Hybrid input–output table method for socioeconomic and environmental assessment of a wind power generation system

Applied Energy

Volumn 185, Issue , 2017, Pages 1067-1075

  Nagashima, Shin ^a   Uchiyama, Yohji ^a   Okajima, Keiichi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

CO2 emissions; Economic impact; Energy consumption; Input output table; Life cycle assessment; Wind power generation system

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMICS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINES;

ECONOMIC IMPACTS; ELECTRICITY DEMANDS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL BURDENS; INPUT-OUTPUT TABLE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); WIND POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS; WIND TURBINE PRODUCTION;

LIFE CYCLE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MANUFACTURING; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINE;

EID: 85003952218     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. [1] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, 511–597 [Chapter 7].
2. [2] International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2013; 2013. p. 197–29 [Chapter 6].
3. [3] Dai, H., Xie, X., Xie, Y., Liu, J., Masui, T., Green growth: the economic impacts of large-scale renewable energy development in China. Appl Energy 162 (2016), 435–449.
4. [4] Apergis, N., Payne, J.E., The renewable energy consumption–growth nexus in Central America. Appl Energy 88 (2011), 343–347.
5. [5] Liu, W., Lund, H., Mathiesen, B.V., Zhang, X., Potential of renewable energy systems in China. Appl Energy 88 (2011), 518–525.
6. [6] International Energy Agency. Technology roadmap wind energy 2013 edition; 2013.
7. [7] Tremeac, B., Meunier, F., Life cycle analysis of 4.5 MW and 250 W wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13 (2009), 2104–2110.
8. [8] Reimers, B., Ozdirik, B., Kaltschmitt, M., Greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generated by offshore wind farms. Renewable Energy 72 (2014), 428–438.
9. [9] Marimuthu, C., Kirubakaran, V., Carbon pay back period for solar and wind energy project installed in India: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 23 (2013), 80–90.
10. [10] Martínez, E., Jiménez, E., Blanco, J., Sanz, F., LCA sensitivity analysis of a multi-megawatt wind turbine. Appl Energy 87 (2010), 2293–2303.
11. [11] Martínez, E., Sanz, F., Pellegrini, S., Jiménez, E., Blanco, J., Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine. Renewable Energy 34 (2009), 667–673.
12. [12] Crawford, R.H., Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13 (2009), 2653–2660.
13. [13] Alvarez, S., Sosa, M., Rubio, A., Product and corporate carbon footprint using the compound method based on financial accounts. The case of Osorio wind farms. Appl Energy 139 (2015), 196–204.
14. 2 emissions from wind power plants: methodology and case studies. Renewable Energy 43 (2012), 30–36.
15. [15] Verma, A., Kumar, A., Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification. Appl Energy 147 (2015), 556–568.
16. [16] Thakur, A., Canter, C.E., Kumar, A., Life-cycle energy and emission analysis of power generation from forest biomass. Appl Energy 128 (2014), 246–253.
17. [17] Strazza, C., Borghi, A.D., Costamagna, P., Traverso, A., Santin, M., Comparative LCA of methanol-fuelled SOFCs as auxiliary power systems on-board ships. Appl Energy 87 (2010), 1670–1678.
18. [18] López, J. Ma, Gómez, Á., Aparicio, F., Sánchez, F.J., Comparison of GHG emissions from diesel, biodiesel and natural gas refuse trucks of the City of Madrid. Appl Energy 86 (2009), 610–615.
19. p photovoltaic plant and comparison with traditional energy production systems. Appl Energy 97 (2012), 930–943.
20. [20] Ardente, F., Beccali, M., Cellura, M., Brano, V.L., Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an Italian wind farm. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12 (2008), 200–217.
21. [21] Mizumoto, Y., Uchiyama, Y., Okajima, K., Environment, energy, economic analysis of solar PV system installation with hybrid input–output analysis, Master ’s thesis for Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering. 2013, University of Tsukuba.
22. [22] Lenzen, M., Wachsmann, U., Wind turbines in Brazil and Germany: an example of geographical variability in life-cycle assessment. Appl Energy 77 (2004), 119–130.
23. [23] Heijungs, R., Suh, S., The computational structure of life cycle assessment. 2011, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. [24] Suh, S., Material and energy flows in industry and ecosystem networks. 2004, Leiden University Press.
25. [25] Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan, 2005 Input–output table; 2009 [Japanese].
26. [26] Raa, T.T., The economics of input–output analysis. 2006, Cambridge University Press.
27. [27] Leontief, W., Input–output economics. 2nd ed., 1986, Oxford University Press.
28. [28] Hirschman, A.O., The strategy of economic development. 1958, Yale University Press.
29. [29] Chun, D., Woo, C., Seo, H., Chung, Y., Hong, S., Kim, J., The role of hydrogen energy development in the Korean economy: an input–output analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014), 7627–7633.
30. [30] San Cristóbal, J.R., Biezma, M.V., The mining industry in the European Union: analysis of inter-industry linkages using input–output analysis. Resour Policy 31 (2006), 1–6.
31. [31] Sonis, M., Hewings, G.J.D., Economic landscapes: multiplier project matrix analysis for multiregional input–output systems. Hitotsubashi J Econ 40 (1999), 59–74.
32. [32] Duarte, R., Sánchez-Chóliz, J., Bielsa, J., Water use in the Spanish economy: an input–output approach. Ecol Econ 43 (2002), 71–85.
33. [33] Han, S.Y., Yoo, S.H., Kwak, S.J., The role of the four electric power sectors in the Korean national economy: an input–output analysis. Energy Policy 32 (2004), 1531–1543.
34. 2 emissions based on the hypothetical extraction method in South Africa. J Clean Prod 103 (2015), 916–924.
35. [35] Nansai K, Moriguchi Y, Tohno S. Embodied energy and emission intensity data for Japan using input–output table (3EID), Center for Global Environmental Research National Institute for Environmental Studies Independent Administrative Institution; 2010.
36. [36] Rodríguez-Alloza, A.M., Malik, A., Lenzen, M., Gallego, J., Hybrid input–output life cycle assessment of warm mix asphalt mixtures. J Clean Prod 90 (2015), 171–182.
37. [37] Malik, A., Lenzen, M., Ralph, P.J., Tamburic, B., Hybrid life-cycle assessment of algal biofuel production. Bioresour Technol 184 (2015), 436–443.
38. [38] Igos, E., Rugani, B., Rege, S., Benetto, E., Drouet, L., Zachary, D.S., Combination of equilibrium models and hybrid life cycle-input–output analysis to predict the environmental impacts of energy policy scenarios. Appl Energy 145 (2015), 234–245.
39. [39] Jiang, Q., Li, T., Liu, Z., Zhang, H., Ren, K., Life cycle assessment of an engine with input–output based hybrid analysis method. J Clean Prod 78 (2014), 131–138.
40. [40] Jiang, Q., Liu, Z., Li, T., Zhang, H., Iqbal, A., Life cycle assessment of a diesel engine based on an integrated hybrid inventory analysis model. Procedia CIRP 15 (2014), 496–501.
41. [41] Suh, S., Huppes, G., Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. J Clean Prod 13 (2005), 687–697.
42. [42] Vestas Wind Systems A/S, V82-1.65 MW.
43. [43] Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Life cycle assessment of electricity produced from onshore sited wind power plants based on Vestas V82-1.65 MW turbines; 2006.
44. [44] Ishikawa, Y., Nakamura, R., Matsumoto, A., Economic effects of renewable energy in the Tohoku region: analysis of solar power and wind power generation introduced by inter-regional input–output table. 2012, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, IAA, 12 [Japanese].