Qualitative decision under uncertainty: Back to expected utility

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 303-308

  Fargier, Helene ^a   Sabbadin, Regis ^b  

^a 1RIT ^*  (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION PROCEDURE; DECISION UNDER UNCERTAINTY; EXPECTED UTILITY; NUMERICAL CRITERIA; PARETO DOMINANCE; POSSIBILITY THEORY; QUALITATIVE CRITERIA; QUALITATIVE MODEL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

PARETO PRINCIPLE;

EID: 84880818555     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade. Possibilistic and standard probabilistic semantics of conditional knowledge. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9:873-895, 1999. (Pubitemid 30558607)
2. L. Blume, A. Brandenburger, and E. Dekel. Lexicographic probabilities and choice under uncertainty. Econometrica, 59(1) :61-79, 1991.
3. B. Bonet and H. Geffner. Arguing for decisions: A qualitative model of decision making. In Proc. of UAI' 96, pages 98-105, 1996.
4. R. Brafman and M. Tennenholtz. Modeling agents as qualitative decision makers. Artificial Intelligence, 94:217-268, 1997. (Pubitemid 127371451)
5. J. Doyle and R. H. Thomason. Background to qualitative decision theory. AI Magazine, 20(2):55-68, 1999.
6. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In Proc. ofIJCAI'95, pages 1925-1930, 1995.
7. D. Dubois, H. Fargier, and H. Prade. Possibilistic likelihood relations. In Proc. of IPMU'98, pages 1196-1203. EDK, 1998.
8. D. Dubois, L. Godo, H. Prade, and A. Zapico. Making decision in a qualitative setting: From decision under uncertainty to case-based reasoning. In Proc. of KR '98, pages 594-605, 1998.
9. D. Dubois, H. Prade, and R. Sabbadin. Qualitative decision theory with sugcno integrals. In Proc. of UAI'98, pages 121-128, 1998.
10. D. Dubois, L. Godo, H. Prade, and A. Zapico. Advances in qualitative decision theory: Refined rankings. In Proc. IBERAM1A '00, pages 427-436, 2000.
11. H. Fargier and R. Sabbadin. Bridging the gap between qualitative decision theory and expected utility. Technical Report IR1T/03-08-R, 1R1T, April 2003.
12. P. H. Giang and P. P. Shenoy. On transformations between probability and spohnian disbelief functions. In Proc. ofUAI'99, pages 236-244, 1999.
13. P. H. Giang and P. P. Shenoy. A qualitative utility theory for spohn's theory of epistemic beliefs. In Proc. ofUAI'2000, pages 220-227, 2000.
14. I. Gilboa. Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16:65-88, 1987.
15. P. J. Hammond. Consequentialism, non archimedean probabilities and lexicographic expected utility, In: The logic of strategy. C. Bicchieri, R. Jeffrey and B. Skyrms, 1998.
16. I. H. La Valle and P. C. Fishburn. State-independent subjective expected lexicographic utility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5:217-240, 1992.
17. D. Lehmann. Nonstandard numbers for qualitative decision making. In Proc. of TARK'98, pages 161-174, 1998.
18. H. Moulin. Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making. Wiley, New-York, 1988.
19. J. Pearl. From conditional oughts to qualitative decision theory. In Proc. of UAJ'93, pages 12-20, 1993.
20. L.J. Savage. The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York, 1954.
21. P. Snow. Diverse confidence levels in a probabilistic semantics for conditional logics. Artificial Intelligence, 113(1-2):269-279, 1999. (Pubitemid 30542736)
22. W. Spohn. A general non-probabilistic theory of inductive reasoning. In Proc. ofUAI'9(), pages 315-322. Elsevier Science, 1990.
23. N. Wilson. An order of magnitude calculus. In Proc. of UAI'95, pages 548-555, 1995.