Stacked global satellite gravity profiles

GEOPHYSICS

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1748-1755

  Yale, Mara M ^a,b   Sandwell, D T ^c  

^a ERIM International   (United States)

^b MATHWORKS INC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85000337603     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444680     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Andersen, O. B., and Knudsen, P., 1998, Global marine gravity field from the ERS-1 and Geosat geodetic mission altimetry: J. Geophys. Res., 103, 8129-8137.
2. Biegert, E. K., and Millegan, P. S., 1998, Beyond recon: The new world of gravity and magnetics: Leading Edge, 17, 41-42.
3. Cazenave, A., Schaeffer, P., Berge, M., Brossier, C., Dominh, K., and Gennero, M. C., 1996, High-resolution mean sea surface computed with altimeter data of ERS-1 (geodetic mission) and Topex-Poseidon: Geophys. J. Internat., 125, 696-704.
4. Green, C. M., Fairhead, J. D., and Maus, S., 1998, Satellite-derived gravity: Where we are and what's next: Leading Edge, 17, 77-79.
5. Haxby, W. F., Kramer, G. D., LaBrecque, J. L., and Weissel, J. K., 1983, Digital images of combined oceanic and continental data sets and their use in tectonic studies: EOS Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 64, 995-1004.
6. Heiskanen, W. A., and Moritz, H., 1967, Physical geodesy: W. H. Freeman & Co.
7. Hwang, C., and Parsons, B., 1996, An optimal procedure for deriving marine gravity from multi-satellite altimetry: Geophys. J. Internat., 125, 705-718.
8. Laxon, S., and McAdoo, D., 1994, Arctic ocean gravity field derived from ERS-1 satellite altimetry: Science, 265, 621-624.
9. _ 1997, Antarctic Tectonics: Constraints from an ERS-1 satellite marine gravity field: Science, 276, 556-560.
10. Marks, K. M., 1996, Resolution of the Scripps/NOAA marine gravity field from satellite altimetry: Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2069-2072.
11. Nerem, R. S., et al., 1994, Gravity model development for the TOPEX/ POSEIDON; Joint gravity models 1 and 2: J Geophys. Res., 99, 24 421-24 447.
12. Rapp, R., and Yi, Y., 1997, Role of ocean variability and dynamic ocean topography in the recovery of the mean sea surface and gravity anomalies from satellite altimeter data: J. Geodesy, 71, 617-629.
13. Rummel, R., and Haagmans, R. H. N., 1990, Gravity gradients from satellite altimetry: Marine Geodesy, 14, 1-12.
14. Sandwell, D. T., and Smith, W. H. F., 1997, Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS-1 satellite altimetry: J. Geophys. Res., 102, 10 039-10 054.
15. Scharroo, R., and Visser, P., 1998, Precise orbit determination and gravity field improvement for the ERS satellites: J. Geophys. Res., 103, 8113-8127.
16. Small, C., and Sandwell, D. T., 1992, A comparison of satellite and shipboard gravity measurements in the Gulf of Mexico: Geophysics, 57, 885-893.
17. Welch, P. D., 1967, The use of the fast Fourier transform for estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short modified periodograms: IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust., AU15, 70-73.
18. Yale, M. M., Sandwell, D. T., and Herring, A. T., 1998, What are the limitations of satellite altimetry?: Leading Edge, 17, 73-76.
19. Yale, M. M., Sandwell, D. T., and Smith, W. H. F., 1995, Comparison of along-track resolution of stacked Geosat, ERS 1, and TOPEX satellite altimeters: J. Geophys. Res., 100, 15 117-15 127.