Hacking the social life of Big Data

Big Data and Society

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Pybus, Jennifer ^a   Coté, Mark ^b   Blanke, Tobias ^b  

^a member of the Photography and the Archive Research Centre   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Big Data; data making; datafication; hacking; mobiles; youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 85002003298     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20539517     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2053951715616649     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Acquisti A, Grossklags J, (2005) Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security and Privacy 3: 26–33.
2. Baym N (2013) Data not seen: The uses and shortcomings of social media metrics. First Monday. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4873/3752 (accessed 15 June 2015).
3. Blanke T, Greenway G, Pybus J, et al. (2014) Mining mobile youth cultures. IEEE 14–17.
4. Bollier D (2015) The blockchain: A promising new infrastructure for online commons, news and perspectives on the commons. In: David Bollier, 3 April. Available at: http://bollier.org/blog/blockchain-promising-new-infrastructure-online-commons (accessed 15 May 2015).
5. Boris C (2013) Twenty-two percent of mobile apps are only used once. Marketing Pilgrim, 6 September. Available at: http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2013/09/twenty-two-percent-of-mobile-apps-are-only-used-once.html (accessed 28 January 2015).
6. boyd D and Marwick AE (2011) Social privacy in networked publics: Teens' attitudes, practices, and strategies. A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1925128 (accessed 10 November 2015).
7. Coleman G (2011) Anonymous: From the Lulz to collective action. The New Everyday: A Media Commons Project. Available at: http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/tne/pieces/anonymous-lulz-collective-action (accessed 15 June 2015).
8. Coté M, (2014) Data motility: The materiality of big social data. Cultural Studies Review 20(1): 121–149.
9. Couldry N, (2014) Inaugural: A necessary disenchantment: Myth agency and injustice in a digital world. The Sociological Review 62: 880–897.
10. Crawford K, Boyd D, (2012) Six provocations for big data. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 662–679.
11. Egele M, Kruegel C, Kirda E, et al. (2011) PiOS: Detecting privacy leaks in iOS applications. NDSS. Available at: https://www.iseclab.org/papers/egele-ndss11.pdf (accessed 16 June 2015).
12. Enck W, Gilbert P, Chun B-G, et al. (2010) TaintDroid: An information-flow tracking system for realtime privacy monitoring on smartphones. OSDI. Available at: http://static.usenix.org/event/osdi10/tech/full_papers/Enck.pdf (accessed 16 June 2015).
13. Han S, Jung J and Wetherall D (2012) A study of third-party tracking by mobile apps in the wild. Report, University of Washington, US, 1 March. Available at: ftp://ftp.cs.washington.edu/tr/2012/03/UW-CSE-12-03-01.PDF (accessed 15 June 2015).
14. Jenkins H, (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York: NYU Press.
15. Kellner D, Share J, (2005) Toward critical media literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 26(3): 369–386.
16. Kelty CM, (2008) Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software, Durham: Duke University Press.
17. Kennedy H, Moss G, Birchall K, (2014) Balancing the potential and problems of digital methods through action research: Methodological reflections. Information, Communication and Society 18(2): 172–186.
18. Kim N, (2014) Three’s a crowd: Towards contextual integrity in third party data sharing. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 28(1): 325–347.
19. Kitchin R (2014) Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data and Society April–June: 1–12.
20. Kitchin R (2013) Four critiques of open data initiatives. In: LSE: The impact blog, 27 November. Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/11/27/four-critiques-of-open-data-initiatives/ (accessed 5 October 2015).
21. Lenhart A (2015) Teens, social media and technology overview 2015. The Pew Research Centre, 9 April. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/ (accessed 15 June 2015).
22. Livingstone S, (2008) Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society 10(3): 393–411.
23. Livingstone S, Mascheroni G and Murru MF (2014) Social networking among European children: New findings on privacy, identity and connection. Hermès. CNRS Editions.
24. Manovich L, (2011) Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. In: Gold MK, (ed.) Debates in the Digital Humanities, Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press. Available at: http://www.manovich.net/DOCS/Manovich_trending_paper.pdf (accessed 28 January 2015).
25. Marwick A, Boyd D, (2014) Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media and Society 16(7): 1051–1067.
26. Mayer-Schoünberger V, Cukier K, (2013) Big Data. A Revolution that will Transform How we Live, Work, and Think, London: John Murray Publishers.
27. Nielsen (2011) New mobile obsession: U.S. teens triple data usage. Nielsen, 15 December. Available at: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2011/new-mobile-obsession-u-s-teens-triple-data-usage.html (accessed 28 January 2015).
28. O’Dwyer R (2015) The revolution will (not) be decentralised: Blockchains, common transitions. Common Transition, 11 June. Available at: http://commonstransition.org/the-revolution-will-not-be-decentralised-blockchains/ (accessed 15 June 2015).
29. O'Neil C (2013) The rise of big data, big brother. Mathbabe, 2 May. Available at: http://mathbabe.org/2013/05/02/the-rise-of-big-data-big-brother/ (accessed 28 January 2015).
30. Osborn C (2012) Teenagers: Mobile gaming, apps and data greed. Znet, 26 March. Available at: http://www.zdnet.com/article/teenagers-mobile-gaming-apps-and-data-greed-infographic/ (accessed 28 January 15).
31. Perez S (2014) Majority of digital media consumption now takes place in mobile apps. TechCrunch 21 August. Available at: http://techcrunch.com/2014/08/21/majority-of-digital-media-consumption-now-takes-place-in-mobile-apps/ (accessed 15 June 2015).
32. Puschmann C and Burgess J (2013) The politics of Twitter data. SSRN Electronic Journal.
33. Raines-Goldie K (2010) Aliases, creeping and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday, 15(1–4). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2775/2432 (accessed 15 June 15).
34. Reason P and Bradbury H (eds) (2008) The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.
35. Shklovski I, Mainwaring SD, Skúladóttir HH, et al. (2014) Leakiness and creepiness in app space: Perceptions of privacy and mobile app use. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ’14, Toronto, Canada, 26 April--1 May, pp. 2347–2356.
36. Spence E (2013) Smartphones kicks in the UK (with some help from Windows phones). Forbes, 4 April. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2013/04/30/teenage-smartphone-kicks-in-the-uk-with-some-help-from-windows-phone/ (accessed 28 January 2015).
37. Svensson P, (2012) The digital humanities as a humanities project. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11(1–2): 42–60.
38. van Dijck J, (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society 12(2): 197–208.
39. Vis F (2013) A critical reflection of big data: Considering APAs, researchers and tools as data makers. First Monday, 10(2). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4878/3755 (accessed 28 January 2015).
40. Weisenthal J (2014) Why Facebook bought WhatsApp in one chart. Business Insider, 19 February. Available at: http://www.businessinsider.com/whatsapp-growth-2014-2?IR=T (accessed 15 June 2015).