Making decisions from weighted arguments

CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, Courses and Lectures

Volumn 482, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-14

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Prade, Henri ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Decision

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998849421     PISSN: 02541971     EISSN: 23093706     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-211-38167-8_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Automated Reasoning, Volume 29, N2:125-169, 2002.
2. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 34:197-216, 2002.
3. Salem Benferhat, Didier Dubois, and Henri Prade. Representing default rules in possibilistic logic. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 673-684, 1992.
4. B. Bonet and H. Geffner. Arguing for decisions: A qualitative model of decision making. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 98-105, 1996.
5. C. Boutilier. Towards a logic for qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 75-86, 1994.
6. C. Chesnevar, A. Maguitman, and R. P. Loui. Logical models of arguments. ACM computing surveys, 32:4:337-383, 2000.
7. D. Dubois, M. Grabisch, F. Modave, and H. Prade. Relating decision under uncertainty and multicriteria decision making models. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 15:967-979, 2000.
8. D. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade. Automated reasoning using possibilistic logic: semantics, belief revision and variable certainty weights. IEEE Trans, on Data and Knowledge Engineering, 6:64-71, 1994.
9. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In 14th Inter. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAFOS), pages 1924-1930, Montreal, August 20-25 1995. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
10. D. Dubois, H. Prade, and R. Sabbadin. A possibilistic logic machinery for qualitative decision. In Working Notes AAAVOl Workshop on Qualitative Preferences in Deliberation and Practical Reasoning, pages 47-54, Stanford, Mar. 24-26 1997. AAAI Press, Menlo Park.
11. Didier Dubois, Daniel Le Berre, Henri Prade, and Rgis Sabbadin. Using possibilistic logic for modeling qualitative decision: Atms-based algorithms. Fundamenta Informaticae, 37:1-30, 1999.
12. Didier Dubois, Luis Godo, Henri Prade, and A. Zapico. On the possibilistic decision model: from decision under uncertainty to case-based decision. Int. J. of Uncert., Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Syst., 7:6:631-670, 1999.
13. Didier Dubois, Henri Prade, and Rgis Sabbadin. Decision-theoretic foundations of qualitative possibility theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 128:459-478, 2001.
14. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
15. H. Fargier and R. Sabbadin. Qualitative decision under uncertainty: back to expected utility. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAF03, 2003.
16. J. Fox and S. Das. Safe and Sound. Artificial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications. AAAI Press, The MIT Press, 2000.
17. J. Fox and S. Parsons. On using arguments for reasoning about actions and values. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Qualitative Preferences in Deliberation and Practical Reasoning, Stanford, 1997.
18. B. Franklin. Letter to j. b. priestley, 1772, in the complete works, j. bigelow, ed.,. New York: Putnam, page 522, 1887.
19. S. Kraus, D. Lehmann, and M. Magidor. Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence, 44:167-207, 1990.
20. G. R. Simari and R. P. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 53:125-157, 1992.
21. S. W. Tan and J. Pearl. Qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 928-933, 1994.