Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2014, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Carberry, Angela E ^a   Gordon, Adrienne ^b   Bond, Diana M ^c   Hyett, Jon ^b   Raynes Greenow, Camille H ^a   Jeffery, Heather E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; FETUS; FETUS GROWTH; HUMAN; INFANT; LOW RISK PATIENT; NEWBORN; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SCREENING TEST; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 85003444415     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008549.pub3     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Gardosi J, Francis A. Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999;106(4):309-17.
2. Barker DJ. The developmental origins of adult disease. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 2004;23(6 Suppl):588S-595S.
3. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M, Bar J. Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2007;130:187-92.
4. Bricker L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub3]
5. Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2001;108:830-4.
6. Clayton PE, Cianfarani S, Czernichow P, Johannsson G, Rapaport R, Rogol A. Consensus statement: management of the child born small for gestational age through to adulthood: a consensus statement of the International Societies of Pediatric Endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2007;92(3):804-10.
7. Figueras F, Figueras J, Meler E, Eixarch E, Coll O, Gratacos E, et al. Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2007;92:F277-F280.
8. Gardosi J, Chang, A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992;339:283-7.
9. Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG. Customised fetal growth chart: a systematic review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005;25(5):445-50.
10. Grivell RM, Wong L, Bhatia V. Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007113.pub2]
11. Hepburn M, Rosenberg K. An audit of the detection and management of small-for-gestational age babies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1986;93:212-6.
12. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
13. Japaraj RP, Ho JJ, Valliapan J, Sivasangari S. Symphysial fundal height measurement (SFH) in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008136]
14. Jelks A, Cifuentes R, Ross M. Clinician bias in fundal height measurement. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110(4):892-9.
15. Kean LH, Liu DT. Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996;16(2):77-82.
16. Maulik D. Management of fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006;49(2):320-34.
17. Mongelli M, Figueras F, Francis A, Gardosi J. A customised birthweight centile calculator developed for an Australian population. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007;47(2):128-31.
18. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
19. Stuart JM, Healy TJ, Sutton M, Swingler GR. Symphysis-fundus measurements in screening for small-for-dates infants: a community based study in Gloucestershire. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1989;39:45-8.
20. Wright J, Morse K, Kady S, Francis A. Audit of fundal height measurement plotted on customised growth charts. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2006;16(3):341-5.
21. Carberry AE, Gordon A, Bond DM, Hyett J, Raynes-Greenow CH, Jeffery HE. Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008549.pub2]