Deception: The Dark Side of E-Collaboration

International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC)

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 24-37

  George, Joey F ^a   Marett, Kent ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

collaborative technologies; computer mediated communication; deception

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001759324     PISSN: 15483673     EISSN: 15483681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jec.2005100102     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alge, B., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(1), 26–37.
2. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.). (2000). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
3. Aune, R.K., Metts, S., & Ebesu Hubbard, A. (1998). Managing the outcomes of discovered deception. Journal of Social Psychology, 138(6), 677–689.
4. Baltes, B., Dickson, M., Sherman, M., Bauer, C., & LaGanke, J. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A metaanalysis. Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Processes, 87(1), 156–179.
5. Biros, D., George, J., & Zmud, R. (2002). Inducing sensitivity to deception in order to improve decision making performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 119–144.
6. Buller, D. & Burgoon, J. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203–242.
7. Buller, D., Strzyzewski, K., & Comstock, J. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58, 1–24.
8. Burgoon, J., Buller, D., Ebesu, A., & Rockwell, P. (1994). Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detection. Communication Monographs, 61, 303–325.
9. Connolly, T., Jessup, L., & Valacich, J. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36(6), 689–703.
10. Cooper, R. & Kahai, S. (2003). Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 263–299.
11. Daft, R. & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, Media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–570.
12. Dennis, A., Wixom, B., & Vandenberg, R. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly 25(2), 167–193.
13. DePaulo, B. & Kashy, D. (1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74(1), 63–79.
14. DePaulo, B. & Kirkendol, S. (1989). The motivation impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. Yuille (Ed.), Credibilityassessment (pp. 51–70). Duerne, Belgium: Klewer.
15. DePaulo, B., Lindsay, J., Malone, B., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118.
16. DeSanctis, G. & Gallupe, R. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589–609.
17. Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage (Vol. 2). New York: WW Norton and Company.
18. Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face. Journal ofPersonality& Social Psychology, 20, 288–298.
19. Fjermestad, J. & Hiltz, S.R. (2001). Group support systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 115–159.
20. George, J. & Marett, K. (2004). Inhibiting deception and its detection. Paper presented at the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
21. George, J., Marett, K., & Tilley, P. (2004). Deception detection in resumes in computer-mediated interviews (Unpublished manuscript). FL: Florida State University.
22. Grover, S. (1993). Why professionals lie: The impact of professional role conflict on reporting accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 251–272.
23. Hiltz, S. R. & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Kling, R. (1991). Cooperation, coordination, and control in computer-supported work. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 83–88.
25. Landry, K. & Brigham, J. (1992). The effect of training in criteria-based content analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Lawand Human Behavior, 16(6), 663–676.
26. Maier, N. & Thurber, J. (1968). Accuracy of judgments of deception when an interview is watched, heard, and read. Personnel Psychology, 21, 23–30.
27. Marett, K. & George, J. (2004). Deception in the case of one sender and multiple receivers. Group Decision & Negotiation, 13, 29–44.
28. Marett, K. & George, J. (2005). Group deception in computer-supported environments. Paper presented at the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
29. McCornack, S. & Parks, M. (1986). Deception detection and relationship development: The other side of trust. In McLaughlin (Ed.), Communications Yearbook 9. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
30. McGrath, J. & Hollingshead, A. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
31. McShulkis, E. (1997). Job hunters resorting to questionable ethics. HRMagazine, 42, 27.
32. Miller, G. & Stiff, J. (1993). Deceptive communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
33. Nunamaker, J., Dennis, A., Valacich, J., Vogel, D., & George, J. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 40–61.
34. O'Hair, D., & Cody, M. (1994). Deception. In W.R. Cupach, & B.H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 181–213). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Putnam, L. & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualiztion of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248–265.
36. Rao, S. & Lim, J. (2000). The impact of involuntary cues on media effects. Paper presented at the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
37. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley.
38. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157–187.
39. Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D., Kahn, K., Lanning, S., & Suchman, L. (1987). Beyond the chalkboard: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings. Communications of the ACM, 30(1), 32–47.
40. Stiff, J., Kim, H., & Ramesh, C. (1992). Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, 19(3), 326–345.
41. Takala, T. & Urpilainen, J. (1999). Managerial work and lying: A conceptual framework and an explorative case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), 181–195.
42. Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(4), 239–263.
43. Zuckerman, M. & Driver, R. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A.W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal communication: An integrated perspective (pp. 129–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.