Neo-Symbiosis: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Information Interaction

International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI)

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 39-52

  Griffith, Douglas ^a   Greitzer, Frank L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

expert systems; human computer systems; human information systems; human computer interaction; information overload; information systems; intelligent support systems; interactive interface; knowledge based systems; person machine interaction; user support decision support systems DSS; user centered design; user machine dialog

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001578766     PISSN: 15573958     EISSN: 15573966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jcini.2007010103     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson, J. A. (2005a). Cognitive computation: The Ersatz brain project. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (pp. 2–3). IEEE Computer Society.
2. Anderson, J. A. (2005b). A brain-like computer for cognitive software applications: The Ersatz brain project. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (pp. 27–36). IEEE Computer Society.
3. Badalamente, R. V., & Greitzer, F. L. (2005). Top ten needs for intelligence analysis tool development. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, McLean, Virginia.
4. Croft, W. B. (1984). The role of context and adaptation in user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 283–292.
5. Dreyfus, H.L. (1992). What computers still can't do. MIT Press/Cambridge Press.
6. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.
7. Fitter, M. J., & Sime, M. E. (1980). Creating responsive computers: Responsibility and shared decision-making. In H. T. Smith & T. R. G. Green (Eds.), Human interaction with computers. London: Academic Press.
8. Fitts, P. M. (1951a). Engineering psychology and equipment design. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1287–1340). New York: Wiley.
9. Fitts, P. M. (Ed.) (1951b). Human engineering for an effective air navigation and traffic control system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, National Academy of Sciences.
10. Gasson, M., Hutt, B., Goodhew, I., Kyberd, P., & Warwick, K. (2002, September). Bidirectional human machine interface via direct neural connection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 265–270), Berlin, Germany.
11. Gershon, N. (1995). Human information interaction. In Proceedings of the WWW4 Conference, Boston, MA.
12. Greitzer, F. L. (2005a). Toward the development of cognitive task diffculty metrics to support intelligence analysis research. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (pp. 315–320). IEEE Computer Society.
13. Greitzer, F. L. (2005b). Extending the reach of augmented cognition to real-world decision making tasks. In Proceedings of the HCI International 2005/Augmented Cognition Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
14. Greitzer, F. L., Hershman, R. L., & Kaiwi, J. (1985). Intelligent interfaces for C2 operability. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
15. Griffth, D. (1990). Computer access for persons who are blind or visually impaired: Human factors issues. Human Factors, 32, 467–475.
16. Griffth, D. (2005a). Beyond usability: The new symbiosis. Ergonomics in Design, 13, 3.
17. Griffth, D. (2005b). Neo-symbiosis: A tool for diversity and enrichment. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://2005.cyberg.wits.ac.za.
18. Griffth, D., Gardner-Bonneau, D. J., Edwards, A. D. N., Elkind, J. I., & Williges, R. C. (1989). Human factors research with special populations will further advance the theory and practice of the human factors discipline. In Proceedings of the Human Factors 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 565–566), Santa Monica, CA. Human Factors Society.
19. Hancock, P. A., Pepe, A. A., & Murphy, L. (2005). Hedonomics: The power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergonomics in Design, 13, 8–14.
20. Hoffman, R. R., Feltovich, P. J., Ford, K. M., Woods, D. D., Klein, G., & Feltovich, A. (2002). A rose by any other name… would probably be given an acronym. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://www.ihmc.us/ research/projects/EssaysOnHCC/TheRose. pdf
21. Hollnagel, E., & Woods, D. D. (1983). Cognitive systems engineering: New wine in new bottles. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18, 583–600.
22. Reprinted (1999) in 30th Anniversary Issue of International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51, 339–356. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://www.idealibrary.com
23. Hughes, F. J., & Schum, D. A. (2003). Preparing for the future of intelligence analysis: Discovery - Proof - Choice. Unpublished manuscript. Joint Military Intelligence College.
24. Joy, B. (2000, April). Why the future doesn't need us. Wired, 8.04.
25. Kahneman, D. (2002, December 8). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Nobel Prize lecture.
26. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.
27. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffn, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kantor, P. B. (1980). Availability analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(6), 311–319. Reprinted (1980) in Key Papers in information science (pp. 368–376). White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications, Inc.
29. Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Penguin Group
30. Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE, 4–11.
31. Licklider, J. C. R., & Taylor, R. G. (1968, April). The computer as a communication device. Science & Technology, 76, 21–31.
32. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed). New York: Viking.
33. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity to process information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
34. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press/AP Professional.
35. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we wove (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
36. Norman, D. A. (2005). Human-centered design considered harmful. Interactions. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://delivery.acm. org/10.1145/1080000/1070976/p14-nor-man.html?key1=1070976&key2=3820555 211&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=5548 57554&CFTOKEN=554857554
37. Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User-centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Parasuraman, R. (2003). Neuroergonomics: Research and practice. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4(1–2), 5–20.
39. Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643–675.
40. Sanquist, T. F., Greitzer, F. L., Slavich, A., Littlefield, R., Littlefield, J., & Cowley, P. (2004). Cognitive tasks in information analysis: Use of event dwell time to characterize component activities. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana.
41. Schmorrow, D. D., & Kruse, A. A. (2004). Augmented cognition. In W. S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Berkshire encyclopedia of human computer interaction (pp. 54–59). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group.
42. Schmorrow, D., & McBride, D. (2005). Introduction to special issue on augmented cognition. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(2).
43. Scholtz, J., Morse, E., & Hewett, T. (2004, March). In depth observational studies of professional intelligence analysts. Paper presented at Human Performance, Situation Awareness, and Automation (HPSAA), Daytona Beach, FL. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/IAD-papers/2004/scholtz-morse-hewett.pdf
44. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
45. Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffn, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 379–396). New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational: Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning. Implications for the rationality debate. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffn, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to perceptual, neural, and social prospects New York: Wiley.
49. Wang, Y. (2005a). On cognitive properties of human factors in engineering. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (pp. 174–182). IEEE Computer Society.
50. Wang, Y. (2005b). On the cognitive properties of human perception. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (pp. 203–210). IEEE Computer Society.
51. Warwick, K., & Gasson, M. (2005). Human-machine symbiosis overview. In Proceedings of the HCI International 2005/Aug-mented Cognition Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
52. Wilkins, D. J. (2002, November). The bathtub curve and product failure behavior. Reliability HotWire, 21. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue21/hottopics21.htm
53. Zhang, J., & Norman, D. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 87–122.
54. Zsombok, C. E. (1997). Naturalistic decision making: Where are we now? In C. Zsombok & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.