal. BMC Medicine, 11, Article 22.
11. Grant M. J., Booth A., (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91-108.
12. Greenhalgh T., (2004). Meta-narrative mapping: A new approach to the systematic review of complex evidence. In Hurwitz B., Greenhalgh T., Skultans V., (Eds.), Narrative research in health and illness (pp. 349-381). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13. Greenhalgh T., Robert G., Macfarlane F., Bate P., Kyriakidou O., Peacock R., (2005). Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 417-430.
14. Gülmezoglu A. M., Chandler J., Shepperd S., Pantoja T., (2013). Reviews of qualitative evidence: A new milestone for Cochrane [Editorial]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, ED000073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000073
15. Jensen L., Allen M., (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 553-560.
16. Kearney M. H., (2001). New directions in grounded formal theory. In Schreiber R., Stern P. N., (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 227-246). New York: Springer.
17. Kokol P., (2016). Metasynthesis: Fairy tale of a nursing sleeping beauty [Research letter]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 59, 38-40.
18. Ludvigsen M. S., Hall E. O. C., Meyer G., Fegran L., Aagaard H., Uhrenfeldt L., (2016). Using Sandelowski and Barroso's meta-synthesis method in advancing qualitative evidence. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 320-329.
19. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G., & the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264-269.
20. Noblit G., Hare R., (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. O'Brien B. C., Harris I. B., Beckman T. J., Reed D. A., Cook D. A., (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89, 1245-1251.
22. Page M. J., Moher D., (2016). Mass production of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: An exercise in meta-silliness. The Millbank Quarterly, 94, 515-519.
23. Paterson B. L., Thorne S., Canam C., Jillings C., (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Paterson. B. L., Thorne S., Dewis M,. (1998). Adapting to and managing diabetes. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30, 57-62.
25. Pawson R., (2007). Digging for nuggets: How "bad" research can yield "good" evidence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 127-142.
26. Popay J., Rogers A., Williams G., (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 341-351.
27. Ritzer G., (1991). Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
28. Sandelowski M., (2006). "Meta-jeopardy": The crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis. Nursing Outlook, 54, 10-16.
29. Sandelowski M., (2008). Reading, writing and systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64, 104-110.
30. Sandelowski M., (2011). When a cigar is not just a cigar: Alternative takes on data and data analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 34, 342-352.
31. Sandelowski M., (2014). A matter of taste: Evaluating the quality of qualitative research. Nursing Inquiry, 22, 86-94.
32. Sandelowski M., Barroso J., (2003). Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nursing Research, 52, 226-233.
33. Sandelowski M., Docherty S., Emden C., (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365-371.
34. Sandelowski M., Voils C. I., Barroso J., Lee E.-J., (2008). "Distorted into clarity": A methodological case study illustrating the paradox of systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 454-465.
35. Schreiber R., Crooks D., Stern P. N., (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In Morse J. M., (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 311-326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Shea B. J., Grimshaw J. M., Wells G. A., Boers M., Andersson N., Hamel C.,. Bouter L. M., (2007). Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, Article 10.
37. Thomas J., Harden A., (2009). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45.
38. Thorne S., (2016). The status and use value of qualitative research findings. In Lipscomb M., (Ed.), Exploring evidence based practice: Debates and challenges in nursing (pp. 151-164). London: Routledge.
39. Thorne S., Jensen L., Kearney M., Noblit G., Sandelowski M., (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1342-1365. doi: 10.1177/1049732304269888
40. Thorne S., Paterson B., Acorn A., Canam C., Joachim G., Jillings G., (2002). Chronic illness experience: Insights from a metastudy. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 437-452.
41. Tong A., Flemming K., McInnes E., Oliver S., Craig J., (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12 (1), Article 181.
42. Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J., (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349-357.
43. Webb C., Roe B., (2008). Reviewing research evidence for nursing practice: Systematic reviews. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
44. Weed M., (2005). "Meta interpretation": A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6 (1), Article 37.
45. Whittemore R., Knafl K., (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, 546-553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
46. Wong G., Greenhalgh T., Westhorp G., Buckingham J., Pawson R., (2013a). RAMESES publication standards: Meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine, 11, Article 20.
47. Wong G., Greenhalgh T., Westhorp G., Buckingham J., Pawson R., (2013b). RAMESES publication standards: Realist syntheses. BMC Medicine, 11, Article 21.
48. Zhao S., (1991). Metatheory, metamethod, meta-data-analysis: What, why and how? Sociological Perspectives, 34, 377-390.