Automatic detection of orthographic cues for cognate recognition

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 2387-2390

  Mulloni, Andrea ^a   Pekar, Viktor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC DETECTION; BILINGUAL DICTIONARY; EDIT DISTANCE; LEXICAL RESOURCES; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; ORTHOGRAPHIC SIMILARITY; PRE-PROCESSING STEP; RECENT RESEARCHES;

EID: 85000972459     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas on Envisioning Machine Translation in the Information Future, Springer Verlag, London, 158-168.
2. Inkpen, D., Frunza, O., Kondrak, G. (2005). Automatic Identification of Cognates and False Friends in French and English. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 251-257.
3. Koehn, P., Knight, K. (2002). Estimating Word Translation Probabilities from Unrelated Monolingual Corpora Using the EM Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 17th AAAI, 711-715.
4. th Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, 44-59.
5. th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 952-958.
6. Levenshtein, V. (1965). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 163(4):845-848.
7. nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 151-158.
8. Melamed, D. (1999). Bitext Maps and Alignment via Pattern Recognition. Computational Linguistics, 25(1), 107-130.
9. th International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation, Montreal, Canada, 67-81.