Chilean consumers' perception about animal welfare in dairy production systems: Short communication

Animal Production Science

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 147-151

  Vargas Bello Pérez, Einar ^a   Riveros, José Luis ^a   Köbrich, Claus ^b   Álvarez Melo, Pamela Alejandra ^a   Lensink, Joop ^c  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^c Equipe CASE   (France)

Author keywords

animal production; consumer; dairy products

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL WELFARE; CONSUMER-RESOURCE INTERACTION; DAIRY FARMING; GENDER; MILK PRODUCTION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

CHILE; LATIN AMERICA; METROPOLITANA;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 85000915474     PISSN: 18360939     EISSN: 18365787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AN14968     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adimark (2004) Mapa socioeconómico de Chile. Available at http://www.adimark.cl/medios/estudios/informe-mapa-socioeconomico-de-chile.pdf [Verified 5 May 2015]
2. Beardsworth A, Bryman A, Keil T, Goode J, Haslam C, Lancashire E (2002) Women, men and food: the significance of gender for nutritional studies and choices. British Food Journal 104, 470-491. doi:10.1108/00070700210418767
3. Bennett RM, Anderson J, Blaney RJP (2002) Moral intensity and willingness to pay concerning farm animal welfare issues and the implications for agricultural policy. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 15, 187-202. doi:10.1023/A:1015036617385
4. Cicia G, Colantuoni F (2010) Willingness to pay for traceable meat attributes: a meta-analysis. International Journal on Food System Dynamics 3, 252-263.
5. Engel J, Blackwell R, Miniard P (1995) Consumer behavior. In 'The consumer decision process'. 5th edn. (The Dryden Press: Hinsdale, IL)
6. Fraser D (2008) Toward a global perspective on farm animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113, 330-339. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.011
7. Guatteo R, Levionnois O, Fournier D, Guémené D, Latouche K, Leterrier C, Mormède P, Prunier A, Servière J, Terlouw C, Le Neindre P (2012) Minimising pain in farm animals: the 3S approach-supress, substitute, soothe. Animal 6, 1261-1274. doi:10.1017/S1751731112000262
8. Harper G, Henson S (2001) 'Consumer values and farm animal welfare-the Comparative Report.' EU FAIR CT 98-3678. (The University of Reading: Reading, UK)
9. Harvey D, Hubbard C (2013) Reconsidering the political economy of farm animal welfare: an anatomy of market failure. Food Policy 38, 105-114. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.11.006
10. Herzog H, Betchart N, Pittman R (1991) Sex role identity and attitudes toward animals. Anthrozoos 5, 93-105.
11. Keeling LJ, ImminkV, HubbardC, Garrod G, Edwards S, Ingenbleek P (2012) Designing animal welfare policies and monitoring progress. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 21, 95-105. doi:10.7120/096272812X13345905673845
12. Köbrich K, Maino M, Diaz C (2001) El bienestar animal como atributo de diferenciación en la compra de alimentos de origen animal. Economía Agraria 6, 251-260.
13. Lagerkvist CJ, Hess S (2011) A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. European Review of Agriculture Economics 38, 55-78. doi:10.1093/erae/jbq043
14. María GA (2006) Public perception of farm animal welfare in Spain. Livestock Science 103, 250-256. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.011
15. Millman ST (2009) Animal welfare-scientific approaches to the issues. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 12, 88-96. doi:10.1080/10888700902719591
16. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Sepúlveda WS, Villarroel M, María GA (2013) Attitudes of meat retailers to animal welfare in Spain. Meat Science 95, 569-575. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.046
17. Roex J, Miele M (2005) Farm animal welfare concerns: consumers, retailers and producers. Welfare quality reports No. 1. Available at http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/cplan/sites/default/files/WQReport-1-0.pdf [Verified 17 August 2015]
18. Santurtun Oliveros E, Tapia Perez G, Gonzalez-Rebeles C, Galindo Maldonado F (2012) Consumer attitudes and perceptions towards sustainable animal production attributes in Mexico City. Veterinaria (México) 43, 87-101.
19. Schnettler M, Vidal R, Silva R, Vallejos L, Sepúlveda N (2008) Consumer perception of animal welfare and livestock production in the Araucania region, Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 68, 80-93. doi:10.4067/S0718-58392008000100008
20. Steenkamp J (1989) Product quality: an investigation into the concept and how it is perceived by consumers. Van Gorcum, Assen/Maastricht, The Netherlands.
21. Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens F (2007) Segmentation based on consumers' perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15, 84-100.
22. Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Van Poucke E, Buijs S, Tuyttens FAM (2009) Societal concern related to stocking density, pen size and group size in farm animal production. Livestock Science 123, 16-22. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.09.023
23. Verbeke W (2009) Stakeholder, citizen and consumer interests in farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 18, 325-333.