Photocatalytic oxidation of gas-phase Hg0 on the exposed reactive facets of BiOI/BiOIO3 heterostructures

Applied Catalysis B: Environmental

Volumn 204, Issue , 2017, Pages 465-474

  Zhou, Ruixing ^a   Wu, Jiang ^a   Zhang, Jing ^a   Tian, Huan ^a   Liang, Pankun ^a   Zeng, Tao ^b   Lu, Ping ^c   Ren, Jianxing ^a   Huang, Tianfang ^a   Zhou, Xiao ^a   Sheng, Pengfei ^a  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRIC POWER   (China)

^b SHANGHAI RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS   (China)

^c NANJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

BiOI; BiOIO3; Heterostructure; Hg0; Photocatalytic oxidation

Indexed keywords

GASES; IRRADIATION; LIGHT EMITTING DIODES; OXIDATION; PHOTOCATALYSTS;

BIOI; BIOIO3; HYDROTHERMAL METHODS; PHOTOCATALYTIC ACTIVITIES; PHOTOCATALYTIC OXIDATIONS; PHOTOCATALYTIC REACTIONS; REACTIVE FACETS; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES;

HETEROJUNCTIONS;

EID: 85001955826     PISSN: 09263373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. 2 photocatalyst for low-concentration elemental mercury removal under various gas conditions. Appl. Catal. B 160–161 (2014), 558–565.
2. [2] Presto, A.A., Granite, E.J., Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006), 5601–5609.
3. [3] Emission standard of air pollutants for power plants, GB 13223-2011.
4. [4] Romero, C.E., Li, Y., Bilirgen, H., Sarunac, N., Levy, E., Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers. Fuel 85 (2006), 204–212.
5. [5] Li, Y., Murphy, P.D., Wu, C.Y., Powers, K.W., Bonzongo, J.C.J., Development of silica/vanadia/titania catalysts for removal of elemental mercury from coalcombustion flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008), 5304–5309.
6. [6] Lu, Dennis Y., Granatstein, David L., Rose, Donald J., Study of mercury speciation from simulated coal gasification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43 (2004), 5400–5404.
7. [7] Granite, E.J., Pennline, H.W., Photochemical removal of mercury from flue gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41, 2002, 5470.
8. [8] Jeon, S.H., Eom, Y., Lee, T.G., Photocatalytic oxidation of gas-phase elemental mercury by nanotitanosilicate fibers. Chemosphere 71 (2008), 969–974.
9. [9] Hoffmann, M.R., Martin, S.T., Choi, W., Bahnemann, D.W., Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 95 (1995), 69–96.
10. 2 superstructures with dominant {001} Facets. Chin. J. Catal. 32 (2011), 525–531.
11. [11] Wang, X.C., Blechert, S., Antonietti, M., Polymeric graphitic carbon nitride for heterogeneous photocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2 (2012), 1596–1606.
12. [12] Cao, S.W., Yu, J.G., G-C3N4-based photocatalysts for hydrogen generation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 (2014), 2101–2107.
13. 17 microspheres with high solar absorption and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chem. Commun. 50 (2014), 9554–9556.
14. [14] Wang, Y., Wang, X., Antonietti, M., Polymeric graphitic carbon nitride as a heterogeneous organocatalyst: from photochemistry to multipurpose catalysis to sustainable chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012), 68–89.
15. [15] Granite, E.J., Freeman, M.C., Hargis, R.A., O'Dowd, W.J., Pennline, H.W., The thief process for mercury removal from flue gas. J. Environ. Manag. 84 (2007), 628–634.
16. 6 flake-like nanophotocatalyst by molten salt method and evaluation for photocatalytic decomposition of rhodamine B. Mater. Chem. Phys. 110 (2008), 197–200.
17. 2 hollow microspheres with mesoporous surface: superior adsorption performance for dye removal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 305 (2014), 352–358.
18. 2 core-shell microspheres with improved photocatalytic performance. Ceram. Int. 41 (2015), 247–252.
19. 2 catalyst properties in NH3-SCR process. Catal. Commun. 59 (2015), 78–82.
20. 2 catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 219 (2013), 319–326.
21. 3 microspheres for efficient visible light photocatalysis. ACS Catal. 4 (2014), 4341–4350.
22. 3 nanoplates. Chem. Eur. J. 19 (2013), 14777–14780.
23. 3 nanosheets with remarkable photocatalytic oxidation removal for gaseous elemental mercury. Chem. Eng. J. 285 (2016), 11–19.
24. 0 under visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 304 (2016), 533–543.
25. [25] Brunauer, S., Emmett, P.H., Teller, E., Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J. Chem. Soc. 60 (1938), 309–319.
26. 2. Appl. Catal. B 176 (2015), 559–569.
27. 3 heterostructure: semiconductor p-n junction and dominantly exposed reactive facets. Cryst. Growth. Des. 16 (2016), 221–228.
28. [28] Cheng, H., Huang, B., Dai, Y., Qin, X., Zhang, X., One-step synthesis of the nanostructured AgI/BiOI composites with highly enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performances. Langmuir 26 (2010), 6618–6624.
29. [29] Xu, Y., Schoonen, M.A., The absolute energy positions of conduction and valence bands of selected semiconducting minerals. Am. Mineral. 85 (2000), 543–556.
30. 4 composite under visible light irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 110:41 (2006), 20211–20216.
31. 2 with PANI. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42:10 (2008), 3803–3807.
32. [32] Dong, F., Xiong, T., Sun, Y.J., Zhang, Y.X., Zhou, Y., Controlling interfacial contact and exposed facets for enhancing photocatalysis via 2D-2D heterostructure. Chem. Commun., 10, 2010, 1039.
33. 3 nanoplates. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41 (2016), 10170–10177.
34. 2 nanotube arrays for photocatalytic degradation: a surface photovoltage study. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 465 (2016), 96–102.
35. 2 heterojunction photocatalysts. Appl. Catal. B 199 (2016), 224–229.
36. [36] Guo, M.Y., Ng, Alan Man Ching, Liu, F.Z., et al. Photocatalytic activity of metal oxides—the role of holes and OH radicals. Appl. Catal. B 107 (2011), 150–157.
37. 2 nanofibers for elemental mercury removal from flue gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 227–228 (2012), 427–435.
38. 3 as an environmental photocatalyst that generates OH radicals under visible light. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010), 6849–6854.
39. 2-aluminum silicate fiber by photocatalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 192 (2012), 21–28.