User Acceptance of Internet Banking In Malaysia: Test of Three Competing Models

International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA)

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-19

  Rouibah, Kamel ^a   Thurasamy, Ramayah ^b   May, Oh Sook ^b  

^a College of Business and Administration ^*  (Kuwait)

^b SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001720279     PISSN: 19379633     EISSN: 19379641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jea.2009010101     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ajzen I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.
2. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
4. Celuch K., Taylor, S. A., & Goodwin, S. (2004). Understanding Insurance Salesperson Internet Information Management Intentions: A Test of Competing Models. Journal of Insurance Issues, 27(1), 22–40.
5. Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2001). Information Technology Acceptance by Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699–719.
6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 983–1003.
7. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 35, 982–1003.
8. Grandon, E. E., (2005). Extension and validation of the theory of planned behavior: The case of electronic commerce adoption in small and medium-sized businesses in Chile, Ph.D., Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2005, 213 pages.
9. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Lassar, W. M., Manolis, C., & Lassar S. S. (2005). The relationship between consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and online banking adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(2), 176–199.
11. Lee, B. L. (2005). Factors Influencing e-mail usage: Applying the UTAUT Model. Unpublished MBA dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.
12. Legris P., Ingham J., & Collerette P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40, 191–204.
13. Liao, S. Shao, Y. P. Wang, H., & Chen, A. (1999). The adoption of virtual banking: an empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 19(1), 63–74.
14. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intention: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory planned behavior. Information systems research, 2(3), 173–1991.
15. Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14(3), 224–235.
16. Ramayah, T., Md. Taib, F., & Koay, P. L. (2006). Classifying Users and Non-Users of Internet Banking in Northern Malaysia, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 11(2), Retrieved November 25, 2006, from http://www.arraydev.com/commerce/JIBC/2006–08/Thurasamy.asp.htm
17. Ramayah, T., Oh, S. M., & Omar, A. (2008). Behavioral Determinants of Online Banking Adoption: Some Evidence from a Multicultural Society. Journal on Management, 2(3), 29–37.
18. Riemenschneider, C. K., Harrison, D. A., & Mykytyn, P. P. (2003). Understanding IT adoption decisions in small business: integrating current theories. Information and Management, 40(4), 269–287.
19. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: a metaanalysis of past research with recommendations for modifcations and future research. Journal Consumer Behavior, 15(3), 325–343.
20. Shih, Y., & Fang, K. (2004). The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research, 14(3), 213–223.
21. Shih, Y., & Fang K. (2006). Effects of network quality attributes on customer adoption intentions of Internet Banking. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(1), 61–77.
22. Suh, B., & Han, I. (2002). Effects of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1(3/4), 247–263.
23. Tan, M., & Teo, T. S. H. (2000). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 1(5), 1–42.
24. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information System Research, 6(2), 144–174.
25. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
26. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why Don't Men Stop To Ask For Directions? Gender, Social Infuence, and Their Role in Technology Accep-tance and Usage Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139.
27. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
28. Wang, Yi-Shun., Wang, Yu-Min., Lin, Hsin-Hui., & Tang, Tzung-I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501–519.
29. Yi, M.Y., Jacson, J. D., Park J. S., & Probst, J. C. (2006). Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Information and Management