Effects of computer reminders on complications of peripheral venous catheters and nurses' adherence to a guideline in paediatric care-a cluster randomised study

Implementation Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Förberg, Ulrika ^a,b   Unbeck, Maria ^c   Wallin, Lars ^a,d   Petzold, Max ^d,e   Ygge, Britt Marie ^b   Ehrenberg, Anna ^a  

^a DALARNA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support system; Clinical practice guideline; Cluster RCT; Computer reminder; Context; Implementation; Paediatric; Peripheral venous catheter

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALBERTA; CATHETERIZATION; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; MEDICAL ERROR; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING; NURSING STAFF; PEDIATRIC NURSING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REMINDER SYSTEM; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALBERTA; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MEDICAL ERRORS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PEDIATRIC NURSING; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85000702158     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0375-9     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Pettit J. Assessment of the infant with a peripheral intravenous device. Advances in Neonatal Care. 2003;3(5):230-40.
2. Reigart JR, Chamberlain KH, Eldridge D, O'Brien ES, Freeland KD, Larsen P, et al. Peripheral intravenous access in pediatric inpatients. Clinical Pediatrics. 2012;51:468-72.
3. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. American Journal of Infection Control. 2011;39 Suppl 1:S1-34.
4. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implementation science. 2012;7:50.
5. Gabbay J, Le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed "mindlines?" Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. British Medical Journal. 2004; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1013
6. Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care. 1998;7:149-58.
7. Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A, et al. Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2002;11:174-80.
8. Kitson AL, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implementation science. 2008;3:1.
9. McCormack B, Kitson A, Harvey G, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Seers K. Getting evidence into practice: the meaning of 'context'. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002;38:94-104.
10. Helfrich CD, Li YF, Sharp ND, Sales AE. Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implementation Science. 2009;4:38.
11. Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Chandler J, Hawkes CA, Crichton N, Allen C, et al. The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework. Implementation Science. 2013;8:28.
12. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science. 2009;4:50.
13. Gordon RB, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Rowe RE, Wyatt JC. On-screen computer reminders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1998. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001096.
14. Choi M, Choi R, Bae Y, Lee S. Clinical decision support systems for patient safety, a focus group need assessment with Korean ICU nurses. Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2011;29:671-8.
15. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
16. Randell R, Mitchell N, Dowding D, Cullum N, Thompson C. Effects of computerized decision support systems on nursing performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2007;12:242-9.
17. Anderson JA, Willson P. Clinical decision support systems in nursing: synthesis of the science for evidence-based practice. Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2008;26:151-8.
18. Fossum M, Ehnfors M, Svensson E, Hansen LH, Ehrenberg A. Effects of a computerized decision support system on care planning for pressure ulcers and malnutrition in nursing homes: an intervention study. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2013;82:911-21.
19. Cho I, Park I, Kim E, Lee E, Bates DW. Using EHR data to predict hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a prospective study of a Bayesian Network model. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2013;82:1059-67.
20. Lyerla F. Design and implementation of a nursing clinical decision support system to promote guideline adherence. Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2008;26:227-33.
21. Piscotty RJ, Jr KB. The relationship between electronic nursing care reminders and missed nursing care. Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2014;32:475-81.
22. Forberg U, Johansson E, Ygge BM, Wallin L, Ehrenberg A. Accuracy in documentation of peripheral venous catheters in paediatric care: an intervention study in electronic patient records. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2012;21:1339-44.
23. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment. 2004;8:1-72.
24. Donner A, KlarN. Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research. London: Edward Arnold; 2000.
25. Estabrooks CA, Squires JE, Cummings GG, Birdsell JM, Norton PG. Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool. BMC Health Services Research. 2009;9:234.
26. Estabrooks CA, Squire J, Adachi A, Kong LPGN. Utilization of health research in acute care settings in Alberta Technical Report. Alberta: University of Alberta, Canada; 2008.
27. Cummings GG, Hutchinson AM, Scott SD, Norton PG, Estabrooks CA.The relationship between characteristics of context and research utilization in a pediatric setting. BMC Health Services Research. 2010;10:168.
28. Estabrooks CA, Squires JE, Hutchinson AM, Scott S, Cummings GG, Kang SH, et al. Assessment of variation in the Alberta Context Tool: the contribution of unit level contextual factors and specialty in Canadian pediatric acute care settings. BMC Health Service Research. 2011;11:251.
29. Scott SD, Grimshaw J, Klassen TP, Nettel-Aguirre A, Johnson DW. Understanding implementation processes of clinical pathways and clinical practice guidelines in pediatric contexts: a study protocol. Implementation Science. 2011;6:133.
30. Squires JE, Estabrooks CA, Scott SD, Cummings GG, Hayduk L, Kang SH, et al. The influence of organizational context on the use of research by nurses in Canadian pediatric hospitals. BMC Health Service Research. 2013;13:351.
31. Eldh AC, Ehrenberg A, Squires JE, Estabrooks CA, Wallin L. Translating and testing the Alberta Context Tool for use among nurses in Swedish elder care. BMC Health Services Research, 13:68. 2013;13:478
32. Squires JE, Hutchinson AM, Hayduk L, Cranley L, Cummings G, Norton PG, et al. Alberta Context Tool: user manual. Knowledge Utilization Studies Program: Faculty of Nursing, University ofAlberta, Edmonton, Canada; 2014. ISBN 978-1-55195-340-3.
33. Forberg U, Wallin L, Johansson E, Ygge BM, Backheden M, Ehrenberg A. Relationship between work context and adherence to a clinical practice guideline for peripheral venous catheters among registered nurses in pediatric care. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2014;11:227-39.
34. Wallin L, Estabrooks CA, Midodzi WK, Cummings GG. Development and validation of a derived measure of research utilization by nurses. Nursing Research. 2006;55:149-60.
35. Cummings GG, Estabrooks CA, Midodzi WK, Wallin L, Hayduk L. Influence of organizational characteristics and context on research utilization. Nursing Research. 2007;56(Suppl 1):24-39.
36. Roshanov PS, Fernandes N, Wilczynski JM, Hemens BJ, You JJ, Handler SM, et al. Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials. British Medical Journal. 2013;346:f657.
37. Squires JE, Sullivan K, Eccles MP, Worswick J, Grimshaw JM. Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews. Implementation Science. 2014;9:152.
38. Fossum M, Ehnfors M, Svensson E, Hansen LH, Ehrenberg A. Effects of a computerized decision support system on pressure ulcers and malnutrition in nursing homes for the elderly. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2011;80:607-17.
39. Hagiwara MA, Sjoqvist BA, Lundberg L, Suserud BO, Henricson M, Jonsson A. Decision support system in prehospital care: a randomized controlled simulation study. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2013;31:145-53.
40. Beeckman D, Clays E, Van Hecke A, Vanderwee K, Schoonhoven L, Verhaeghe S. A multi-faceted tailored strategy to implement anelectronic clinical decision support system for pressure ulcer prevention in nursing homes: a two-armed randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2013;50:475-86.
41. Eldh AC, Tollne A, Förberg U, Wallin L. What registered nurses do and do not in the management of pediatric peripheral venous catheters and guidelines: unpacking the outcomes of computer reminders. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2016; 20. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12130.
42. Gifford WA, Davies BL, Graham ID, Tourangeau A, Woodend AK, Lefebre N. Developing leadership capacity for guideline use: a pilot cluster randomized control trial. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2013;10:51-65.
43. Unbeck M, Förberg U, Ygge BM, Ehrenberg A, Petzold M, Johansson E. Peripheral venous catheter related complications are common among paediatric and neonatal patients. Acta Paediatrica. 2015;104:566-74.
44. Nichols A. An investigation of the division between espoused and actual practise in infection control and of the knowledge sources that may underpin this division. British Journal of Infection Control. 2008;9:11-5.