The importance of defining the geographic distribution of species for conservation: The case of the Bearded Wood-Partridge

Journal for Nature Conservation

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 10-17

  Mota Vargas, Claudio ^a   Rojas Soto, Octavio R ^b  

^a CENTRO TLAXCALA DE BIOLOGÍA DE LA CONDUCTA   (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Average propinquity; Cartographic; Conservation; Dendrortyx barbatus; Distribution area; Ecological niche modeling; Free hand; Minimum convex polygon

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARTOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

DENDRORTYX BARBATUS;

EID: 84856589764     PISSN: 16171381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson R.P., Gómez-Laverde M., Peterson A.T. Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: Insights from predictive models. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2002, 11:131-141.
2. Aguilar S. Registro de la Perdiz veracruzana o Chivizcoyo (Dendrortyx barbatus Gould) en la Sierra Norte de Oaxaca. Huitzil 2000, 1:9-11.
3. Aguilar S. Perdiz veracruzana o Chivizcoyo (Dendrortyx barbatus). Conservación de aves: experiencias en México 2003, 167-168. D.F. CIPAMEX, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, CONABIO, México. H. Gómez de Silva, A. Oliveras de Ita (Eds.).
4. Arizmendi M.C., Márquez-Valdelamar áreas de Importancia para la Conservación de Aves en México 2000, CIPAMEX, México, D.F.
5. Birdlife International Threatened birds of the world 2000, Lynx Edicions and Birdlife International, Barcelona, España and Cambridge, UK.
6. Collar N.J., Gonzoga L.P., Krabbe N., Madroño N., Naranjo L.G., Parker T.A., et al. Threatened birds of the Americas 1992, International Council for Bird Preservation Cambridge, UK, pp. 167-170.
7. Davis I.L. Winter bird census at Xilitla, San Luis Potosi. Condor 1952, 54:345-350.
8. De Grammont P., Cuarón A.D. An evaluation of threatened species categorization systems used on the American continent. Conservation Biology 2006, 20:14-27.
9. Eitniear J.C., Aguilar S., Baccus J.T., Carroll J.P. Response rates of Bearded Wood-Partridges (Dendrortyx barbatus, Aves: Phasianidae) to play back of a recorded call. Vida Silvestre Neotropical 2001, 10:1-2.
10. Eitniear J.C., Aguilar S., González V., Pedraza R., Baccus J.T. New records of Bearded Wood-Partridge, Dendrortyx barbatus (Aves: Phasianidae) in México. Southwestern Naturalist 2000, 45:238-241.
11. Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Duk M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29:129-151.
12. Espinosa O.D., Llorente B.J. Fundamentos de biogeografías filogenéticas 1993, UNAM, México, D.F.
13. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) ArcView GIS, V. 3.2. 1999, ESRI Inc., CA, USA.
14. Graham H.C., Hijmans R.J. A comparison of methods for mapping species ranges and species richness. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2006, 15:578-587.
15. Global Biodiversity information facility 2010, (GBIF: www.gbif.org). Consulted: January.
16. Hijmans R.J., Cameron S.E., Parra J.L., Jones P.G., Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 2005, 25:1965-1978.
17. Hortal J., Jimenez-Valverde A., Gomez J., Lobo J.M., Baselga A. Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the specie. Oikos 2008, 117:847-858.
18. Howell S., Webb S. A guide to the bird of México and Northern Central American 1995, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
19. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informática) Cartas Topográficas 1:50000 1992, Aguascalientes, México.
20. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature IUCN Red list of threatened species 2009, (www.iucnredlist.org). Consulted: January 2010.
21. Kery M., Garner B., Monerat C. Predicting species distributions from checklist data using site occupancy models. Journal of Biogeography 2010, 37:1851-1862.
22. Krebs C.J. Ecología estudios de la distribución y la abundancia 2001, Oxford University Press, México, D.F. 2nd ed.
23. Lamoureux J.F., Morrison J.C., Ricketts T.H., Olson D.M., Denerstein E., McKhight M.W., et al. Global test of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature 2006, 440:214-221.
24. Lobo M.J., Baselga A., Hortal J., Jiménez-Valverde A., Gómez J.F. How does the knowledge about the spatial distribution of Iberian dung beetle species accumulate over time?. Diversity and Distributions 2007, 13:772-780.
25. Lombard A.T., Hilton-Taylor C., Rebelo A.G., Pressey R.L., Cowling R.M. Reserve selection in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa: Coping with high compositions turnover. Plant Ecology 1999, 142:35-55.
26. Lowery H.J., Newman J.R. Notes on the ornithology of southern San Luis Potosí. Wilson Bulletin 1951, 63:315-322.
27. Martínez-Morales M. Avifauna del bosque mesófilo de montaña del noreste de Hidalgo, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 2007, 78:149-162.
28. Martínez-Meyer E., Peterson A.T., Servín J.I., Kiff L.F. Ecological niche modeling and prioritizing areas for species reintroductions. Oryx 2006, 40:411-418.
29. McPherson M.J., Jetz W. Type and spatial structure of distribution data and the perceived determinants of geographical gradients in ecology: The species richness of African birds. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2007, 16:657-667.
30. Mota-Vargas C. Distribución, abundancia relativa y uso de hábitat del chivizcoyo Dendrortyx barbatus (Aves: Odontophoridae) en el municipio de Coatepec 2008, Ver. Tesis Universidad Veracruzana.
31. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., Fonseca B., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
32. Navarro A.G., Peterson A.T., Gordillo-Martínez A. Museums working together: The atlas of the birds of Mexico. Bulletin British Ornithologists' Club Supplement 2003, 123A:207-225.
33. Noss R.F. Conservation targets and information needs for regional conservation planning. Natural Areas Journal 2004, 24:223-231.
34. Pearson R.G., Raxworthy C., Nakamura M., Peterson A.T. Predicting species' distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography 2006, 34:102-117.
35. Peterson A.T. Predicting species geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor 2001, 103:599-605.
36. Peterson A.T., Navarro A.G. Alternate species concepts as bases for determining priority conservation areas. Conservation Biology 1999, 13:427-431.
37. Peterson A.T., Nyári A.S. Ecological niche conservatism and Pleistocene refugia in the Thrush-likeMourner, Schiffornis sp., in the Neotropics. Evolution 2008, 62:173-183.
38. Peterson A.T., Papes M., Eaton M. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: A comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography 2007, 30:550-560.
39. Phillips S.J., Anderson R.P., Schapire R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 2006, 190:231-259.
40. Pineda E., Lobo M. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns. Journal of Animal Ecology 2009, 78:182-190.
41. Rapoport H.E. Aerografía estrategias geográficas de las especies 1975, Fondo de cultura económica, México, D.F.
42. REMIB Red Mundial de Información sobre Biodiversidad 2010, (REMIB http://www.conabio.gob.mx). Consulted: January.
43. Rojas-Soto O., Según-Sanchez F.J., Navarro-Sigüenza A. Aditional information on the avifauna of Queretaro, México. Cotinga 2001, 15:48-52.
44. Rojas-Soto O., Martínez-Meyer E., Navarro-Sigüenza A., Oliveras de Ita A., Gomez de Silva H., Peterson T. Modeling distributions of disjunct populations of the Sierra Madre Sparrow. Journal of Field Ornithology 2008, 79:245-253.
45. Sánchez O., Medellín R., Aldama A., Goettsch B., Soberón J., Tambutti M. Método de Evaluación del Riesgo de extinción de las especies silvestres en México (MER) 2007, SEMARNAT-Instituto nacional de Ecología-Instituto de Ecología, UNAM - Comisión nacional para el uso de la biodiversidad, CONABIO, México, D.F.
46. SEMARNAT. (2010). (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación, segunda sección, 30 de diciembre de 2010, 1-77.
47. Soberón J. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:1115-1123.
48. Soberón J., Peterson T.A. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2005, 2:1-10.
49. Stattersfield A.J., Crosby M.J., Long A.J., Wege D.C. Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for bird conservations 1998, Birdlife Conservations Series No. 7 Birdlife International, Cambridge, UK.
50. Stockwell D., Peters D. The GARP modeling system: Problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Geographical Information Science 1999, 2:143-158.
51. Tsoar A., Allouche O., Steinitz O., Rotem D., Kadmon R. A comparative evaluation of presence-only methods for modeling species distribution. Diversity and Distributions 2007, 13:397-405.
52. USGS (United States Geological Survey) HYDRO 1K: elevation derivative database 2001, http://edc.usgs.gov/products/elevation/gtopo30/hydro/namerica.html.
53. Villa-Bonilla B., Rojas-Soto O., Colodner-Chamudis G., Tejeda-Cruz C. Inventarios municipales de avifauna y su aplicación a la conservación el caso de Zacapoaxtla, Puebla, México. Ornitología Neotropical 2008, 19:531-551.
54. Warren D.L., Glor R.E., Turelli M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 2008, 62:2868-2883.
55. Zunino M., Zullini A. Biogeografía la dimensión espacial de la evolución 2003, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, D.F.