A Genre System View of the Funding of Academic Research

Written Communication

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 7-36

  Tardy, Christine M ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

genre knowledge; genre systems; grant writing; intertextuality

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001187359     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088303253569     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
4. Beaufort, A. (1997). Operationalizing the concept of discourse community: A case study of one institutional site of composing. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 486-529.
5. Berkenkotter, C. (2001). Genre systems at work: DSM-IV and the rhetorical recontextualization in psychotherapy paperwork. Written Communication, 18, 326-349.
6. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10, 475-509.
7. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman.
9. Bhatia, V. K. (1999). Integrating products, processes, purposes and participants in professional writing. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 21-39). London: Longman.
10. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
11. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Connor, U. (2000). Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of U.S. humanists and scientists. Text, 20, 1-28.
13. Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 47-62.
14. Devitt, A. (1991). Intertextuality in accounting. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 336-337). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15. Devitt, A. (2000). Integrating rhetorical and literary theories of genre. College English, 62, 696-718.
16. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. New York: Longman.
17. Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kamberelis, G. (1995). Genre as institutionally informed social practice. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6, 115-171.
19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
21. Miller, C. R. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67-78). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
22. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
23. Paré, A. (2000). Writing as a way into social work: Genre sets, genre systems, and distributed cognition. In P. Dias & A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 145-166). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
24. Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
26. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: Academic writing in research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Winsor, D. A. (1999). Genre and activity systems: The role of documentation in maintaining and changing engineering activity systems. Written Communication, 16, 200-224.
28. Winsor, D. A. (2001). Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 5-28.