Changing Times in Cardiovascular Publications: A Commentary

American Journal of Medicine

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 11-13

  Moss, Arthur J ^a   Marcus, Frank I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; E-MAIL; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIST; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; QUALITY CONTROL; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MALE; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATIONS; QUALITY CONTROL; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85003856238     PISSN: 00029343     EISSN: 15557162     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.06.052     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. 1 Garfield, E., Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178 (1972), 471–479.
2. 2 European Association of Science Editors (EASE). Available at: http://www.ease.org.uk/sites/default/files/ease_statement_ifs_final.pdf. 2007. Accessed March 4, 2016.
3. 3 Beall, J., Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489, 2012, 179.
4. 4 Adams C. (5 March 2015). SPARC* Directory of Open Access Journals introduces new standards to help community address quality concerns. Available at: http://sparcopen.org/news/2015/directory-of-open-access-journals-introduces-new-standards-to-help-community-address-quality-concerns/. Accessed April 14, 2015.
5. 5 Caplan, A.L., The problem of publication-pollution denialism. Mayo Clin Proc 90 (2015), 565–566.
6. 6 Moher, D., Moher, E., Stop predatory publishers now: act collaboratively. Ann Intern Med 164 (2016), 616–617.