The Effects of Confidentiality on Nursing Self-Efficacy with Information Systems

International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI)

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 49-64

  Lending, Diane ^a   Dillon, Thomas ^a  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical information system; electronic patient record; medical record confidentiality; selfefficacy; system use; technology acceptance; user attitudes

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001608962     PISSN: 15553396     EISSN: 1555340X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jhisi.2007070105     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R.M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specifc computer self-efficacy - an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418–430.
2. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Ammenwerth, E., Mansmann, U., Iller, C., & Eich-stadter, R. (2002). Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: Results of a two-year study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10, 69–84.
4. Anderson, J.R.(2000). Security of the distributed electronic patient record: A case-based approach to identifying policy issues. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 60(2), 111–118.
5. Bandura, A.(1982). Self-effcacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
6. Brodt, A., & Stronge, J.H. (1986). Nurses' attitudes toward computerization in a mid-western community hospital. Computers in Nursing, 4, 82–86.
7. Chang, K., Lutes, K.D., Braswell, M.L., & Nielson, J.K. (2006). Nurses' perceptions of using a pocket pc for shift reports and patient care. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics, 1(1), 52–63.
8. Compeau, D.R., & Higgins, C.A. (1991, December 16–18). A social cognitive theory perspective on individual reactions to computing technology. In J. DeGross et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 187–198).
9. Compeau, D.R., & Higgins, C.A.(1995). Computer self-effcacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.
10. Curran, M., & Curran, K. (1991). The ethics of information. JONA, 21(1), 47–49.
11. Dillon, T.W., Crews, T.R., & Blankenship, R. (2005). Nursing attitudes and images of electronic patient record systems. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 23(3), 139–145.
12. Dillon, T.W., Lending, D., Crews, T.R., & Blanken-ship, R. (2003). Nursing self-effcacy of an integrated clinical and administrative information system. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 21(4), 198–205.
13. Dixon, R.D. (1999). The behavioral side of information technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 56, 117–123.
14. Ertmer, P.A., Evenbeck, E., Cennamo, K.S., & Lehman, J.D. (1994). Enhancing self-effcacy for computer technologies through the use of positive classroom experiences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 45–62.
15. Fischer, S., Stewart, T.E., Mehta, S., Wax, R., & Lapinsky, S.E. (2002). Handheld computing in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10, 139–149.
16. General Accounting Offce. (1991, January). Medical ADP systems automated medical records hold promise to improve patient care. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U. S. Senate (Rep. No. IMTEC-91–5).
17. Goldman, J. (1998). Protecting privacy to improve health care. Health Affairs, 17(6), 47–60.
18. Happ, B. (1991). Technology assessment and computers in nursing. CARING Newsletter, 6(1), 3.
19. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Of 1996, Public Law 104–191, 104th Congress. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from http://aspe.hhs. gov/admnsimp/pl104191.htm#1177.
20. Henderson, R.D., Deane, F.P., & Ward, M.J. (1995). Occupational differences in computer-related anxiety: Implications for the implementation of a computerized patient management information system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 14(1), 23–31.
21. Henry, J.W., & Stone, R.W. (1994). A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system. Information Resources Management Journal, 7(3), 21–33.
22. Henry, J.W., & Stone, R.W. (1995). Computer self-effcacy and outcome expectancy: The effects on the end-user's job satisfaction. Computer Personnel, 16(4), 15–34.
23. Hollenback, J.R., & Williams, C.R. (1996). Turnover functionality vs. turnover frequency: A note on work attitudes and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 647–656.
24. Kilbridge, P. (2003). The cost of HIPAA compliance. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348(15), 1423–1424.
25. Kluge, E.W. (2000). Professional codes for electronic HC record protection: Ethical, legal, economic, and structural issues. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 60(2), 85–96.
26. Lou Harris and Associates, Health Information Privacy Survey, 1993. Harris, New York, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996. (Reported in Goldman, 1998).
27. Marakas, G.M., Yi, M.Y., & Johnson, R.D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-effcacy: Toward clarifcation of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126–163.
28. McDowell, D., Dillon, T.W., Salimian, F., & Conklin, D. (1998). A preliminary study: Capturing perceived accuracy and confdentiality of traditional and computerized patient records. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Systems (pp. 780–783).
29. Milberg, S., Burke,S., Smith, J., & Kallman, E. (1995). Values, privacy, personal information and regulatory approaches. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 65–74.
30. NCVHS. (2000, August 21). The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from www.ncvhs.hhs.gov.
31. Ogletree, S.M., & Williams, S.W. (1990). Sex and sex-typing effects on computer attitudes and aptitude. Sex Roles, 23(11/12), 703–712.
32. Pillar, B., Jacox, A.K., & Redman, B.K. (1990). Technology, its assessment, and nursing. Nursing Outlook, 38(1), 16–19.
33. Priest, S. (1989). Understanding computer resources a health care perspective. Owings Mills, MD: National Health Publishing.
34. Rittman, M.R., & Gorman, R.H. (1992). Computerized databases: Privacy issues in the development of the nursing minimum data set. Computers in Nursing, 10(1), 14–18.
35. Safran, C., & Goldberg, H. (2000). Electronic patient records and the impact of the internet. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 60(2), 77–83.
36. Settle, R.B., Dillon, T.W., & Alreck, P.L. (1999). Acceptance of the phone-based interface for automatic call direction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18(2), 97–108.
37. Stockton, A.H., & Verhey, M.P. (1995). A psychometric examination of the stronge-brodt nurses' attitudes toward computers questionnaire. Computers in Nursing, 13(3), 109–113.
38. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.
39. Yasnoff, W.A., Overhage, J.M., Humphreys, B.L., & LaVenture, M. (2001). A national agenda for health informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 8(6), 535–545.