Stop predatory publishers now: Act collaboratively

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 164, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 616-617

  Moher, David ^a   Moher, Ester ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b Privacy Analytics   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHOR PROCESSING CHARGE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FUNDING; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL NETWORK; STANDARD; ETHICS; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;

HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84982135046     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/M15-3015     Document Type: Short Survey

References (6)

1. Shen C, Björk BC. 'Predatory' open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 2015;13:230. [PMID: 26423063] doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
2. Moher D, Srivastava A. You are invited to submit . . . [Letter]. BMC Med. 2015;13:180. [PMID: 26239633] doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0423-3.
3. Zarin DA, Tse T, Ide NC. Trial registration at Clinical Trials.gov between May and October 2005. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2779-87. [PMID: 16382064].
4. Behavioural Insights Team. Update report 2013-2015. London: Behavioural Insights Team; 2015. Accessed at www.behaviouralinsights.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/BIT-Update-Report-Final-2013-2015.pdf on 11 January 2016.
5. Akhawe D, Felt AP. Alice in warningland: A large-scale field study of browser security warning effectiveness. Presented at the 22nd USENIX Security Symposium, Washington, DC, 15 August 2013. Accessed at www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity13/technical-sessions/presentation/akhawe on 11 January 2016.
6. Larivière V, Haustein S, Mongeon P. The oligopoly of academic publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127502. [PMID: 26061978] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.