Electronic Medical Records: TAM, UTAUT, and Culture

International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI)

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 55-68

  Trimmer, Ken ^a   Cellucci, Leigh W ^b   Wiggins, Carla ^c   Woodhouse, William ^a  

^a IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b School of Business   (United States)

^c ITHACA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic Medical Records System; Unified Theroy of Acceptance; Use of Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001740596     PISSN: 15553396     EISSN: 1555340X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jhisi.2009070104     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254.
2. Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 660–686.
3. Benbaset, I., & Barki, H. (2007). “Quo Vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(4), 211–218.
4. Burke, D. E., & Menachemi, N. (2004). Opening the black box: Measuring hospitial information technology. Healthcare Management Review, 29(3), 207–217.
5. Burrell, G. (1999). Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, (pp. 642–658). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
6. Daar, A., Harrison, M. I., Shakked, L., & Shalom, N. (2003). Physicians' and nurses' reactions to electronic medical records: Managerial and occupational implications. Journal of Healthcare Organisations, 17(5), 349–359.
7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two Pierce, M. E. (2005). Convergence of the health industry. Leadership in Health Services, 18(1), 22–31.
9. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 35(8)982–1003.
10. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (2004, July). The decade of information technology: Delivering consumer-centric and information rich health care. Washington DC: HHS.
11. Flower, J. (2006). Imagining the future of healthcare. The Physician Executive, 32(1), 64–66.
12. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2003, October). Information technology: Benefits realized for selective health care functions (Tech. Rep. No. GAO-04–224). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2005, February). 21st century challenges: Reexamining the base of the federal Thielst, C. B. (2007). The new frontier of electronic, personal and virtual health records. Journal of Healthcare Management, 52(2), 75–78.
14. Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., & Sheng, O. R. L. (2002). Adoption of telemedicine technology by health care organizations: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 12(3), 197–221.
15. Illie, V., Courtney, J. F., & Van Slyke, C. (2007). Paper versus electronic: Challenges associated with physicians' usage of electronic medical records. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). Big Island, HI.
16. Kerr, E. A., McGlynn, E., Adams, J., Keesey, J., & Asch, S. M. (2004). Profiling the quality of care in communities: Results from the community quality index study. Health Affairs, 23(3), 247–256.
17. Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93.
18. Kohli, R., & Kettinger, W. J. (2004). Informating the clan: Controlling physicians' costs and outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 28(3), 363–394.
19. Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S. (2005). A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 461–491.
20. Lucas Jr., H. C., Swanson, E. B., & Zmud, R. E. (2007). Implementation, innovation and related themes over the years in information systems research. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(4), 206–210.
21. McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro A. et al. (2003). The quality of health care delivered to adults at the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(26), 2635–2645.
22. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. A. (1994). An expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Pierce, M. E. (2005). Convergence of the health industry. Leadership in Health Services, 18(1), 22–31.
24. Snyder, K.D., Paulson, P., & McGrath, P. (2005). Improving processes in a small health care network: A value mapping case study. Business Process Management Journal, 11(1), 87–99
25. Stake, R. E. (1994). Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
26. Straub Jr., D. W., & Burton-Jones, A. (2007). Veni, Vidi, Vici: Breaking the TAM logjam. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(4), 223–229.
27. Thielst, C. B. (2007). The future of healthcare technology. Journal of Healthcare Management, 52(1), 7–9.
28. Thielst, C. B. (2007). The new frontier of electronic, personal and virtual health records. Journal of Healthcare Management, 52(2), 75–78.
29. Treister, N. W. (1998). Physician acceptance of new medical information systems: The field of dreams. The Physician Executive, 24(3), 20–25.
30. Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of ideographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 551–561.
31. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., & Morris, M. G. (2007). Dead or alive? The development, trajectory and future of technology adaptation research. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(4), 267–286.
32. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
33. Wikipedia.org. June 14, 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_residency
34. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Higgins, J. M., & McAllaster, C. (2003). If you want strategic change, don't forget to change your cultural artifacts. Journal of Change Management, 4(1), 63–73.
36. McConnell, C. R. (2006). Umiker's Management Skills for the New Health Care Supervisor, Fourth Edition. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
37. Menachemi, N., Saunders, C., Chukmaitov, A, Matthews, M., & Brooks, R. (2007). Hospital adoption of information technologies and improved patient safety: a study of 98 hospitals in Florida. Journal of Healthcare Management, 52(6), 398–410.
38. Possner, B. Z., Kouzes, J. M., & Schmidt, W. H. (1985). Shared values make a difference: an empirical test of corporate culture. Human Resource Management, 24(3), 293–309.
39. Swayne, L. E., Duncan, W. J., & Ginter, P. M. (2006). Strategic Management of Health Care Organizations, Fifth Edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
40. Thielst, C. B., & Gardner, J. H. (2008). Clinical documentation systems: another link between technology and quality. Journal of Healthcare Management, 53(1), 5–7.
41. Wenzel, F. J. (2005). Governance Organizational Models and Issues. In F. J. Wenzel & J. M. Wenzel (Eds.), Fundamentals of Physician Practice Management. (pp. 43–58). Chicago: Health Administration Press
42. Wiggins, C., Hatzenbuehler, L. C., & Peterson, T. (2008). Hospital Missions and the Education of our Future Health Care Workforce. The Journal of Allied Health, 37(3), 132–136.
43. Wikipedia.org. November 14, 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_acceptance_ model