Fabrication of BiOIO3 nanosheets with remarkable photocatalytic oxidation removal for gaseous elemental mercury

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 285, Issue , 2016, Pages 11-19

  Qi, Xue Mei ^a,b   Gu, Miao Li ^b   Zhu, Xin Yuan ^a   Wu, Jiang ^b   Long, Hui Min ^b   He, Kai ^b   Wu, Qiang ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRIC POWER   (China)

Author keywords

BiOIO3; Electron hole separation; Flue gas; Heterolayered structure; Hg0 photocatalytic oxidation

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; FLUE GASES; IRRADIATION; MERCURY (METAL); NANOSHEETS; OXIDATION; PH; PHOTOCATALYSIS; PHOTOCATALYSTS;

BIOIO3; ELECTRON-HOLE SEPARATION; GASEOUS ELEMENTAL MERCURY; HYDROTHERMAL METHODS; MORPHOLOGY AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURES; PHOTOCATALYTIC ACTIVITIES; PHOTOCATALYTIC OXIDATIONS; PHOTOGENERATED HOLES;

LIGHT EMITTING DIODES;

EID: 84943653229     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.055     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. U.S. EPA, Mercury study report to congress, EPA-452/R-97-003, 1997.
2. Zheng Y.J., Jensen A.D., Windelin C., Jensen F. Review of technologies for mercury removal from flue gas from cement production processes. Prog. Energy Combust. 2012, 38:599-629.
3. Sun M.Y., Hou J.A., Cheng G.H., Baig S.A., Tan L.S., Xu X.H. The relationship between speciation and release ability of mercury in flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum. Fuel 2014, 125:66-72.
4. US EPA, Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for Power Plants, Final Rule, (effective on 19.04.12). http://www.epa.gov/airquality/powerplanttoxics/actions.html.
5. You C.F., Xu X.C. Coal combustion and its pollution control in China. Energy 2010, 35:4467-4472.
6. Tian H.Z., Wang Y., Xue Z.G., Qu Y.P., Chai F.H., Hao J.M. Atmosphere emissions estimation of Hg, As, and Se from coal-fired power plants in China, 2007. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409:3078-3081.
7. State Environmental Protection Administration of China (SEPA) Emission Standard of Air Pollution for Thermal Power Plants, GB 13223-2011 2011, SEPA, Beijing.
8. Gale T.K., Lani B.W., Offen G.R. Mechanisms governing the fate of mercury in coal fired power systems. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89:139-151.
9. Wang Y.J., Duan Y.F., Yang L.G., Zhao C.S., Shen X.L., Zhang M.Y., Zhuo Y.Q., Chen C.H. Experimental study on mercury transformation and removal in coal-fired boiler flue gases. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90:643-651.
10. 2 photocatalytic system for removing gas-phase elemental mercury at Hg-emitting facilities. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 19:144-149.
11. 0 re-emission control from wet fuel gas desulfurization liquors with additives. Fuel 2010, 89:3613-3617.
12. Scala F. Modeling mercury capture in coal-fired power plant flue gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43:2575-2589.
13. Chi Y., Yan N.Q., Qu Z., Qiao S.H., Jia J.P. The performance of iodine on the removal of elemental mercury from the simulated coal-fired flue gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166:776-781.
14. 5 catalysts in simulated low-rank coal combustion flue gas. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 169:186-193.
15. 2 catalysts prepared by sol-gel method. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12:1291-1294.
16. Scala F., Chirone R., Lancia A. Elemental mercury vapor capture by powdered activation carbon in a fluidized bed reactor. Fuel 2010, 90:2077-2082.
17. Lee S.H., Rhim Y.J., Cho S.P. Carbon-based novel sorbent for removing gas phase mercury. Fuel 2006, 85:219-226.
18. Wang H.Q., Zhou S.Y., Xiao L., Wang Y.J., Liu Y., Wu Z.B. Titania nanotubes - a unique photocatalyst and adsorbent for elemental mercury removal. Catal. Today 2011, 175:202-208.
19. 2 photocatalyst for low-concentration elemental mercury removal under various gas conditions. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 160-161:558-565.
20. Presto A., Granite E. Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:5601-5609.
21. 2-aluminum silicate fiber by photocatalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 192:21-28.
22. 2 nanocomposites. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89:567-573.
23. 2/Ar/He thermal plasma for low-concentration elemental mercury removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 191:378-385.
24. 60 derivative and enhanced photocatalytic activity for the reduction of aqueous Cr (VI) ions. Catal. Commun. 2010, 11:741-744.
25. 2 nanofibers for elemental mercury removal from flue gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 227-228:427-435.
26. 2 visible-light photocatalyst for low-concentration mercury removal. Int. J. Photoenergy 2012, 1-8.
27. 6 and effect of morphology and variation in local structure on photocatalytic activities. Appl. Catal. B 2010, 98:138-146.
28. 6 nanocrystals with high photocatalytic activities under visible light. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112:10407-10411.
29. Zhang X., Ai Z.H., Jia F.L., Zhang L.Z. Generalized one-pot synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of hierarchical BiOX (X=Cl, Br, I) nanoplate microspheres. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112:47-753.
30. 4 photocatalysts: pH optimization vs. self-organization. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 135:457-466.
31. 3 nanoplates. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19:14777-14780.
32. 3/RGO nanocomposites under visible and UV irradiation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 447:16-24.
33. Dong F., Xiong T., Sun Y.J., Zhang Y.X., Zhou Y. Controlling interfacial contact and exposed facets for enhancing photocatalysis via 2D-2D heterostructures. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51:8249-8252.
34. Shen L.M., Bao N.Z., Kazumichi Y. Controlled synthesis and assembly of nanostructured ZnO architectures by a solvothermal soft chemistry process. Cryst. Growth Des. 2007, 12:2742-2748.
35. 4: structural and morphological influence on the photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 117-118:59-66.
36. 4 powders prepared via the microwave hydrothermal method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5:5186-5193.
37. 4. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16:2163-2169.
38. 2 loading on woven glass fabric. Chemosphere 2007, 66:185-190.
39. 2+ layer and a large SHG response. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133:12422-12425.
40. 3 heterostructures with enhanced photocatalytic properties. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 442:97-102.
41. 2 nanoparticles with surfactants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2007, 187:363-369.
42. 4 via ZnO modification and the mechanism study. J. Mol. Catal. A 2013, 368-369:9-15.
43. Sin J.C., Lam S.M., Lee K.T., Mohamed A.R. Photocatalytic performance of novel samarium-doped spherical-like ZnO hierarchical nanostructures under visible light irradiation for 2,4-dichlorophenol degradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 401:40-49.