Lone Geniuses in Popular Science: The Devaluation of Scientific Consensus

Written Communication

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 215-241

  Charney, Davida ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

18th century; history of science; popular science; rhetoric; science journalism; scientific discourse

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001192164     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088303257505     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Atkinson, D. (1999). Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The Philosophical Trans-actions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Campbell, W. (1997). The worm and the tumor: Reflections on Fibiger's Nobel Prize. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 40(4), 498-505.
4. Charney, D. (in press). Empiricism is not a four-letter word. In S. Selber & J. Johnson-Eilola (Eds.), Central works in technical communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.(Reprinted from College Composition and Communication, 47[4], 567-593, 1996)
5. Fahnestock, J. (1998). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 15(3), 330-350.(Reprinted from Written Communication, 3, 275-296, 1986)
6. Francis, D. H., & Sandberg, W. R. (2000). Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 5-25.
7. Gladwell, M. (2002, May 27). The televisionary: Big business and the myth of the lone inventor. The New Yorker, 112.
8. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
9. Gould, R. (1960). The Marine Chronometer. London: Holland Press. (Original work published in 1923)
10. Howse, D. (1989). Nevil Maskelyne: The seaman's astronomer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Jacob, M., & Reid, D. (2001). Technical knowledge and the mental universe of Manchester's early cotton manufacturers. Canadian Journal of History, 36, 283-304.
12. John Harrison and the Longitude Problem. (2002, January 23). Royal Observatory Greenwich. Available from http://www.rog.nmm.ac.uk/museum/harrison/
13. Katz, S. B. (1992). Narration, technical communication, and culture: The soul of a new machine as narrative romance. In M. Secor & D. Charney (Eds.), Constructing Rhetorical Education (pp. 382-402). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
14. Kaufer, D. S., & Geisler, C. (1989). Novelty in academic writing. Written Communication, 6, 286-311.
15. Kidder, T. (1982). The soul of a new machine. New York: Avon.
16. Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(1), 28-52.
18. Lanham, F. (1998, Oct 4). Dava Sobel: The illustrated longitude. The Houston Chronicle, p. 5
19. Mahoney, M. (1993). Longitude in the context of the history of science. In W. Andrewes (Ed.), The quest for longitude. London: Science Museum.
20. Myers, G. (1985a). The social construction of two biologists' proposals. Written Communication, 2, 219-245.
21. Myers, G. (1985b). Nineteenth century popularizations of thermodynamics and the rhetoric of social prophecy. Victorian Studies, 29, 35-66.
22. Myers, G. (2003). Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 265-272.
23. Neergaard, L. (2002, Oct 10). Mixed messages continue on breast cancer. The Cincinnati Post, p. B1.
24. Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology (Rev. ed.). New York: Freeman.
25. Observations of latitude and longitude at all remarkable points. (1996, June 19). An exhibition of maps and navigational instruments. On view in the Tracy W. McGregor Room, Alderman Library, University of Virginia, July 10 to September 26, 1995. Retrieved from http://www.lib.virginia.edu/speccol/exhibits/lewis_clark/ch5.html
26. Paul, D. (2002). Spreading chaos: The role of popular scientific literature in interdisciplinary diffusion. Paper presented at 10th biennial meeting of the Rhetoric Society of America, Las Vegas, NV, May 25, 2002.
27. Paul, D., Charney, D., & Kendall, A. (2001). Moving beyond the moment: Reception studies in the rhetoric of science. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 372-399.
28. Payne, A. A. (2003). The effects of congressional appropriation committee membership on the distribution of federal research funding to universities. Economic Inquiry, 41(2), 325-346.
29. Popper, K. (1971). The open society and its enemies (2 vols., 5th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Prince-ton University Press.
30. Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Prince-ton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Professions in 18th century Britain. (2000, February). History faculty lecture notes, Warwick University. Retrieved from http://www.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/History/teaching/courses/gender/prof.html
32. Reed, R. (2001). (Un-)Professional discourse? Journalists' and scientists' stories about science in the media. Journalism, 2(3), 279-298.
33. Rowan, K. (1989). Moving beyond the what to the why: Differences in professional and popular science writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 19, 161-179.
34. Sobel, D. (1996). Longitude: The true story of a lone genius who solved the greatest scientific problem of his time (paperback ed.). New York: Walker.
35. Sobel, D., & Andrewes, W. J. H. (1998). The illustrated longitude. New York: Walker.
36. Stewart, L. (1998). A meaning for machines: Modernity, utility, and the eighteenth-century British public. The Journal of Modern History, 70(2), 259-295.
37. Sturridge, C. (Writer/Director). (2000). Longitude [Motion picture]. United Kingdom: Granada Film Production.
38. Waldman, P., & Jamieson, K. H. (2003). Rhetorical convergence and issue knowledge in the 2000 presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33, 145-164.
39. Watson, J. (1980). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. In G. Stent (Ed.), Norton critical edition. New York: Norton.
40. Williams, C. J. (2001, December 2). Mistakes and oversights: Occasionally, those judging physics, chemistry and medicine are susceptible to the imperfections of human nature. Los Angeles Times, p. 40