Using ecosystem service trade-offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 527-532

  Zheng, Hua ^a   Li, Yifeng ^a   Robinson, Brian E ^b   Liu, Gang ^a   Ma, Dongchun ^c   Wang, Fengchun ^c   Lu, Fei ^a   Ouyang, Zhiyun ^a   Daily, Gretchen C ^d  

^a RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Beijing Water Science and Technology Institute   (China)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FOREST COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; POLICY MAKING; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; SURFACE WATER; URBAN AREA; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA; MIYUN RESERVOIR;

EID: 84999885257     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fee.1432     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, and Winthrop R. 2013. Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: a case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosyst Serv 5: 40–50.
2. Brinson MM and Eckles SD. 2011. US Department of Agriculture conservation program and practice effects on wetland ecosystem services: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 21: S116–27.
3. Cao SX, Chen L, Shankman D, et al. 2011. Excessive reliance on afforestation in China's arid and semi-arid regions: lessons in ecological restoration. Earth-Sci Rev 104: 240–45.
4. Chen Y, Ma QY, Wang YT, et al. 2007. Water chemical properties of Miyun Reservoir, Beijing and the main rivers flowing into the reservoir. Beijing Linye Daxue Xuebao (J Beijing Forestry Univ) 29: 105–11.
5. Chisholm RA. 2010. Trade-offs between ecosystem services: water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot. Ecol Econ 69: 1973–87.
6. Cooper JR, Gilliam JW, Daniels RB, et al. 1987. Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51: 416–20.
7. Correll D. 1997. Buffer zones and water quality protection: general principles. In: Haycock N, Burt T, Goulding K, and Pinay G (Eds). Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection. Proceedings of the International Conference on Buffer Zones. Harpenden, UK: Quest Environmental.
8. Daily GC, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, et al. 2013. Securing natural capital and human well-being: innovation and impact in China. Acta Ecol Sin 33: 677–92.
9. de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7: 260–72.
10. Dosskey M, Wells G, Bentrup G, and Wallace D. 2012. Enhancing ecosystem services: designing for multifunctionality. J Soil Water Conserv 67: 37A–41A.
11. Euliss NH, Smith LM, Liu SG, et al. 2011. Integrating estimates of ecosystem services from conservation programs and practices into models for decision makers. Ecol Appl 21: S128–34.
12. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309: 570–74.
13. Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, et al. 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 7565–70.
14. Gordon LJ, Peterson GD, and Bennett EM. 2008. Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 211–19.
15. Hoyer W and Chang H. 2014. Assessment of freshwater ecosystem services in the Tualatin and Yamhill basins under climate change and urbanization. Appl Geogr 53: 402–16.
16. Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, et al. 2011. Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17. Li C, Zheng H, Li SZ, et al. 2015. Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales. P Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 7396–401.
18. Li YF, Luo YC, Liu G, et al. 2013. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services – a case study in Miyun Reservoir watershed. Acta Ecol Sin 33: 726–36.
19. Lowrance R, McIntyre S, and Lance C. 1988. Erosion and deposition in a field forest system estimated cesium-137 activity. J Soil Water Conserv 43: 195–99.
20. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.
21. Ministry of Water Resource of China. 2013. Technical guidelines for construction of the ecological-clean small watersheds. Beijing, China: China Water & Power Press.
22. Morrison SW. 1988. The Percival Creek corridor plant. J Soil Water Conserv 43: 465–67.
23. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7: 4–11.
24. Ouyang ZY and Zheng H. 2014. Ecological security strategies. Beijing, China: Xuexi Press & Hainan Press (in Chinese).
25. Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D, and Johnson KA. 2011. The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota. Environ Resour Econ 48: 219–42.
26. Power AG. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos T R Soc B 365: 2959–71.
27. Prager K, Reed M, and Scott A. 2012. Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale – rethinking agri-environmental payments. Land Use Policy 29: 244–49.
28. Pretty JN, Noble AD, Bossio D, et al. 2006. Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environ Sci Technol 40: 1114–19.
29. Ray DK, Duckles JM, and Pijanowski BC. 2010. The impact of future land use scenarios on runoff volumes in the Muskegon River watershed. Environ Manage 46: 351–66.
30. Rodríguez JP, Beard TD, Bennett EM, et al. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11: 28.
31. Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Guerry A, et al. 2013. Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol Econ 115: 11–21.
32. Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, et al. 2015. InVEST 3.2.0 User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.
33. Shen C. 2015. Discussion on difficulties and solutions of multiple planning integration. Environ Protection 43: 17–19.
34. Sunohara MD, Topp E, Wilkes G, et al. 2012. Impact of riparian zone protection from cattle on nutrient, bacteria, F-coliphage, and loading of an intermittent stream. J Environ Qual 41: 1301–14.
35. Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, et al. 2011. InVEST 2.2.2 user's guide. Stanford, CA: The Natural Capital Project.
36. Tang Y, Zhang Z, Wu J, et al. 2010. Two methods to estimate the non-point source pollution load of the typical small watershed in Miyun Area. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 29: 115–19.
37. Wang JR. 2001. Recognition on water resource sustainable use planning of Beijing in the early 21st century. Water Res Plan Design 2: 21–23.
38. White C, Halpern BS, and Kappel CV. 2012. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 4696–701.
39. Wong CP, Jiang B, Kinzig AP, et al. 2015. Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy. Ecol Lett 18: 108–18.
40. Yuan J. 2003. Discussion on the implementation of “Sustainable use planning for Beijing water resources in the early 21st century”. Design Water Resour Hydroelectric Eng 22: 19–20.
41. Zheng H, Robinson BE, Liang YC, et al. 2013. Benefit, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program. P Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 16681–86.
42. Ziv G, Baran E, Nam S, et al. 2012. Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 5609–14.
43. Zuo FS, Qi ZY, and Jiang MH. 2011. Evolution characteristics of the Miyun Reservoir inflow and its cause factors analysis. Beijing Water 2: 34–37.