Managing Socio-Technical Integration in Iterative Information System Development Projects

International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI)

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1-16

  Bygstad, Bendik ^a  

^a Norwegian School of Information Technology   (Norway)

Author keywords

information systems development; integration; longitudinal case study; sociotechnical

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001874198     PISSN: 15483908     EISSN: 15483916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jthi.2006100101     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Avison, D., & Fitzgerald, G. (2003). Information systems development: Methodologies, techniques and tools. London: McGraw-Hill.
2. Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. Boston: Ad-dison-Wesley.
3. Blomberg, J. (2001). Using the RUP for enterprise e-business transformation. The Rational Edge. Retrieved January, 2005, from www-106.ibm.com/devel-operworks/rational/library/content/Ra-tionalEdge/jan01/UsingtheRUPforEnter-priseebusinessTransformationJan01.pdf
4. Boehm, B. W. (1988).A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21(5), 61–72.
5. Boehm, B. W. (2003). Value-based software engineering. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engimeering Notes, 28(2), 1–12.
6. Ciborra, C. (1997). De profundis? Deconstructing the concept of strategic alignment. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 9(1), 67–82.
7. Ciborra, C. (2000). From control to drift. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Coakes, E., & Elliman, T (1999). Focus issue on legacy information systems and business process engineering: The role of stakeholders in managing change. Communications of the AIS, 2(4).
9. Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation. Boston: Ernst & Young.
10. Garrety, K., Robertson, P. L. & Badham, R. (2004). Integrating communities of practice in technology development projects. International Journal of ProjectManage-ment, 22(5), 351–358.
11. Garrity, E. J. & Sanders, G. L. (1998). Information systems success measurement. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
12. Giaglis, G. (1999). On the integrated design and evaluation of business process and information systems. Communications of the AIS, 2(1), 1–33.
13. Giddens, A. (1987). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Hanseth, O. (2002). From systems and tools to networks and infrastructures. Toward a theory of ICT solutions and its design methodology implications. Retrieved January, 2005, from http://heim.ifi.uio. no/~oleha/Publications/ib_ISR_3rd_re-subm2.html
15. Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2004). Theorizing about the design of information infrastructures: Design kernel theories and principles. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations, 4(Fall 2004), Article 1.
16. Hanseth, O., & Monteiro, E. (1996). Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information Systems, 7(4), 183–211.
17. Henderson-Sellers, B., & Unhelkar, B. (2000). Open modelling with UML. Harlow: Ad-dison-Wesley Longman.
18. Heugens, P., van den Bosch, F. & van Riel, C. B. M. (2002). Stakeholder integration: Building mutually enforcing relationships. Business & Society, 41(1), 36–60.
19. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, R. (1999). The unified software development process (1st ed.). Reading: Addison Wesley.
20. Kling, R. & Scacchi. (1982). The Web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Advances in Computers, 21, 1–90.
21. Kruchten, P. (2000). The rational unified process. Reading: Addison Wesley Longman.
22. Kruchten, P. (2003). Using RUP to evolve a legacy system. Retrieved January, 2005, from www-106.ibm.com/developer-works/rational/library/389.html
23. Larman, C., & Basili, V. R. (2003). Iterative and incremental development: Abrief history. IEEE Computer, 36(6), 47–56.
24. Laudon, C. K. & Laudon, J. P. (2004). Management information systems. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
25. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26. Mumford, E. (1985). Sociotechnical systems design. Manchester: Manchester Business School.
27. Ngwenyama, O. (1998). Groupware, social action and emergent organizations: On the process dynamics of computer mediated distributed work. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 8(2–3), 127–146.
28. Orlikowski, W. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92.
29. Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). Contextual research and the study of organizational change processes. In E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, & A.T. Wood-Harper (Eds.), Research methods in information systems (pp. 53–78). North-Holland, Amsterdam.
30. Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change theory and practice. Organization Science, 3, 267–292.
31. Rational. (2006a). Rup online. Retrieved June 30, 2006 from, www-306.ibm.com/soft-ware/awdtools/rup/
32. Rational. (2006b). Case studies. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://programs.rational. com/success/
33. Smolander, K. (2003). The birth of an e-business system architecture: Conflicts, compromises, and gaps in methods. Paper presented at the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI.
34. Stapleton, J. (2003). D SDM: Businessfocused development. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.
35. Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects. In A.S. Leem J. Liegnenau, & J.I. DeGross (Eds.), Infomation systems and qualitative research (pp. 466–480). London: Chapman & Hall.
36. Webster's. (1986). Webster's third new international dictionary. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.