Assumption-versus data-based approaches to summarizing species’ ranges

Conservation Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 568-575

  Peterson, A Townsend ^a   Navarro Sigüenza, Adolfo G ^b   Gordillo, Alejandro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

animals; biogeography; birds; conservation planning; mapas de extensi n de presencia; patrones de distribuci n; predictive modeling; pruebas de modelos; reserve design; resoluci n espacial

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOGRAPHY; BIRD; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ELEVATION; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HABITAT SELECTION; NICHE; REMOTE SENSING; RESERVE DESIGN;

ANIMALIA; AVES;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM;

EID: 85001076447     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12801     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson RP, Gonzalez I. 2011. Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: an implementation with Maxent. Ecological Modelling 222:2796–2811.
2. Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Villalobos F. 2011. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecological Modelling 222:1810–1819.
3. Beresford AE, Buchanan GM, Donald PF, Butchart SHM, Fishpool LDC, Rondinini C. 2011. Poor overlap between the distribution of protected areas and globally threatened birds in Africa. Animal Conservation 14:99–107.
4. BirdLife International, and NatureServe. 2015. Range maps of bird species of the world. BirdLife International, Cambridge.
5. Boakes EH, McGowan PJK, Fuller RA, Chang-qing D, Clark NE, O'Connor K, Mace GM. 2010. Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data. PLoS Biology 8:(e1000385) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000385.
6. Bodbyl-Roels S, Peterson AT, Xiao X. 2011. Comparative analysis of remotely-sensed data products via ecological niche modeling of avian influenza case occurrences in Middle Eastern poultry. International Journal of Health Geographics 10:21.
7. Boria RA, Olson LE, Goodman SM, Anderson RP. 2014. Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecological Modelling 275:73–77.
8. Cord A, Rodder D. 2011. Inclusion of habitat availability in species distribution models through multi-temporal remote-sensing data? Ecological Applications 21:3285–3298.
9. Costa GC, Nogueira C, Machado RB, Colli GR. 2010. Sampling bias and the use of ecological niche modeling in conservation planning: a field evaluation in a biodiversity hotspot. Biodiversity and Conservation 19:883–899.
10. de Pous P, Beukema W, Weterings M, Dümmer I, Geniez P. 2011. Area prioritization and performance evaluation of the conservation area network for the Moroccan herpetofauna: a preliminary assessment. Biodiversity and Conservation 20:89–118.
11. Engler R, Guisan A, Rechsteiner L. 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:263–274.
12. Ficetola GF, Rondinini C, Bonardi A, Baisero D, Padoa-Schioppa E. 2015. Habitat availability for amphibians and extinction threat: a global analysis. Diversity and Distributions 21:302–311.
13. Harris G, Pimm SL. 2008. Range size and extinction risk in forest birds. Conservation Biology 22:163–171.
14. Harris GM, Pimm SL. 2004. Bird species' tolerance of secondary forest habitats and its effects on extinction. Conservation Biology 18:1607–1616.
15. Heywood DI, Cornelius S, Carver S. 1998. An introduction to geographical information systems. Addison Wesley Longman, New York.
16. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 2016. Spatial data download. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/spatial-data (accessed May 1, 2014).
17. Jenkins CN, Pimm SL, Alves MdS. 2011. How conservation GIS leads to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Natureza & Conservação 9:152–159.
18. Jetz W, Sekercioglu CH, Watson JE. 2008. Ecological correlates and conservation implications of overestimating species geographic ranges. Conservation Biology 22:110–119.
19. Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ. 2009. Maxent modeling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia. Journal of Ecology and Natural Environment 1:94–98.
20. Li BV, Pimm SL. 2015. China's endemic vertebrates sheltering under the protective umbrella of the giant panda. Conservation Biology 30:329–339.
21. Menon S, Choudhury BI, Khan ML, Peterson AT. 2010. Ecological niche modeling predicts new populations of Gymnocladus assamicus, a critically endangered tree species. Endangered Species Research 11:175–181.
22. Menon S, Khan ML, Paul A, Peterson AT. 2012. Rhododendron species in the Indian Eastern Himalayas: new approaches to understanding rare plant species' distributions. Journal of the American Rhododendron Society Spring 2012:78–84.
23. Moody A, Johnson DS. 2001. Land surface phenologies from AVHRR using the discrete Fourier transform. Remote Sensing of Environment 75:305–323.
24. Moreno R, Zamora R, Molina JR, Vasquez A, Herrera MÁ. 2011. Predictive modeling of microhabitats for endemic birds in south Chilean temperate forests using maximum entropy (Maxent). Ecological Informatics 6:364–370.
25. Mota-Vargas C, Rojas-Soto OR. 2012. The importance of defining the geographic distribution of species for conservation: the case of the Bearded Wood-Partridge. Journal for Nature Conservation 20:10–17.
26. Navarro-Sigüenza AG. 2002. Atlas de las aves de México: fase II; database from SNIB-CONABIO projects E018 y A002. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.
27. Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Peterson AT. 2004. An alternative species taxonomy of Mexican birds. Biota Neotropica 4: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v4n2/pt/abstract?article+BN02304022004.
28. Navarro Sigüenza AG, Peterson AT. 2007. Mapas de las aves de México Basados en WWW; final report SNIB-CONABIO project CE015. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico, D.F.
29. Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Peterson AT, Gordillo-Martínez A. 2002. A Mexican case study on a centralised database from world natural history museums. CODATA Journal 1:45–53.
30. Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Peterson AT, Gordillo-Martínez A. 2003. Museums working together: the atlas of the birds of Mexico. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 123A:207–225.
31. Ocampo-Peñuela N, Pimm SL. 2014. Setting practical conservation priorities for birds in the western Andes of Colombia. Conservation Biology 28:1260–1270.
32. Olson DM, et al. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51:933–938.
33. Openshaw S. 1984. The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Books, Norwich.
34. Ortega-Huerta MA, Martínez-Meyer E, Egbert SL, Price KP, Peterson AT. 2000. Mapping the land cover of Mexico using AVHRR time-series data sets. GeoCarto International 15:5–17.
35. Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG. 1999. Alternate species concepts as bases for determining priority conservation areas. Conservation Biology 13:427–431.
36. Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG. 2009. Constructing check-lists and avifauna-wide reviews: Mexican bird taxonomy revisited. Auk 126:915–921.
37. Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Hernández-Baños BE, Escalona-Segura G, Rebón-Gallardo F, Rodríguez-Ayala E, Figueroa-Esquivel EM, Cabrera-García L. 2003. The Chimalapas region, Oaxaca, Mexico: a high-priority region for bird conservation in Mesoamerica. Bird Conservation International 13:227–254.
38. Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Martínez-Meyer E, Cuervo-Robayo AP, Berlanga H, Soberón J. 2015. Twentieth century turnover of Mexican endemic avifaunas: landscape change versus climate drivers. Science Advances 1:e1400071.
39. Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Pereira RS. 2004. Detecting errors in biodiversity data based on collectors' itineraries. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 124:143–151.
40. Peterson AT, Papeş M, Soberón J. 2008. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modelling. Ecological Modelling 213:63–72.
41. Peterson AT, Radocy T, Hall E, Kerbis JP, Celesia GG. 2013. The potential distribution of the African lion in the face of changing global climate. Oryx 48:555–564.
42. Peterson AT, Soberón J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martínez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, Araújo MB. 2011. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
43. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190:231–259.
44. Qiao H, Soberón J, Peterson AT. 2015. No silver bullets in correlative ecological niche modeling: insights from testing among many potential algorithms for niche estimation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6:1126–1136.
45. Ramirez-Bastida P, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Peterson AT. 2008. Aquatic bird distributions in Mexico: designing conservation approaches quantitatively. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:2525-2558.
46. Rodrigues ASL, et al. 2004. Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. BioScience 54:1092–1100.
47. Rondinini C, et al. 2011. Global habitat suitability models of terrestrial mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 366:2633–2641.
48. Saupe EE, Barve V, Myers CE, Soberon J, Barve N, Hensz CM, Peterson AT, Owens HL, Lira-Noriega A. 2012. Variation in niche and distribution model performance: the need for a priori assessment of key causal factors. Ecological Modelling 237:11–22.
49. Schnell JK, Harris GM, Pimm SL, Russell GJ. 2013. Quantitative analysis of forest fragmentation in the Atlantic Forest reveals more threatened bird species than the current red list. PLoS ONE 8:(e65357) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065357.
50. Somveille M, Manica A, Butchart SH, Rodrigues AS. 2013. Mapping global diversity patterns for migratory birds. PLoS ONE 8:(e70907) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070907.
51. Sousa-Baena MS, Garcia LC, Peterson AT. 2013. Completeness of digital accessible knowledge of the plants of Brazil and priorities for survey and inventory. Diversity and Distributions 20:369–381.
52. Urbina-Cardona JN, Loyola RD. 2008. Applying niche-based models to predict endangered-hylid potential distributions: are neotropical protected areas effective enough. Tropical Conservation Science 1:417–445.
53. Warren DL, Seifert SN. 2011. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications 21:335–342.