Stakeholder, citizen and consumer interests in farm animal welfare

Animal Welfare

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 325-333

  Verbeke, W ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Citizens; Consumers; Labelling; Quality; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL WELFARE; ATTITUDE; CATTLE; CITIZENSHIP; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSUMER; FARM ANIMAL; FOOD CHAIN; LIVESTOCK; MARKET; NONHUMAN; PIG FARMING; PISCICULTURE; PURCHASING; QUALITY CONTROL; SHEEP; SOCIAL CLASS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 70449670767     PISSN: 09627286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Anwander Phan-Huy S and Badertscher Fawaz R 2003 Swiss market for meat from animal-friendly production: Responses of public and private actors in Switzerland. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16: 119-136 (Pubitemid 36551763)
2. Bennett RM, Anderson J and Blaney RJP 2002 Moral intensity and willingness to pay concerning farm animal welfare issues and the implications for agricultural policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15: 187-202 (Pubitemid 34527724)
3. Bock BB and van Huik MM 2007 Animal welfare: the attitudes and behaviour of European pig farmers. British Food Journal 109: 931-944 (Pubitemid 47574562)
4. Bracke MBM, De Greef K and Hopster H 2005 Qualitative stakeholder analysis for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18: 27-56 (Pubitemid 40240412)
5. Brown KH and Hollingsworth J 2005 The Food Marketing Institute and the National Council of Chain Restaurants: animal welfare and the retail food industry in the United States of America. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 24: 655-663 (Pubitemid 41674192)
6. Chang H-S and Kinnucan H 1991 Advertising, information and product quality: the case of butter. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 1195-1203
7. De Greef K, Stafleu F and De Lauwere C 2006 A simple value-distinction approach aids transparency in farm animal welfare debate. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19: 57-66
8. Edge MK and Barnett JL 2008 Development and integration of animal welfare standards into company quality assurance programs in the Australian livestock (meat) processing industry. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 1009-1013
9. European Commission 2006 Special Eurobarometer 238 'Risk Issues'. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg
10. Grunert KG 2006 Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Science 74: 149-160
11. Hall C and Sandilands V 2007 Public attitudes to the welfare of broiler chickens. Animal Welfare 16: 499-512 (Pubitemid 350064931)
12. Heleski CR and Zanella AJ 2006 Animal science student attitudes to farm animal welfare. Anthrozoos 19: 3-16
13. Hubbard C, Bourlakis M and Garrod G 2007 Pig in the middle: farmers and the delivery of farm animal welfare standards. British Food Journal 109: 919-930 (Pubitemid 47574561)
14. Kahneman D and Tversky A 1979 Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263-291
15. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL and Thaler RH 1991 Anomalies, the endowment effect, loss aversion and status-quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 193-206
16. Kendall H, Lobao L and Sharp J 2006 Public concern with animal well-being: place, social structural location, and individual experience. Rural Sociology 71: 399-428 (Pubitemid 44445630)
17. Korthals M 2001 Taking consumers seriously: Two concepts of consumer sovereignty. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14: 201-215 (Pubitemid 33816499)
18. Liljenstolpe C 2008 Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: an application to Swedish pig production. Agribusiness 24: 67-84
19. McCluskey JJ and Swinnen JFM 2004 Political economy of the media and consumer perceptions of biotechnology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 1230-1237
20. Meuwissen MPM, Van Der Lans IA and Huirne RBM 2007 Consumer preferences for pork supply chain attributes. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences 54: 293-312 (Pubitemid 46578961)
21. Miele M and Bock B 2007 Competing discourses of farm animal welfare and agri-food restructuring. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15: 1-7
22. Mizerski R 1982 An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavourable information. Journal of Consumer Research 9: 301-310
23. Petit J and van der Werf HMG 2003 Perception of the environmental impacts of current and alternative modes of pig production by stakeholder groups. Journal of Environmental Management 68: 377-386 (Pubitemid 37184500)
24. Pines MK, Petherick JC, Gaughan JB and Phillips CJC 2007 Stakeholders' assessment of animal welfare indicators for sheep and cattle exported by sea from Australia. Animal Welfare 16: 489-498
25. Ransom E 2007 The rise of agricultural animal welfare standards as understood through a neo-institutional lens. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15: 26-44
26. Salaün Y and Flores K 2001 Information quality: meeting the needs of the consumer. International Journal of Information Management 21: 21-37 (Pubitemid 32874453)
27. Schnettler B, Vidal R, Silva R, Vallejos L and Sepulveda N 2008 Consumer perception of animal welfare and livestock production in the Araucania Region, Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 68: 80-93
28. Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Van Poucke E and Tuyttens FAM 2007 Segmentation based on consumers' perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15: 84-100
29. Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Van Poucke E and Tuyttens FAM 2008 Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livestock Science 116: 126-136
30. Verbeke W 2005 Agriculture and the food industry in the information age. European Review of Agricultural Economics 32: 347-368 (Pubitemid 41442733)
31. Verbeke W 2008 Impact of communication on consumers' food choices. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 67: 281-288
32. Verbeke W and Vackier I 2004 Profile and effect of consumer involvement in fresh meat. Meat Science 67: 159-168 (Pubitemid 38137293)
33. Verbeke W and Viaene J 2000 Ethical challenges for livestock production: Meeting consumer concerns about meat safety and animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12: 141-151
34. Verbeke W and Ward RW 2001 A fresh meat almost ideal demand system incorporating negative TV press and advertising impact. Agricultural Economics 25: 349-374
35. Verbeke W and Ward RW 2006 Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: an application of ordered probit models to beef labels. Food Quality and Preference 17: 453-467
36. Verbeke W, Pieniak Z, Brunsø K, Scholderer J and Olsen SO 2008 Evaluating consumer information needs in the purchase of seafood products. In: Børresen T (ed) Improving Seafood Products for the Consumer pp 63-84. Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK
37. Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Sioen I, Van Camp J and De Henauw S 2007 Perceived importance of fish ethics and sustainability: a consumer behavior perspective. Ambio 36: 580-585 (Pubitemid 350305269)
38. Vermeir I and Verbeke W 2006 Sustainable food consumption: exploring the 'attitude-behavioural intention' gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19: 169-194
39. Wilson TD 1981 On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation 37: 3-15